Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the backdrop of conflicting reports (some studies reported adverse outcomes of biomass fuel use whereas few studies reported absence of any association between adverse health effect and fuel use, may be due to presence of large nu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Majumdar PK, Kulkarni PK, Mohan Rao N, Saha Asim, Saiyed HN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2005-10-01
Series:Respiratory Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://respiratory-research.com/content/6/1/127
_version_ 1811311096744640512
author Majumdar PK
Kulkarni PK
Mohan Rao N
Saha Asim
Saiyed HN
author_facet Majumdar PK
Kulkarni PK
Mohan Rao N
Saha Asim
Saiyed HN
author_sort Majumdar PK
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the backdrop of conflicting reports (some studies reported adverse outcomes of biomass fuel use whereas few studies reported absence of any association between adverse health effect and fuel use, may be due to presence of large number of confounding variables) on the respiratory health effects of biomass fuel use, this cross sectional survey was undertaken to understand the role of fuel use on pulmonary function.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>This study was conducted in a village of western India involving 369 randomly selected adult subjects (165 male and 204 female). All the subjects were interviewed and were subjected to pulmonary function test. Analysis of covariance was performed to compare the levels of different pulmonary function test parameters in relation to different fuel use taking care of the role of possible confounding factors.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>This study showed that biomass fuel use (especially wood) is an important factor for deterioration of pulmonary function (particularly in female). FEV<sub>1 </sub>(p < .05), FEV<sub>1 </sub>% (p < .01), PEFR (p < .05) and FEF<sub>25–75 </sub>(p < .01) values were significantly lower in biomass fuel using females than nonusers. Comparison of only biomass fuel use vs. only LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) use and only wood vs. only LPG use has showed that LPG is a safer fuel so far as deterioration of pulmonary function is concerned. This study observes some deterioration of pulmonary function in the male subjects also, who came from biomass fuel using families.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study concluded that traditional biomass fuels like wood have adverse effects on pulmonary function.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:11:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60a679d0ce19461aa93b803e69e9493e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1465-9921
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:11:50Z
publishDate 2005-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Respiratory Research
spelling doaj.art-60a679d0ce19461aa93b803e69e9493e2022-12-22T02:50:52ZengBMCRespiratory Research1465-99212005-10-016112710.1186/1465-9921-6-127Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population surveyMajumdar PKKulkarni PKMohan Rao NSaha AsimSaiyed HN<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In the backdrop of conflicting reports (some studies reported adverse outcomes of biomass fuel use whereas few studies reported absence of any association between adverse health effect and fuel use, may be due to presence of large number of confounding variables) on the respiratory health effects of biomass fuel use, this cross sectional survey was undertaken to understand the role of fuel use on pulmonary function.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>This study was conducted in a village of western India involving 369 randomly selected adult subjects (165 male and 204 female). All the subjects were interviewed and were subjected to pulmonary function test. Analysis of covariance was performed to compare the levels of different pulmonary function test parameters in relation to different fuel use taking care of the role of possible confounding factors.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>This study showed that biomass fuel use (especially wood) is an important factor for deterioration of pulmonary function (particularly in female). FEV<sub>1 </sub>(p < .05), FEV<sub>1 </sub>% (p < .01), PEFR (p < .05) and FEF<sub>25–75 </sub>(p < .01) values were significantly lower in biomass fuel using females than nonusers. Comparison of only biomass fuel use vs. only LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) use and only wood vs. only LPG use has showed that LPG is a safer fuel so far as deterioration of pulmonary function is concerned. This study observes some deterioration of pulmonary function in the male subjects also, who came from biomass fuel using families.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This study concluded that traditional biomass fuels like wood have adverse effects on pulmonary function.</p>http://respiratory-research.com/content/6/1/127Biomass fuelsLiquefied Petroleum GasPulmonary function
spellingShingle Majumdar PK
Kulkarni PK
Mohan Rao N
Saha Asim
Saiyed HN
Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
Respiratory Research
Biomass fuels
Liquefied Petroleum Gas
Pulmonary function
title Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_full Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_fullStr Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_full_unstemmed Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_short Pulmonary function and fuel use: A population survey
title_sort pulmonary function and fuel use a population survey
topic Biomass fuels
Liquefied Petroleum Gas
Pulmonary function
url http://respiratory-research.com/content/6/1/127
work_keys_str_mv AT majumdarpk pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT kulkarnipk pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT mohanraon pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT sahaasim pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey
AT saiyedhn pulmonaryfunctionandfueluseapopulationsurvey