Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders
Introduction: We evaluated the quality of the published clinical practice guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders to provide reference for the development of high-quality PAS guidelines. Methods: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | Heliyon |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024044219 |
| _version_ | 1797242950471647232 |
|---|---|
| author | Caihong Hu Weishe Zhang Heyang Pu Kuilin Fei Qi Li Jingrui Huang |
| author_facet | Caihong Hu Weishe Zhang Heyang Pu Kuilin Fei Qi Li Jingrui Huang |
| author_sort | Caihong Hu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: We evaluated the quality of the published clinical practice guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders to provide reference for the development of high-quality PAS guidelines. Methods: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Quality assessments were conducted using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) II framework and Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the agreement among reviewers. Results: In total, 13 guidelines from different countries, published between 2015 and 2021 were included. There included 9 official guidelines, 3 consensuses, and 1 standard reference and covered subjects including epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. The mean standardized scores across 6 domains (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence) were 53.63%, 27.35%, 33.57%, 72.01%, 19.39% and 41.02%, respectively. Of the 13 guidelines, 11 were classified as grade B, whereas 2 as grade C. According to the RIGHT checklist, the overall reporting rate of the 13 guidelines ranged from 28.57% to 54.29%. Conclusion: The current guidelines for PAS demonstrate commendable methodological and reporting qualities. However, the methodological and reporting quality of PAS CPGs still need to be further improved, particularly in stakeholder involvement, the rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence domains. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:47:22Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6064fc29c0fb4a70a2cb356d5221ec41 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2405-8440 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T18:47:22Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Heliyon |
| spelling | doaj.art-6064fc29c0fb4a70a2cb356d5221ec412024-03-27T04:52:36ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402024-04-01107e28390Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disordersCaihong Hu0Weishe Zhang1Heyang Pu2Kuilin Fei3Qi Li4Jingrui Huang5Department of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China; Hunan Engineering Research Center of Early Life Development and Disease Prevention, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, ChinaReproductive Medicine Center, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, ChinaDepartment of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China; Corresponding author. Department of Obstetrics, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, China.Introduction: We evaluated the quality of the published clinical practice guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders to provide reference for the development of high-quality PAS guidelines. Methods: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched. Quality assessments were conducted using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) II framework and Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the agreement among reviewers. Results: In total, 13 guidelines from different countries, published between 2015 and 2021 were included. There included 9 official guidelines, 3 consensuses, and 1 standard reference and covered subjects including epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. The mean standardized scores across 6 domains (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, and editorial independence) were 53.63%, 27.35%, 33.57%, 72.01%, 19.39% and 41.02%, respectively. Of the 13 guidelines, 11 were classified as grade B, whereas 2 as grade C. According to the RIGHT checklist, the overall reporting rate of the 13 guidelines ranged from 28.57% to 54.29%. Conclusion: The current guidelines for PAS demonstrate commendable methodological and reporting qualities. However, the methodological and reporting quality of PAS CPGs still need to be further improved, particularly in stakeholder involvement, the rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence domains.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024044219Placenta accreta spectrumClinical guidelineQuality evaluationAGREE IIRIGHT |
| spellingShingle | Caihong Hu Weishe Zhang Heyang Pu Kuilin Fei Qi Li Jingrui Huang Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders Heliyon Placenta accreta spectrum Clinical guideline Quality evaluation AGREE II RIGHT |
| title | Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders |
| title_full | Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders |
| title_fullStr | Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders |
| title_short | Quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders |
| title_sort | quality evaluation of clinical practice guidelines for placenta accreta spectrum disorders |
| topic | Placenta accreta spectrum Clinical guideline Quality evaluation AGREE II RIGHT |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024044219 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT caihonghu qualityevaluationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforplacentaaccretaspectrumdisorders AT weishezhang qualityevaluationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforplacentaaccretaspectrumdisorders AT heyangpu qualityevaluationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforplacentaaccretaspectrumdisorders AT kuilinfei qualityevaluationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforplacentaaccretaspectrumdisorders AT qili qualityevaluationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforplacentaaccretaspectrumdisorders AT jingruihuang qualityevaluationofclinicalpracticeguidelinesforplacentaaccretaspectrumdisorders |