LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry

Summary: There has been a notable disagreement between life cycle GHG emission estimates reported by research communities and key energy sector stakeholders as many LCA models are not validated against real operation data. This is originated from lack of collaboration and knowledge exchange between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad S. Masnadi, Kyle McGaughy, Jillian Falls, Tyler Tarnoczi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-02-01
Series:iScience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222021320
_version_ 1797903378791006208
author Mohammad S. Masnadi
Kyle McGaughy
Jillian Falls
Tyler Tarnoczi
author_facet Mohammad S. Masnadi
Kyle McGaughy
Jillian Falls
Tyler Tarnoczi
author_sort Mohammad S. Masnadi
collection DOAJ
description Summary: There has been a notable disagreement between life cycle GHG emission estimates reported by research communities and key energy sector stakeholders as many LCA models are not validated against real operation data. This is originated from lack of collaboration and knowledge exchange between model developers and company experts. We present a pragmatic procedure for engaging company experts to advance the assumptions, models, and information used in an open-source LCA simulator (OPGEE). Using real operation and local emission factor data, two oil sands SAGD fields GHG emissions are compared rigorously against the scope 1 and 2 reported emissions. By introducing consistent region-specific input data, system boundaries, and assumptions, OPGEE carbon intensity estimates are within 1%–5% of reported data by companies. The system boundary expansion (e.g., expanding from direct emissions to also include offsite emissions from natural gas co-production, diluent source emission) impacts the GHG intensities estimates for both fields.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:31:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60ce2be2f38d4ba9b121fda327da4c40
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-0042
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:31:57Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series iScience
spelling doaj.art-60ce2be2f38d4ba9b121fda327da4c402023-02-19T04:26:30ZengElsevieriScience2589-00422023-02-01262105859LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industryMohammad S. Masnadi0Kyle McGaughy1Jillian Falls2Tyler Tarnoczi3Department of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O’Hara St, 940 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; CorrespondenceDepartment of Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O’Hara St, 940 Benedum Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USACenovus Energy Inc., Calgary, AB, CanadaCenovus Energy Inc., Calgary, AB, CanadaSummary: There has been a notable disagreement between life cycle GHG emission estimates reported by research communities and key energy sector stakeholders as many LCA models are not validated against real operation data. This is originated from lack of collaboration and knowledge exchange between model developers and company experts. We present a pragmatic procedure for engaging company experts to advance the assumptions, models, and information used in an open-source LCA simulator (OPGEE). Using real operation and local emission factor data, two oil sands SAGD fields GHG emissions are compared rigorously against the scope 1 and 2 reported emissions. By introducing consistent region-specific input data, system boundaries, and assumptions, OPGEE carbon intensity estimates are within 1%–5% of reported data by companies. The system boundary expansion (e.g., expanding from direct emissions to also include offsite emissions from natural gas co-production, diluent source emission) impacts the GHG intensities estimates for both fields.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222021320Energy ResourcesEnergy modelingEnvironmental Science
spellingShingle Mohammad S. Masnadi
Kyle McGaughy
Jillian Falls
Tyler Tarnoczi
LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry
iScience
Energy Resources
Energy modeling
Environmental Science
title LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry
title_full LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry
title_fullStr LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry
title_full_unstemmed LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry
title_short LCA model validation of SAGD facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry
title_sort lca model validation of sagd facilities with real operation data as a collaborative example between model developers and industry
topic Energy Resources
Energy modeling
Environmental Science
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222021320
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadsmasnadi lcamodelvalidationofsagdfacilitieswithrealoperationdataasacollaborativeexamplebetweenmodeldevelopersandindustry
AT kylemcgaughy lcamodelvalidationofsagdfacilitieswithrealoperationdataasacollaborativeexamplebetweenmodeldevelopersandindustry
AT jillianfalls lcamodelvalidationofsagdfacilitieswithrealoperationdataasacollaborativeexamplebetweenmodeldevelopersandindustry
AT tylertarnoczi lcamodelvalidationofsagdfacilitieswithrealoperationdataasacollaborativeexamplebetweenmodeldevelopersandindustry