Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD)
Abstract Background The Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) is a brief quantitative tool based on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT), which can measure the implementation process of new technologies and complex interventions. The aim of our study was to translate and culturally adapt the N...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08737-1 |
| _version_ | 1828129656764628992 |
|---|---|
| author | Mengyao Jiang Qing Wang Tracy Finch Dongli She Yujun Zhou Yuet Foon Chung Jie Chen Lin Han |
| author_facet | Mengyao Jiang Qing Wang Tracy Finch Dongli She Yujun Zhou Yuet Foon Chung Jie Chen Lin Han |
| author_sort | Mengyao Jiang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background The Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) is a brief quantitative tool based on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT), which can measure the implementation process of new technologies and complex interventions. The aim of our study was to translate and culturally adapt the NoMAD into Chinese, and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of NoMAD. Methods According to the NoMAD translation guideline, we undertook forward translation, backward translation, and compared these translations to get a satisfactory result, then we performed cognitive interviews to achieve cross-culture adaptation. And the psychometric properties of the final version were evaluated among clinical nurses who used the pressure injuries management system via WeChat mini-program at a tertiary hospital in northwestern China. Results A total of 258 nurses were enrolled in our study, and the response rate was 92.1%. The Cronbach’s alpha of four dimensions were as follow: Coherence (0.768), Cognitive Participation (0.904), Collective Action (0.820), and Reflexive Monitoring (0.808). The overall internal consistency was 0.941. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed a good fit for its theoretical structure (CFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.910, RMSEA = 0.0079, SRMSR = 0.046, χ2/df = 2.61). The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.857 to 1, and the scale-level content validity index was 0.95. There were positive correlations between four constructs scores and three general normalization scores. Conclusions The Chinese version of NoMAD is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the implementation process of innovations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T16:23:09Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-605a1c4ee04149fa8620ebaa0893dba9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6963 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T16:23:09Z |
| publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Health Services Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-605a1c4ee04149fa8620ebaa0893dba92022-12-22T04:14:15ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-11-0122111010.1186/s12913-022-08737-1Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD)Mengyao Jiang0Qing Wang1Tracy Finch2Dongli She3Yujun Zhou4Yuet Foon Chung5Jie Chen6Lin Han7Evidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Chengguan DistrictEvidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Chengguan DistrictDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria UniversityDepartment of Nursing, Gansu Provincial HospitalEvidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Chengguan DistrictEvidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Chengguan DistrictSchool of Nursing, University of ConnecticutEvidence-Based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Chengguan DistrictAbstract Background The Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) is a brief quantitative tool based on the Normalization Process Theory (NPT), which can measure the implementation process of new technologies and complex interventions. The aim of our study was to translate and culturally adapt the NoMAD into Chinese, and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of NoMAD. Methods According to the NoMAD translation guideline, we undertook forward translation, backward translation, and compared these translations to get a satisfactory result, then we performed cognitive interviews to achieve cross-culture adaptation. And the psychometric properties of the final version were evaluated among clinical nurses who used the pressure injuries management system via WeChat mini-program at a tertiary hospital in northwestern China. Results A total of 258 nurses were enrolled in our study, and the response rate was 92.1%. The Cronbach’s alpha of four dimensions were as follow: Coherence (0.768), Cognitive Participation (0.904), Collective Action (0.820), and Reflexive Monitoring (0.808). The overall internal consistency was 0.941. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed a good fit for its theoretical structure (CFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.910, RMSEA = 0.0079, SRMSR = 0.046, χ2/df = 2.61). The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.857 to 1, and the scale-level content validity index was 0.95. There were positive correlations between four constructs scores and three general normalization scores. Conclusions The Chinese version of NoMAD is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the implementation process of innovations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08737-1Normalization process theoryNPTImplementationPsychometric propertiesPressure injuryNurse |
| spellingShingle | Mengyao Jiang Qing Wang Tracy Finch Dongli She Yujun Zhou Yuet Foon Chung Jie Chen Lin Han Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD) BMC Health Services Research Normalization process theory NPT Implementation Psychometric properties Pressure injury Nurse |
| title | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD) |
| title_full | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD) |
| title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD) |
| title_short | Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Normalization MeAsure Development(NoMAD) |
| title_sort | validity and reliability of the chinese version of the normalization measure development nomad |
| topic | Normalization process theory NPT Implementation Psychometric properties Pressure injury Nurse |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08737-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mengyaojiang validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad AT qingwang validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad AT tracyfinch validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad AT donglishe validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad AT yujunzhou validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad AT yuetfoonchung validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad AT jiechen validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad AT linhan validityandreliabilityofthechineseversionofthenormalizationmeasuredevelopmentnomad |