ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RM

In the framework of this article, there are examined some problematic and unordinary aspects regarding the process of render and application of art.151 and 152 PC RM, that usually inure to provoke controversies, with considerable practical connotations. We reach the conclusion that subject to notio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: USM ADMIN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moldova State University 2010-05-01
Series:Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
Online Access:https://ojs.studiamsu.md/index.php/stiinte_sociale/article/view/4189
_version_ 1797950874837843968
author USM ADMIN
author_facet USM ADMIN
author_sort USM ADMIN
collection DOAJ
description In the framework of this article, there are examined some problematic and unordinary aspects regarding the process of render and application of art.151 and 152 PC RM, that usually inure to provoke controversies, with considerable practical connotations. We reach the conclusion that subject to notion „organ loss” (within the meaning of art.151 PC RM) is the injuring of an unfunctional organ, when subsequently is necessitated (from medical point of view) it ablation. In the same time, we conclude that causing work disability – full or partial – will not train the application of art.151, 152 PC RM or art.78 of the Contravention Code. Is argued why lose of teeth can’t be qualified as grave health or corporal battery. On there are examined the aggravated circumstances prevented at lett.b),c),d) par.(3) art.151 and lett.c1),d),e) par.(2) art.152 PC RM. Especially, are analyzed the application conditions of the penal responsibility for intentioned grave health or corporal battery/intentioned midst health or corporal battery, perpetrated consciously against infants or pregnant women either as a result of victims known or evident impotence situation, due to agedness, illness, physical or psychic handicap or due to other issues. As well, there is performed the research concerning the same offences, more exactly concerning the hypothesis on its perpetration against a person interrelated with him accomplishing his job or social commitments. Finally, we found important to analyze the perpetration hypothesis of intentional grave health or corporal battery/intentional midst health or corporal battery by two or more persons. Theoretical investigations are followed by relevant examples from the judicial practice. The prepared conclusion and references have the vocation to replace the informational vacuum concerning the render and the application of the disposals prevented at art.151 and art.152 PC RM.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T22:21:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60b5533b77b7431289cb4e510d65ecab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1814-3199
2345-1017
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T22:21:55Z
publishDate 2010-05-01
publisher Moldova State University
record_format Article
series Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
spelling doaj.art-60b5533b77b7431289cb4e510d65ecab2023-01-17T16:06:11ZengMoldova State UniversityStudia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale1814-31992345-10172010-05-013ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RMUSM ADMIN In the framework of this article, there are examined some problematic and unordinary aspects regarding the process of render and application of art.151 and 152 PC RM, that usually inure to provoke controversies, with considerable practical connotations. We reach the conclusion that subject to notion „organ loss” (within the meaning of art.151 PC RM) is the injuring of an unfunctional organ, when subsequently is necessitated (from medical point of view) it ablation. In the same time, we conclude that causing work disability – full or partial – will not train the application of art.151, 152 PC RM or art.78 of the Contravention Code. Is argued why lose of teeth can’t be qualified as grave health or corporal battery. On there are examined the aggravated circumstances prevented at lett.b),c),d) par.(3) art.151 and lett.c1),d),e) par.(2) art.152 PC RM. Especially, are analyzed the application conditions of the penal responsibility for intentioned grave health or corporal battery/intentioned midst health or corporal battery, perpetrated consciously against infants or pregnant women either as a result of victims known or evident impotence situation, due to agedness, illness, physical or psychic handicap or due to other issues. As well, there is performed the research concerning the same offences, more exactly concerning the hypothesis on its perpetration against a person interrelated with him accomplishing his job or social commitments. Finally, we found important to analyze the perpetration hypothesis of intentional grave health or corporal battery/intentional midst health or corporal battery by two or more persons. Theoretical investigations are followed by relevant examples from the judicial practice. The prepared conclusion and references have the vocation to replace the informational vacuum concerning the render and the application of the disposals prevented at art.151 and art.152 PC RM. https://ojs.studiamsu.md/index.php/stiinte_sociale/article/view/4189
spellingShingle USM ADMIN
ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RM
Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
title ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RM
title_full ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RM
title_fullStr ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RM
title_full_unstemmed ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RM
title_short ANALIZA JURIDICO-PENALĂ A UNOR PREVEDERI ALE art.151 ŞI ALE art.152 CP RM
title_sort analiza juridico penala a unor prevederi ale art 151 si ale art 152 cp rm
url https://ojs.studiamsu.md/index.php/stiinte_sociale/article/view/4189
work_keys_str_mv AT usmadmin analizajuridicopenalaaunorprevederialeart151sialeart152cprm