Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review

Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an escalating global health issue with complex and dynamic interdependencies, high uncertainty and decision stakes, multiple drivers and stakeholders with diverse values and interests, and various aspects and outcomes. Addressing and combating th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abou Ali Vedadhir, Carla Rodrigues, Helen Lambert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1279-y
_version_ 1818610148441063424
author Abou Ali Vedadhir
Carla Rodrigues
Helen Lambert
author_facet Abou Ali Vedadhir
Carla Rodrigues
Helen Lambert
author_sort Abou Ali Vedadhir
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an escalating global health issue with complex and dynamic interdependencies, high uncertainty and decision stakes, multiple drivers and stakeholders with diverse values and interests, and various aspects and outcomes. Addressing and combating this critical global challenge requires the formation and establishment of an interdisciplinary research approach that goes beyond the biosciences principally concerned with antimicrobial resistance to include other relevant natural and social sciences. The objective of this study will be to review and map existing social science knowledge and literature relating to antimicrobial resistance. Methods The review team will undertake the scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and also the Joanna Briggs Institute methods manual. Publications in English (from 1998 onwards) will be searched using several databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Anthropological Plus, Sociological Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), PsycINFO and EconLit. Grey literature will also be searched (e.g. Google Scholar). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Publication types will include original articles, editorials, commentaries, protocols, and books in the social science research literature on AMR. All study designs (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods) will be included. A PRISMA Flow Diagram of search and study selection will be used to report final figures on included and excluded studies. To provide a descriptive summary of the literature, data will be collated, stored, and charted using Microsoft Excel software. The analysis will also involve identifying themes and gaps in the existing literature and summarizing, describing and displaying all pertinent information using thematic construction approaches including qualitative content analysis methods. Discussion This protocol describes a systematic method to identify, map, and synthesize social science research evidence on antimicrobial resistance. By mapping evidence and identifying potential knowledge gaps where further research is warranted, the resulting scoping review will provide useful insights for the design, implementation, and reorientation of future research agendas on AMR at multiple levels. Systematic review registration: This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF): https://osf.io/hyaem .
first_indexed 2024-12-16T15:09:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60d7451d06a444f5bed2c654dde6dbf9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T15:09:50Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-60d7451d06a444f5bed2c654dde6dbf92022-12-21T22:26:59ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532020-02-01911710.1186/s13643-020-1279-ySocial science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping reviewAbou Ali Vedadhir0Carla Rodrigues1Helen Lambert2Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of BristolAbstract Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an escalating global health issue with complex and dynamic interdependencies, high uncertainty and decision stakes, multiple drivers and stakeholders with diverse values and interests, and various aspects and outcomes. Addressing and combating this critical global challenge requires the formation and establishment of an interdisciplinary research approach that goes beyond the biosciences principally concerned with antimicrobial resistance to include other relevant natural and social sciences. The objective of this study will be to review and map existing social science knowledge and literature relating to antimicrobial resistance. Methods The review team will undertake the scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework and also the Joanna Briggs Institute methods manual. Publications in English (from 1998 onwards) will be searched using several databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Anthropological Plus, Sociological Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), PsycINFO and EconLit. Grey literature will also be searched (e.g. Google Scholar). Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. Publication types will include original articles, editorials, commentaries, protocols, and books in the social science research literature on AMR. All study designs (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods) will be included. A PRISMA Flow Diagram of search and study selection will be used to report final figures on included and excluded studies. To provide a descriptive summary of the literature, data will be collated, stored, and charted using Microsoft Excel software. The analysis will also involve identifying themes and gaps in the existing literature and summarizing, describing and displaying all pertinent information using thematic construction approaches including qualitative content analysis methods. Discussion This protocol describes a systematic method to identify, map, and synthesize social science research evidence on antimicrobial resistance. By mapping evidence and identifying potential knowledge gaps where further research is warranted, the resulting scoping review will provide useful insights for the design, implementation, and reorientation of future research agendas on AMR at multiple levels. Systematic review registration: This protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF): https://osf.io/hyaem .https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1279-ySocial science researchAntimicrobial resistance (AMR)Scoping review
spellingShingle Abou Ali Vedadhir
Carla Rodrigues
Helen Lambert
Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review
Systematic Reviews
Social science research
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
Scoping review
title Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review
title_full Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review
title_fullStr Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review
title_short Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review
title_sort social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance protocol for a scoping review
topic Social science research
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
Scoping review
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1279-y
work_keys_str_mv AT aboualivedadhir socialscienceresearchcontributionstoantimicrobialresistanceprotocolforascopingreview
AT carlarodrigues socialscienceresearchcontributionstoantimicrobialresistanceprotocolforascopingreview
AT helenlambert socialscienceresearchcontributionstoantimicrobialresistanceprotocolforascopingreview