Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite Imagery

Preservation of spectral and spatial information is an important requirement for most quantitative remote sensing applications. In this study, we use image quality metrics to evaluate the performance of several image fusion techniques to assess the spectral and spatial quality of pansharpened images...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paidamwoyo Mhangara, Willard Mapurisa, Naledzani Mudau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/5/1881
_version_ 1818920200835170304
author Paidamwoyo Mhangara
Willard Mapurisa
Naledzani Mudau
author_facet Paidamwoyo Mhangara
Willard Mapurisa
Naledzani Mudau
author_sort Paidamwoyo Mhangara
collection DOAJ
description Preservation of spectral and spatial information is an important requirement for most quantitative remote sensing applications. In this study, we use image quality metrics to evaluate the performance of several image fusion techniques to assess the spectral and spatial quality of pansharpened images. We evaluated twelve pansharpening algorithms in this study; the Local Mean and Variance Matching (IMVM) algorithm was the best in terms of spectral consistency and synthesis followed by the ratio component substitution (RCS) algorithm. Whereas the IMVM and RCS image fusion techniques showed better results compared to other pansharpening methods, it is pertinent to highlight that our study also showed the credibility of other pansharpening algorithms in terms of spatial and spectral consistency as shown by the high correlation coefficients achieved in all methods. We noted that the algorithms that ranked higher in terms of spectral consistency and synthesis were outperformed by other competing algorithms in terms of spatial consistency. The study, therefore, concludes that the selection of image fusion techniques is driven by the requirements of remote sensing application and a careful trade-off is necessary to account for the impact of scene radiometry, image sharpness, spatial and spectral consistency, and computational overhead.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T01:17:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60d5cdfb0007470691e4728433d17677
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T01:17:59Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-60d5cdfb0007470691e4728433d176772022-12-21T19:58:31ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172020-03-01105188110.3390/app10051881app10051881Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite ImageryPaidamwoyo Mhangara0Willard Mapurisa1Naledzani Mudau2South African National Space Agency, Innovation Hub, Pretoria 0087, Gauteng, South AfricaSouth African National Space Agency, Innovation Hub, Pretoria 0087, Gauteng, South AfricaSouth African National Space Agency, Innovation Hub, Pretoria 0087, Gauteng, South AfricaPreservation of spectral and spatial information is an important requirement for most quantitative remote sensing applications. In this study, we use image quality metrics to evaluate the performance of several image fusion techniques to assess the spectral and spatial quality of pansharpened images. We evaluated twelve pansharpening algorithms in this study; the Local Mean and Variance Matching (IMVM) algorithm was the best in terms of spectral consistency and synthesis followed by the ratio component substitution (RCS) algorithm. Whereas the IMVM and RCS image fusion techniques showed better results compared to other pansharpening methods, it is pertinent to highlight that our study also showed the credibility of other pansharpening algorithms in terms of spatial and spectral consistency as shown by the high correlation coefficients achieved in all methods. We noted that the algorithms that ranked higher in terms of spectral consistency and synthesis were outperformed by other competing algorithms in terms of spatial consistency. The study, therefore, concludes that the selection of image fusion techniques is driven by the requirements of remote sensing application and a careful trade-off is necessary to account for the impact of scene radiometry, image sharpness, spatial and spectral consistency, and computational overhead.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/5/1881pansharpeningimage fusionimage quality<i>satellite pour l’observation de la terre</i> (spot) 6spectral consistencyspatial consistencysynthesis
spellingShingle Paidamwoyo Mhangara
Willard Mapurisa
Naledzani Mudau
Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite Imagery
Applied Sciences
pansharpening
image fusion
image quality
<i>satellite pour l’observation de la terre</i> (spot) 6
spectral consistency
spatial consistency
synthesis
title Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite Imagery
title_full Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite Imagery
title_fullStr Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite Imagery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite Imagery
title_short Comparison of Image Fusion Techniques Using <i>Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre</i> (SPOT) 6 Satellite Imagery
title_sort comparison of image fusion techniques using i satellite pour l observation de la terre i spot 6 satellite imagery
topic pansharpening
image fusion
image quality
<i>satellite pour l’observation de la terre</i> (spot) 6
spectral consistency
spatial consistency
synthesis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/5/1881
work_keys_str_mv AT paidamwoyomhangara comparisonofimagefusiontechniquesusingisatellitepourlobservationdelaterreispot6satelliteimagery
AT willardmapurisa comparisonofimagefusiontechniquesusingisatellitepourlobservationdelaterreispot6satelliteimagery
AT naledzanimudau comparisonofimagefusiontechniquesusingisatellitepourlobservationdelaterreispot6satelliteimagery