Appropriate design and reporting of superiority, equivalence and non-inferiority clinical trials incorporating a benefit–risk assessment: the BRAINS study including expert workshop
Background Randomised controlled trials are designed to assess the superiority, equivalence or non-inferiority of a new health technology, but which trial design should be used is not always obvious in practice. In particular, when using equivalence or non-inferiority designs, multiple outcomes of i...
Main Authors: | Nikki Totton, Steven A Julious, Elizabeth Coates, Dyfrig A Hughes, Jonathan A Cook, Katie Biggs, Catherine Hewitt, Simon Day, Andrew Cook |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
NIHR Journals Library
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Health Technology Assessment |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3310/BHQZ7691 |
Similar Items
-
Appropriate design and reporting of superiority, equivalence and non-inferiority clinical trials incorporating a benefit risk assessment: the BRAINS study including expert workshop
by: Totton, N, et al.
Published: (2023) -
baymedr: an R package and web application for the calculation of Bayes factors for superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority designs
by: Maximilian Linde, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
How do we know a treatment is good enough? A survey of non-inferiority trials
by: Naomi Attard, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Utilising benefit-risk assessments within clinical trials-a protocol for the BRAINS project
by: Totton, N, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Surgical Outcome of Inferior Oblique Myectomy versus Recession–Anteriorization in the Treatment of Inferior Oblique Overaction
by: Vijittrakarnrung T, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01)