Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs

Abstract Objective To compare periapical radiograph (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures. Material and Methods Sixty incisor teeth (20 higid and 40 with root fracture) from dogs were inserted in 60 anterior alveolar sockets (40 higid and 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Solange KOBAYASHI-VELASCO, Fernanda Cristina Sales SALINEIRO, Ivan Onone GIALAIN, Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso CAVALCANTI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000200227&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811276397162790912
author Solange KOBAYASHI-VELASCO
Fernanda Cristina Sales SALINEIRO
Ivan Onone GIALAIN
Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso CAVALCANTI
author_facet Solange KOBAYASHI-VELASCO
Fernanda Cristina Sales SALINEIRO
Ivan Onone GIALAIN
Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso CAVALCANTI
author_sort Solange KOBAYASHI-VELASCO
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To compare periapical radiograph (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures. Material and Methods Sixty incisor teeth (20 higid and 40 with root fracture) from dogs were inserted in 60 anterior alveolar sockets (40 higid and 20 with alveolar fracture) of 15 macerated canine maxillae. Each fractured socket had a root fractured tooth inserted in it. Afterwards, each maxilla was submitted to PR in two different vertical angulation incidences, and to CBCT imaging with a small field of view (FOV) and high-definition protocol. Images were randomized and posteriorly analyzed by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists two times, with a two-week interval between observations. Results Sensitivity and specificity values were good for root fractures for PR and CBCT. For alveolar fractures, sensitivity ranged from 0.10 to 0.90 for PR and from 0.50 to 0.65 for CBCT. Specificity for alveolar fractures showed lower results than for root fractures for PR and CBCT. Areas under the ROC curve showed good results for both PR and CBCT for root fractures. However, results were fair for both PR and CBCT for alveolar fractures. When submitted to repeated measures ANOVA tests, there was a statistically significant difference between PR and CBCT for root fractures. Root fracture intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.90 to 0.93, and alveolar fracture intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.30 to 0.57. Interobserver agreement results were substantial for root fractures and poor/fair for alveolar fractures (0.11 for PR and 0.30 for CBCT). Conclusion Periapical radiograph with two different vertical angulations may be considered an accurate method to detect root fractures. However, PR showed poorer results than CBCT for the diagnosis of alveolar fractures. When no fractures are diagnosed in PR and the patient describes pain symptoms, the subsequent exam of choice is CBCT.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:56:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6061c13513ac404e9248509b51cf0685
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-7765
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:56:52Z
publisher University of São Paulo
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
spelling doaj.art-6061c13513ac404e9248509b51cf06852022-12-22T03:11:28ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-776525222723310.1590/1678-77572016-0332S1678-77572017000200227Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographsSolange KOBAYASHI-VELASCOFernanda Cristina Sales SALINEIROIvan Onone GIALAINMarcelo Gusmão Paraiso CAVALCANTIAbstract Objective To compare periapical radiograph (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures. Material and Methods Sixty incisor teeth (20 higid and 40 with root fracture) from dogs were inserted in 60 anterior alveolar sockets (40 higid and 20 with alveolar fracture) of 15 macerated canine maxillae. Each fractured socket had a root fractured tooth inserted in it. Afterwards, each maxilla was submitted to PR in two different vertical angulation incidences, and to CBCT imaging with a small field of view (FOV) and high-definition protocol. Images were randomized and posteriorly analyzed by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists two times, with a two-week interval between observations. Results Sensitivity and specificity values were good for root fractures for PR and CBCT. For alveolar fractures, sensitivity ranged from 0.10 to 0.90 for PR and from 0.50 to 0.65 for CBCT. Specificity for alveolar fractures showed lower results than for root fractures for PR and CBCT. Areas under the ROC curve showed good results for both PR and CBCT for root fractures. However, results were fair for both PR and CBCT for alveolar fractures. When submitted to repeated measures ANOVA tests, there was a statistically significant difference between PR and CBCT for root fractures. Root fracture intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.90 to 0.93, and alveolar fracture intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.30 to 0.57. Interobserver agreement results were substantial for root fractures and poor/fair for alveolar fractures (0.11 for PR and 0.30 for CBCT). Conclusion Periapical radiograph with two different vertical angulations may be considered an accurate method to detect root fractures. However, PR showed poorer results than CBCT for the diagnosis of alveolar fractures. When no fractures are diagnosed in PR and the patient describes pain symptoms, the subsequent exam of choice is CBCT.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000200227&lng=en&tlng=enDiagnostic imagingCone-beam computed tomographyDigital dental radiographyTooth fracturesBone fractures
spellingShingle Solange KOBAYASHI-VELASCO
Fernanda Cristina Sales SALINEIRO
Ivan Onone GIALAIN
Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso CAVALCANTI
Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Diagnostic imaging
Cone-beam computed tomography
Digital dental radiography
Tooth fractures
Bone fractures
title Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs
title_full Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs
title_fullStr Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs
title_short Diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures: an in vitro study comparing CBCT imaging with periapical radiographs
title_sort diagnosis of alveolar and root fractures an in vitro study comparing cbct imaging with periapical radiographs
topic Diagnostic imaging
Cone-beam computed tomography
Digital dental radiography
Tooth fractures
Bone fractures
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572017000200227&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT solangekobayashivelasco diagnosisofalveolarandrootfracturesaninvitrostudycomparingcbctimagingwithperiapicalradiographs
AT fernandacristinasalessalineiro diagnosisofalveolarandrootfracturesaninvitrostudycomparingcbctimagingwithperiapicalradiographs
AT ivanononegialain diagnosisofalveolarandrootfracturesaninvitrostudycomparingcbctimagingwithperiapicalradiographs
AT marcelogusmaoparaisocavalcanti diagnosisofalveolarandrootfracturesaninvitrostudycomparingcbctimagingwithperiapicalradiographs