POLARIZATION, STIGMATIZATION, RADICALIZATION. COUNTERTERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY IN FRANCE AND GERMANY
The article analyzes the commonalities and differences of counterterrorism (CT) practices applied by governments in France and Germany and their effects on the local ground. Altogether, there has been a qualitative difference of CT responses. Paris has launched more extensive measures than Berlin. R...
Main Author: | Witold Mucha |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Daniel Koehler
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Journal for Deradicalization |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/89 |
Similar Items
-
Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
by: Cameron Sumpter
Published: (2017-06-01) -
Confronting Islamic Jihadist Movements
by: M. Afzal Upal
Published: (2015-05-01) -
Gap analysis of Pakistan’s non-kinetic responses to violent extremism
by: Khuram Iqbal, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01) -
‘Sometimes you just have to try something’ - A critical analysis of Danish state-led initiatives countering online radicalisation
by: Anna Warrington
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Portrait of Deradicalization in Indonesia: Has Pancasila Been Considered Effective?
by: Johan Febriansyah
Published: (2022-07-01)