Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’
Mises’s work of ‘Human action’ is analyzed in relation to the methodological conceptions of his predecessor C. Menger and of his successor F. von Hayek. Also, it is placed in the continuation of one of his previous works and in contrast to one that followed it. Some of his ideas can be better unders...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Editura ASE Bucuresti
2018-11-01
|
| Series: | The Journal of Philosophical Economics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://www.jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=8078
|
| _version_ | 1797998438951944192 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexandru A. POPOVICI |
| author_facet | Alexandru A. POPOVICI |
| author_sort | Alexandru A. POPOVICI |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Mises’s work of ‘Human action’ is analyzed in relation to the methodological conceptions of his predecessor C. Menger and of his successor F. von Hayek. Also, it is placed in the continuation of one of his previous works and in contrast to one that followed it. Some of his ideas can be better understood in such a way, while others show themselves as contradictory. It results that his attempt to combine apriorism with scientific realism explains some of major difficulties of Mises’s argumentation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T10:48:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-609aafc324e44bf88668dc3006ac5dc5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1843-2298 1844-8208 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T10:48:47Z |
| publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
| publisher | Editura ASE Bucuresti |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Journal of Philosophical Economics |
| spelling | doaj.art-609aafc324e44bf88668dc3006ac5dc52022-12-22T04:28:58ZdeuEditura ASE BucurestiThe Journal of Philosophical Economics1843-22981844-82082018-11-01XII1112125Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’Alexandru A. POPOVICI0 Romanian-American University, Bucharest (Romania) Mises’s work of ‘Human action’ is analyzed in relation to the methodological conceptions of his predecessor C. Menger and of his successor F. von Hayek. Also, it is placed in the continuation of one of his previous works and in contrast to one that followed it. Some of his ideas can be better understood in such a way, while others show themselves as contradictory. It results that his attempt to combine apriorism with scientific realism explains some of major difficulties of Mises’s argumentation. https://www.jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=8078 philosophy of economicsAustrian Schoolapriorismrealismhistorismneopositivism |
| spellingShingle | Alexandru A. POPOVICI Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’ The Journal of Philosophical Economics philosophy of economics Austrian School apriorism realism historism neopositivism |
| title | Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’ |
| title_full | Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’ |
| title_fullStr | Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’ |
| title_full_unstemmed | Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’ |
| title_short | Critical comments on the philosophical context of Ludwig von Mises’s ‘Human action’ |
| title_sort | critical comments on the philosophical context of ludwig von mises s human action |
| topic | philosophy of economics Austrian School apriorism realism historism neopositivism |
| url |
https://www.jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=8078
|
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexandruapopovici criticalcommentsonthephilosophicalcontextofludwigvonmisesshumanaction |