The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff

In the first part the text presents the basic methodological disposition of the discoursive analysis and its applicability in processing urbanistic problems. It can help to understand why there is a lot of permanent communication problems in the field, but it can also help to reveal the structure of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Drago Kos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Urbanistični inštitut RS 2006-01-01
Series:Urbani Izziv
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2006-17-01-02-011.pdf
_version_ 1818692511934185472
author Drago Kos
author_facet Drago Kos
author_sort Drago Kos
collection DOAJ
description In the first part the text presents the basic methodological disposition of the discoursive analysis and its applicability in processing urbanistic problems. It can help to understand why there is a lot of permanent communication problems in the field, but it can also help to reveal the structure of interests which in urbanism quite often is not transparent enough. In the second part the theoretical discoursive typology is presented and discussed. The third part presents the results of the qualitative context analysis of the expert discourse in texts dealing with Ljubljana urbanism.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T12:58:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-607f6b52994a449d904b3a6669a9a403
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0353-6483
1855-8399
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T12:58:58Z
publishDate 2006-01-01
publisher Urbanistični inštitut RS
record_format Article
series Urbani Izziv
spelling doaj.art-607f6b52994a449d904b3a6669a9a4032022-12-21T21:47:24ZengUrbanistični inštitut RSUrbani Izziv0353-64831855-83992006-01-01171–28592The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluffDrago KosIn the first part the text presents the basic methodological disposition of the discoursive analysis and its applicability in processing urbanistic problems. It can help to understand why there is a lot of permanent communication problems in the field, but it can also help to reveal the structure of interests which in urbanism quite often is not transparent enough. In the second part the theoretical discoursive typology is presented and discussed. The third part presents the results of the qualitative context analysis of the expert discourse in texts dealing with Ljubljana urbanism.http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2006-17-01-02-011.pdfdiscoursive analysisexpert discourseurbanism
spellingShingle Drago Kos
The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
Urbani Izziv
discoursive analysis
expert discourse
urbanism
title The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
title_full The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
title_fullStr The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
title_full_unstemmed The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
title_short The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
title_sort urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
topic discoursive analysis
expert discourse
urbanism
url http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2006-17-01-02-011.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dragokos theurbanisticdiscoursebetweenprofessionalismandbluff
AT dragokos urbanisticdiscoursebetweenprofessionalismandbluff