Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Study

Introduction: Injury severity scoring can provide objective correlations with resource utilisation, such as length of stay and treatment costs, and inform clinical decisions regarding managing injuries of specific severity. The ability to predict survival after trauma is perhaps the most fundamental...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K Srinidhi, R Jai Vinod Kumar, M Reegan Jose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2023-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18020/60767_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(AG_SS)_PFA(SS)_PN(OM).pdf
_version_ 1797808879663316992
author K Srinidhi
R Jai Vinod Kumar
M Reegan Jose
author_facet K Srinidhi
R Jai Vinod Kumar
M Reegan Jose
author_sort K Srinidhi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Injury severity scoring can provide objective correlations with resource utilisation, such as length of stay and treatment costs, and inform clinical decisions regarding managing injuries of specific severity. The ability to predict survival after trauma is perhaps the most fundamental use of injury severity scoring. Aim: To compare the efficacy of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in the prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Materials and Methods: In this comparative prospective observational study conducted in the Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from April 2021 to September 2022 in 400 trauma patients who were clinically assessed and managed per the latest Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines (10th edition). After the stabilisation of the patient, RTS, ISS, NISS and TRISS was obtained from the trauma chart, imaging studies and intraoperative findings. Statistical analysis was done using the statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Results: Most trauma patients showed more blunt injuries 284 (71.0%) than penetrating injuries 116 (29.0%). The major trauma region was external 161 (40.3%), followed by extremity 124 (31.0%). The mortality rate in this study was 17 (4.3%). The cut-off points for predicting mortality in trauma patients in ISS, RTS, NISS and TRISS systems were 22, 6.8, 28.5, 87.95 with sensitivity of 94.12%, 88.24%, 88.24%, 100.00% and specificity of 94.78%, 94.52%, 92.95%, 95.56%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the current study’s findings, TRISS was a more accurate prognosticator among trauma patients.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:44:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60c182479372422290f36acf7260af35
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:44:14Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-60c182479372422290f36acf7260af352023-06-08T10:34:03ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2023-06-01176PC10PC1310.7860/JCDR/2023/60767.18020Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative StudyK Srinidhi0R Jai Vinod Kumar1M Reegan Jose2Postgraduate, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Professor, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Introduction: Injury severity scoring can provide objective correlations with resource utilisation, such as length of stay and treatment costs, and inform clinical decisions regarding managing injuries of specific severity. The ability to predict survival after trauma is perhaps the most fundamental use of injury severity scoring. Aim: To compare the efficacy of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in the prediction of mortality in trauma patients. Materials and Methods: In this comparative prospective observational study conducted in the Department of General Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India from April 2021 to September 2022 in 400 trauma patients who were clinically assessed and managed per the latest Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines (10th edition). After the stabilisation of the patient, RTS, ISS, NISS and TRISS was obtained from the trauma chart, imaging studies and intraoperative findings. Statistical analysis was done using the statistical software Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Results: Most trauma patients showed more blunt injuries 284 (71.0%) than penetrating injuries 116 (29.0%). The major trauma region was external 161 (40.3%), followed by extremity 124 (31.0%). The mortality rate in this study was 17 (4.3%). The cut-off points for predicting mortality in trauma patients in ISS, RTS, NISS and TRISS systems were 22, 6.8, 28.5, 87.95 with sensitivity of 94.12%, 88.24%, 88.24%, 100.00% and specificity of 94.78%, 94.52%, 92.95%, 95.56%, respectively. Conclusion: According to the current study’s findings, TRISS was a more accurate prognosticator among trauma patients.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18020/60767_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(AG_SS)_PFA(SS)_PN(OM).pdfanatomicalmortality ratephysiologicalprognosticatorreceiver operating curve
spellingShingle K Srinidhi
R Jai Vinod Kumar
M Reegan Jose
Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Study
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
anatomical
mortality rate
physiological
prognosticator
receiver operating curve
title Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Study
title_full Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Study
title_short Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score and Trauma Revised Injury Severity Score among Trauma Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Comparative Study
title_sort revised trauma score injury severity score new injury severity score and trauma revised injury severity score among trauma patients in a tertiary care hospital a comparative study
topic anatomical
mortality rate
physiological
prognosticator
receiver operating curve
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/18020/60767_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(AG_SS)_PFA(SS)_PN(OM).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ksrinidhi revisedtraumascoreinjuryseverityscorenewinjuryseverityscoreandtraumarevisedinjuryseverityscoreamongtraumapatientsinatertiarycarehospitalacomparativestudy
AT rjaivinodkumar revisedtraumascoreinjuryseverityscorenewinjuryseverityscoreandtraumarevisedinjuryseverityscoreamongtraumapatientsinatertiarycarehospitalacomparativestudy
AT mreeganjose revisedtraumascoreinjuryseverityscorenewinjuryseverityscoreandtraumarevisedinjuryseverityscoreamongtraumapatientsinatertiarycarehospitalacomparativestudy