Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy Sources

This study investigates a demand-side management problem in which multiple suppliers compete with each other to maximize their own revenue. We consider that suppliers have heterogeneous energy sources and individually set the unit price of each energy source. Then, consumers that share a net utility...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kireem Han, Joohyung Lee, Junkyun Choi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1342
_version_ 1798041464601575424
author Kireem Han
Joohyung Lee
Junkyun Choi
author_facet Kireem Han
Joohyung Lee
Junkyun Choi
author_sort Kireem Han
collection DOAJ
description This study investigates a demand-side management problem in which multiple suppliers compete with each other to maximize their own revenue. We consider that suppliers have heterogeneous energy sources and individually set the unit price of each energy source. Then, consumers that share a net utility react to the suppliers’ decisions on prices by deciding the amount of energy to request, or how to split the consumers’ aggregated demand over multiple suppliers. In this case, the consumers need to consider the power loss and the price to pay for procuring electricity. We analyze the economic benefits of such a pricing competition among suppliers (e.g., a demand-side management that considers consumers’ reaction). This is achieved by designing a hierarchical decision-making scheme as a multileader–multifollower Stackelberg game. We show that the behaviors of both consumers and suppliers based on well-designed utility functions converge to a unique equilibrium solution. This allows them to maximize the payoff from all participating consumers and suppliers. Accordingly, closed-form expressions are provided for the corresponding strategies of the consumers and the suppliers. Finally, we provide numerical examples to illustrate the effectiveness of the solutions. This game-theoretic study provides an example of incentives and insight for demand-side management in future power grids.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:21:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60381eb9574349cab25e545930f6b75c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:21:52Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-60381eb9574349cab25e545930f6b75c2022-12-22T04:00:03ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732017-09-01109134210.3390/en10091342en10091342Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy SourcesKireem Han0Joohyung Lee1Junkyun Choi2School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 34051 Daejeon, KoreaDepartment of Software, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea;School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 34051 Daejeon, KoreaThis study investigates a demand-side management problem in which multiple suppliers compete with each other to maximize their own revenue. We consider that suppliers have heterogeneous energy sources and individually set the unit price of each energy source. Then, consumers that share a net utility react to the suppliers’ decisions on prices by deciding the amount of energy to request, or how to split the consumers’ aggregated demand over multiple suppliers. In this case, the consumers need to consider the power loss and the price to pay for procuring electricity. We analyze the economic benefits of such a pricing competition among suppliers (e.g., a demand-side management that considers consumers’ reaction). This is achieved by designing a hierarchical decision-making scheme as a multileader–multifollower Stackelberg game. We show that the behaviors of both consumers and suppliers based on well-designed utility functions converge to a unique equilibrium solution. This allows them to maximize the payoff from all participating consumers and suppliers. Accordingly, closed-form expressions are provided for the corresponding strategies of the consumers and the suppliers. Finally, we provide numerical examples to illustrate the effectiveness of the solutions. This game-theoretic study provides an example of incentives and insight for demand-side management in future power grids.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1342demand-side managementpricing mechanismstackelberg gameequilibrium analysisheterogeneous energy sources
spellingShingle Kireem Han
Joohyung Lee
Junkyun Choi
Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy Sources
Energies
demand-side management
pricing mechanism
stackelberg game
equilibrium analysis
heterogeneous energy sources
title Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy Sources
title_full Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy Sources
title_fullStr Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy Sources
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy Sources
title_short Evaluation of Demand-Side Management over Pricing Competition of Multiple Suppliers Having Heterogeneous Energy Sources
title_sort evaluation of demand side management over pricing competition of multiple suppliers having heterogeneous energy sources
topic demand-side management
pricing mechanism
stackelberg game
equilibrium analysis
heterogeneous energy sources
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/9/1342
work_keys_str_mv AT kireemhan evaluationofdemandsidemanagementoverpricingcompetitionofmultiplesuppliershavingheterogeneousenergysources
AT joohyunglee evaluationofdemandsidemanagementoverpricingcompetitionofmultiplesuppliershavingheterogeneousenergysources
AT junkyunchoi evaluationofdemandsidemanagementoverpricingcompetitionofmultiplesuppliershavingheterogeneousenergysources