Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?

<p>Morphological changes in coccoliths, tiny calcite platelets covering the outer surface of coccolithophores, can be induced by physiological responses to environmental changes. Coccoliths recovered from sedimentary successions may therefore provide information on paleo-environmental conditio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. Faucher, U. Riebesell, L. T. Bach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-06-01
Series:Climate of the Past
Online Access:https://www.clim-past.net/16/1007/2020/cp-16-1007-2020.pdf
_version_ 1819020326978191360
author G. Faucher
U. Riebesell
L. T. Bach
author_facet G. Faucher
U. Riebesell
L. T. Bach
author_sort G. Faucher
collection DOAJ
description <p>Morphological changes in coccoliths, tiny calcite platelets covering the outer surface of coccolithophores, can be induced by physiological responses to environmental changes. Coccoliths recovered from sedimentary successions may therefore provide information on paleo-environmental conditions prevailing at the time when the coccolithophores were alive. To calibrate the biomineralization responses of ancient coccolithophore to environmental changes, studies often compared the biological responses of living coccolithophore species with paleo-data from calcareous nannofossils. However, there is uncertainty whether the morphological responses of living coccolithophores are representative of those of the fossilized ancestors. To investigate this, we exposed four living coccolithophore species (<i>Emiliania huxleyi, Gephyrocapsa oceanica</i>, <i>Coccolithus pelagicus</i> subsp. <i>braarudii</i>, and <i>Pleurochrysis carterae)</i> that have been evolutionarily distinct for hundreds of thousands to millions of years, to a range of environmental conditions (i.e., changing light intensity, <span class="inline-formula">Mg∕Ca</span> ratio, nutrient availability, temperature, and carbonate chemistry) and evaluated their responses in coccolith morphology (i.e., size, length, width, malformation). The motivation for this study was to test if there is a consistent morphological response of the four species to changes in any of the tested abiotic environmental factors. If this was the case, then this could suggest that coccolith morphology can serve as a paleo-proxy for that specific factor because this response is conserved across species that have been evolutionary distinct over geological timescales. However, we found that the four species responded differently to changing light intensity, <span class="inline-formula">Mg∕Ca</span> ratio, nutrient availability, and temperature in terms of coccolith morphology. The lack of a common response reveals the difficulties in using coccolith morphology as a paleo-proxy for these environmental drivers. However, a common response was observed under changing seawater carbonate chemistry (i.e., rising <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>), which consistently induced malformations. This commonality provides some confidence that malformations found in the sedimentary record could be indicative of adverse carbonate chemistry conditions.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-21T03:49:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60bac58e659b4f54a3764b16c943178e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1814-9324
1814-9332
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T03:49:26Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Climate of the Past
spelling doaj.art-60bac58e659b4f54a3764b16c943178e2022-12-21T19:17:01ZengCopernicus PublicationsClimate of the Past1814-93241814-93322020-06-01161007102510.5194/cp-16-1007-2020Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?G. Faucher0U. Riebesell1L. T. Bach2Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “Ardito Desio”, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20133, ItalyBiological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel 24105, GermanyInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia<p>Morphological changes in coccoliths, tiny calcite platelets covering the outer surface of coccolithophores, can be induced by physiological responses to environmental changes. Coccoliths recovered from sedimentary successions may therefore provide information on paleo-environmental conditions prevailing at the time when the coccolithophores were alive. To calibrate the biomineralization responses of ancient coccolithophore to environmental changes, studies often compared the biological responses of living coccolithophore species with paleo-data from calcareous nannofossils. However, there is uncertainty whether the morphological responses of living coccolithophores are representative of those of the fossilized ancestors. To investigate this, we exposed four living coccolithophore species (<i>Emiliania huxleyi, Gephyrocapsa oceanica</i>, <i>Coccolithus pelagicus</i> subsp. <i>braarudii</i>, and <i>Pleurochrysis carterae)</i> that have been evolutionarily distinct for hundreds of thousands to millions of years, to a range of environmental conditions (i.e., changing light intensity, <span class="inline-formula">Mg∕Ca</span> ratio, nutrient availability, temperature, and carbonate chemistry) and evaluated their responses in coccolith morphology (i.e., size, length, width, malformation). The motivation for this study was to test if there is a consistent morphological response of the four species to changes in any of the tested abiotic environmental factors. If this was the case, then this could suggest that coccolith morphology can serve as a paleo-proxy for that specific factor because this response is conserved across species that have been evolutionary distinct over geological timescales. However, we found that the four species responded differently to changing light intensity, <span class="inline-formula">Mg∕Ca</span> ratio, nutrient availability, and temperature in terms of coccolith morphology. The lack of a common response reveals the difficulties in using coccolith morphology as a paleo-proxy for these environmental drivers. However, a common response was observed under changing seawater carbonate chemistry (i.e., rising <span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>), which consistently induced malformations. This commonality provides some confidence that malformations found in the sedimentary record could be indicative of adverse carbonate chemistry conditions.</p>https://www.clim-past.net/16/1007/2020/cp-16-1007-2020.pdf
spellingShingle G. Faucher
U. Riebesell
L. T. Bach
Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?
Climate of the Past
title Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?
title_full Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?
title_fullStr Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?
title_full_unstemmed Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?
title_short Can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past?
title_sort can morphological features of coccolithophores serve as a reliable proxy to reconstruct environmental conditions of the past
url https://www.clim-past.net/16/1007/2020/cp-16-1007-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gfaucher canmorphologicalfeaturesofcoccolithophoresserveasareliableproxytoreconstructenvironmentalconditionsofthepast
AT uriebesell canmorphologicalfeaturesofcoccolithophoresserveasareliableproxytoreconstructenvironmentalconditionsofthepast
AT ltbach canmorphologicalfeaturesofcoccolithophoresserveasareliableproxytoreconstructenvironmentalconditionsofthepast