Within-person structures of daily cognitive performance differ from between-person structures of cognitive abilities
Over a century of research on between-person differences has resulted in the consensus that human cognitive abilities are hierarchically organized, with a general factor, termed general intelligence or “g,” uppermost. Surprisingly, it is unknown whether this body of evidence is informative about how...
Main Authors: | Florian Schmiedek, Martin Lövdén, Timo von Oertzen, Ulman Lindenberger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020-06-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/9290.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Hundred days of cognitive training enhance broad cognitive abilities in adulthood: findings from the COGITO study
by: Florian Schmiedek, et al.
Published: (2010-07-01) -
Ergodic Subspace Analysis
by: Timo von Oertzen, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Within-Individual Variation in Cognitive Performance Is Not Noise: Why and How Cognitive Assessments Should Examine Within-Person Performance
by: Arabella Charlotte Vaughan, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Day2day: investigating daily variability of magnetic resonance imaging measures over half a year
by: Elisa Filevich, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
Temporal Interactions between Maintenance of Cerebral Cortex Thickness and Physical Activity from an Individual Person Micro-Longitudinal Perspective and Implications for Precision Medicine
by: John Wall, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)