From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*

The occurrence of some events can impact asset prices and produce losses. The amplitude of these losses are partly determined by the degree of predictability of those events by the market investors, as risk premiums build up in an asset price as a compensation of the anticipated losses. The aim of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coculescu Delia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2017-06-01
Series:ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/proc/201756001
_version_ 1797971208614969344
author Coculescu Delia
author_facet Coculescu Delia
author_sort Coculescu Delia
collection DOAJ
description The occurrence of some events can impact asset prices and produce losses. The amplitude of these losses are partly determined by the degree of predictability of those events by the market investors, as risk premiums build up in an asset price as a compensation of the anticipated losses. The aim of this paper is to propose a general framework where these phenomena can be properly defined and quantified. Our focus are the default events and the defaultable assets, but the framework could apply to any event whose occurrence impacts some asset prices. We provide the general construction of a default time under the so called (H) hypothesis, which reveals a useful way in which default models can be built, using both market factors and idiosyncratic factors. All the relevant characteristics of a default time (i.e. the Azéma supermartingale and its Doob-Meyer decomposition) are explicitly computed given the information about these factors. We then define the default event risk premiums and the default adjusted probability measure. These concepts are useful for pricing defaultable claims in a framework that includes possible economic shocks, such as jumps of the recovery process or of some default-free assets at the default time. These formulas are not classic and we point out that the knowledge of the default compensator (or the intensity process when the default time is totally inaccessible) is not a sufficient quantity for finding explicit prices; the Azéma supermartingale and its Doob-Meyer decomposition are needed. The progressive enlargement of a filtration framework is the right tool for pricing defaultable claims in non standard frameworks where non defaultable assets or recovery processes may react at the default event.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T03:27:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-607ab6b694ca4ec1957868b62b823d25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-3059
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T03:27:54Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys
spelling doaj.art-607ab6b694ca4ec1957868b62b823d252023-01-02T06:58:01ZengEDP SciencesESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys2267-30592017-06-015612110.1051/proc/201756001proc175601From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*Coculescu DeliaThe occurrence of some events can impact asset prices and produce losses. The amplitude of these losses are partly determined by the degree of predictability of those events by the market investors, as risk premiums build up in an asset price as a compensation of the anticipated losses. The aim of this paper is to propose a general framework where these phenomena can be properly defined and quantified. Our focus are the default events and the defaultable assets, but the framework could apply to any event whose occurrence impacts some asset prices. We provide the general construction of a default time under the so called (H) hypothesis, which reveals a useful way in which default models can be built, using both market factors and idiosyncratic factors. All the relevant characteristics of a default time (i.e. the Azéma supermartingale and its Doob-Meyer decomposition) are explicitly computed given the information about these factors. We then define the default event risk premiums and the default adjusted probability measure. These concepts are useful for pricing defaultable claims in a framework that includes possible economic shocks, such as jumps of the recovery process or of some default-free assets at the default time. These formulas are not classic and we point out that the knowledge of the default compensator (or the intensity process when the default time is totally inaccessible) is not a sufficient quantity for finding explicit prices; the Azéma supermartingale and its Doob-Meyer decomposition are needed. The progressive enlargement of a filtration framework is the right tool for pricing defaultable claims in non standard frameworks where non defaultable assets or recovery processes may react at the default event.https://doi.org/10.1051/proc/201756001
spellingShingle Coculescu Delia
From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*
ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys
title From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*
title_full From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*
title_fullStr From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*
title_full_unstemmed From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*
title_short From the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions*
title_sort from the decompositions of a stopping time to risk premium decompositions
url https://doi.org/10.1051/proc/201756001
work_keys_str_mv AT coculescudelia fromthedecompositionsofastoppingtimetoriskpremiumdecompositions