The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological Anthropology
In early 20th century, a widespread tendency toward a philosophical anthropology was dominant over the intellectual space in Germany, and it was so deep and extensive in its influence that phenomenology had to react and take a stance against it. This initial stance appeared be an essential conflict...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fas |
| Published: |
Allameh Tabataba'i University Press
2020-06-01
|
| Series: | حکمت و فلسفه |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_12580_6b69c2dd9954216ff42f1be8570d9e98.pdf |
| _version_ | 1827580799265800192 |
|---|---|
| author | Ehsan Karimi Torshizi Ahmad Ali Heidari |
| author_facet | Ehsan Karimi Torshizi Ahmad Ali Heidari |
| author_sort | Ehsan Karimi Torshizi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In early 20th century, a widespread tendency toward a philosophical anthropology was dominant over the intellectual space in Germany, and it was so deep and extensive in its influence that phenomenology had to react and take a stance against it. This initial stance appeared be an essential conflict of a sort, so that Blumenberg coined the term “anthropological ban” regarding Husserl’s and Heidegger’s Phenomenologies. In this paper, we have tried to illustrate that such a confliction is neither essential nor absolute, meaning that it is quite legitimate to talk about a philosophical anthropology of a sort based on Husserl’s and Heidegger’s Phenomenologies. Thus, the plot and general characteristics of such a phenomenological anthropology, in terms of Heidegger's existential analysis of Dasein as a Fundamental ontology in his Sein und Zeit, has been depicted, and its fundamentally different anthropological pattern comparing with that of a traditional anthropology has also been demonstrated. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-608baa7fe6e44295a2ff70c8ffdf2a38 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1735-3238 2476-6038 |
| language | fas |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T22:25:14Z |
| publishDate | 2020-06-01 |
| publisher | Allameh Tabataba'i University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | حکمت و فلسفه |
| spelling | doaj.art-608baa7fe6e44295a2ff70c8ffdf2a382023-12-18T10:46:48ZfasAllameh Tabataba'i University Pressحکمت و فلسفه1735-32382476-60382020-06-01166273310.22054/wph.2021.49168.180412580The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological AnthropologyEhsan Karimi Torshizi0Ahmad Ali Heidari1PhD Candidate of Philosophy, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran;Associate Professor of Philosophy, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran;In early 20th century, a widespread tendency toward a philosophical anthropology was dominant over the intellectual space in Germany, and it was so deep and extensive in its influence that phenomenology had to react and take a stance against it. This initial stance appeared be an essential conflict of a sort, so that Blumenberg coined the term “anthropological ban” regarding Husserl’s and Heidegger’s Phenomenologies. In this paper, we have tried to illustrate that such a confliction is neither essential nor absolute, meaning that it is quite legitimate to talk about a philosophical anthropology of a sort based on Husserl’s and Heidegger’s Phenomenologies. Thus, the plot and general characteristics of such a phenomenological anthropology, in terms of Heidegger's existential analysis of Dasein as a Fundamental ontology in his Sein und Zeit, has been depicted, and its fundamentally different anthropological pattern comparing with that of a traditional anthropology has also been demonstrated.https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_12580_6b69c2dd9954216ff42f1be8570d9e98.pdfphilosophical anthropologyphenomenologyanthropological banheideggerhusserl |
| spellingShingle | Ehsan Karimi Torshizi Ahmad Ali Heidari The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological Anthropology حکمت و فلسفه philosophical anthropology phenomenology anthropological ban heidegger husserl |
| title | The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological Anthropology |
| title_full | The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological Anthropology |
| title_fullStr | The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological Anthropology |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological Anthropology |
| title_short | The Phenomenology and “The Anthropological Ban” on the Legitimacy of a Phenomenological Anthropology |
| title_sort | phenomenology and the anthropological ban on the legitimacy of a phenomenological anthropology |
| topic | philosophical anthropology phenomenology anthropological ban heidegger husserl |
| url | https://wph.atu.ac.ir/article_12580_6b69c2dd9954216ff42f1be8570d9e98.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ehsankarimitorshizi thephenomenologyandtheanthropologicalbanonthelegitimacyofaphenomenologicalanthropology AT ahmadaliheidari thephenomenologyandtheanthropologicalbanonthelegitimacyofaphenomenologicalanthropology AT ehsankarimitorshizi phenomenologyandtheanthropologicalbanonthelegitimacyofaphenomenologicalanthropology AT ahmadaliheidari phenomenologyandtheanthropologicalbanonthelegitimacyofaphenomenologicalanthropology |