The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff
In the first part the text presents the basic methodological disposition of the discoursive analysis and its applicability in processing urbanistic problems. It can help to understand why there is a lot of permanent communication problems in the field, but it can also help to reveal the structure of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Urbanistični inštitut RS
2006-01-01
|
Series: | Urbani Izziv |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2006-17-01-02-011.pdf |
_version_ | 1818692511934185472 |
---|---|
author | Drago Kos |
author_facet | Drago Kos |
author_sort | Drago Kos |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the first part the text presents the basic methodological disposition of the discoursive analysis and its applicability in processing urbanistic problems. It can help to understand why there is a lot of permanent communication problems in the field, but it can also help to reveal the structure of interests which in urbanism quite often is not transparent enough. In the second part the theoretical discoursive typology is presented and discussed. The third part presents the results of the qualitative context analysis of the expert discourse in texts dealing with Ljubljana urbanism. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T12:58:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-607f6b52994a449d904b3a6669a9a403 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0353-6483 1855-8399 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T12:58:58Z |
publishDate | 2006-01-01 |
publisher | Urbanistični inštitut RS |
record_format | Article |
series | Urbani Izziv |
spelling | doaj.art-607f6b52994a449d904b3a6669a9a4032022-12-21T21:47:24ZengUrbanistični inštitut RSUrbani Izziv0353-64831855-83992006-01-01171–28592The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluffDrago KosIn the first part the text presents the basic methodological disposition of the discoursive analysis and its applicability in processing urbanistic problems. It can help to understand why there is a lot of permanent communication problems in the field, but it can also help to reveal the structure of interests which in urbanism quite often is not transparent enough. In the second part the theoretical discoursive typology is presented and discussed. The third part presents the results of the qualitative context analysis of the expert discourse in texts dealing with Ljubljana urbanism.http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2006-17-01-02-011.pdfdiscoursive analysisexpert discourseurbanism |
spellingShingle | Drago Kos The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff Urbani Izziv discoursive analysis expert discourse urbanism |
title | The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff |
title_full | The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff |
title_fullStr | The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff |
title_full_unstemmed | The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff |
title_short | The urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff |
title_sort | urbanistic discourse between professionalism and bluff |
topic | discoursive analysis expert discourse urbanism |
url | http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2006-17-01-02-011.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dragokos theurbanisticdiscoursebetweenprofessionalismandbluff AT dragokos urbanisticdiscoursebetweenprofessionalismandbluff |