Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation

This study compared the effectiveness of the multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials (mfVEP) elicited by pattern pulse stimulation with that of pattern reversal in producing reliable responses (signal-to-noise ratio >1.359). Participants were 14 healthy subjects. Visual stimulation was obtai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G.S. Souza, H.B. Schakelford, A.L.A. Moura, B.D. Gomes, D.F. Ventura, M.E.C. Fitzgerald, L.C.L. Silveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2012-10-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2012001000011&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818527124268515328
author G.S. Souza
H.B. Schakelford
A.L.A. Moura
B.D. Gomes
D.F. Ventura
M.E.C. Fitzgerald
L.C.L. Silveira
author_facet G.S. Souza
H.B. Schakelford
A.L.A. Moura
B.D. Gomes
D.F. Ventura
M.E.C. Fitzgerald
L.C.L. Silveira
author_sort G.S. Souza
collection DOAJ
description This study compared the effectiveness of the multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials (mfVEP) elicited by pattern pulse stimulation with that of pattern reversal in producing reliable responses (signal-to-noise ratio >1.359). Participants were 14 healthy subjects. Visual stimulation was obtained using a 60-sector dartboard display consisting of 6 concentric rings presented in either pulse or reversal mode. Each sector, consisting of 16 checks at 99% Michelson contrast and 80 cd/m² mean luminance, was controlled by a binary m-sequence in the time domain. The signal-to-noise ratio was generally larger in the pattern reversal than in the pattern pulse mode. The number of reliable responses was similar in the central sectors for the two stimulation modes. At the periphery, pattern reversal showed a larger number of reliable responses. Pattern pulse stimuli performed similarly to pattern reversal stimuli to generate reliable waveforms in R1 and R2. The advantage of using both protocols to study mfVEP responses is their complementarity: in some patients, reliable waveforms in specific sectors may be obtained with only one of the two methods. The joint analysis of pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimuli increased the rate of reliability for central sectors by 7.14% in R1, 5.35% in R2, 4.76% in R3, 3.57% in R4, 2.97% in R5, and 1.78% in R6. From R1 to R4 the reliability to generate mfVEPs was above 70% when using both protocols. Thus, for a very high reliability and thorough examination of visual performance, it is recommended to use both stimulation protocols.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:32:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-602ea7ff1b1446628eaf6626b0b63ea0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1414-431X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:32:02Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
spelling doaj.art-602ea7ff1b1446628eaf6626b0b63ea02022-12-22T01:17:28ZengAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação CientíficaBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research1414-431X2012-10-014510955961S0100-879X2012001000011Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulationG.S. Souza0H.B. Schakelford1A.L.A. Moura2B.D. Gomes3D.F. Ventura4M.E.C. Fitzgerald5L.C.L. Silveira6Universidade Federal do ParáChristian Brothers UniversityUniversidade de São PauloUniversidade Federal do ParáUniversidade de São PauloChristian Brothers UniversityUniversidade Federal do ParáThis study compared the effectiveness of the multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials (mfVEP) elicited by pattern pulse stimulation with that of pattern reversal in producing reliable responses (signal-to-noise ratio >1.359). Participants were 14 healthy subjects. Visual stimulation was obtained using a 60-sector dartboard display consisting of 6 concentric rings presented in either pulse or reversal mode. Each sector, consisting of 16 checks at 99% Michelson contrast and 80 cd/m² mean luminance, was controlled by a binary m-sequence in the time domain. The signal-to-noise ratio was generally larger in the pattern reversal than in the pattern pulse mode. The number of reliable responses was similar in the central sectors for the two stimulation modes. At the periphery, pattern reversal showed a larger number of reliable responses. Pattern pulse stimuli performed similarly to pattern reversal stimuli to generate reliable waveforms in R1 and R2. The advantage of using both protocols to study mfVEP responses is their complementarity: in some patients, reliable waveforms in specific sectors may be obtained with only one of the two methods. The joint analysis of pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimuli increased the rate of reliability for central sectors by 7.14% in R1, 5.35% in R2, 4.76% in R3, 3.57% in R4, 2.97% in R5, and 1.78% in R6. From R1 to R4 the reliability to generate mfVEPs was above 70% when using both protocols. Thus, for a very high reliability and thorough examination of visual performance, it is recommended to use both stimulation protocols.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2012001000011&lng=en&tlng=enMultifocal visual evoked cortical potentialContrast visionSpatial visionSignal-to-noise analysisVisual electrophysiology
spellingShingle G.S. Souza
H.B. Schakelford
A.L.A. Moura
B.D. Gomes
D.F. Ventura
M.E.C. Fitzgerald
L.C.L. Silveira
Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Multifocal visual evoked cortical potential
Contrast vision
Spatial vision
Signal-to-noise analysis
Visual electrophysiology
title Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation
title_full Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation
title_fullStr Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation
title_short Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation
title_sort comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation
topic Multifocal visual evoked cortical potential
Contrast vision
Spatial vision
Signal-to-noise analysis
Visual electrophysiology
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2012001000011&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT gssouza comparisonofthereliabilityofmultifocalvisualevokedcorticalpotentialsgeneratedbypatternreversalandpatternpulsestimulation
AT hbschakelford comparisonofthereliabilityofmultifocalvisualevokedcorticalpotentialsgeneratedbypatternreversalandpatternpulsestimulation
AT alamoura comparisonofthereliabilityofmultifocalvisualevokedcorticalpotentialsgeneratedbypatternreversalandpatternpulsestimulation
AT bdgomes comparisonofthereliabilityofmultifocalvisualevokedcorticalpotentialsgeneratedbypatternreversalandpatternpulsestimulation
AT dfventura comparisonofthereliabilityofmultifocalvisualevokedcorticalpotentialsgeneratedbypatternreversalandpatternpulsestimulation
AT mecfitzgerald comparisonofthereliabilityofmultifocalvisualevokedcorticalpotentialsgeneratedbypatternreversalandpatternpulsestimulation
AT lclsilveira comparisonofthereliabilityofmultifocalvisualevokedcorticalpotentialsgeneratedbypatternreversalandpatternpulsestimulation