A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry

Economic activities ascending from the use of PSAK 55 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards) are alleged to be the cause of the Indonesian bank system instability when facing the global financial crisis in 2008. PSAK 55 results in CKPN (allowance for impairment losses) allocation on a procycl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunitha Devi, I Gede Arya Wigarba, Nyoman Trisna Herawati, I Nyoman Putra Yasa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana 2021-04-01
Series:Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejournal.uksw.edu/jeb/article/view/4382
_version_ 1827788027741601792
author Sunitha Devi
I Gede Arya Wigarba
Nyoman Trisna Herawati
I Nyoman Putra Yasa
author_facet Sunitha Devi
I Gede Arya Wigarba
Nyoman Trisna Herawati
I Nyoman Putra Yasa
author_sort Sunitha Devi
collection DOAJ
description Economic activities ascending from the use of PSAK 55 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards) are alleged to be the cause of the Indonesian bank system instability when facing the global financial crisis in 2008. PSAK 55 results in CKPN (allowance for impairment losses) allocation on a procyclical nature. Therefore, it is expected that   PSAK 71 implementation avoids procyclical CKPN that does not reflect sustainable financial performance. The current study is conducted to test the effectiveness of PSAK 71 implementation in hindering procyclical and credit crunch mitigation. The study’s population is the banking industry listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2020. The data are then descriptively analyzed using descriptive analysis and the Wilcoxon Rank Test. The findings show that: 1) there is a significant difference in CKPN between PSAK 55 and PSAK 71 implementations, with no significant difference in the CAR and profit values, 2) there is no significant difference in the CKPN value applied based on PSAK 71 before and after entering the COVID-19 pandemic, and 3) there are significant differences in credit disbursement during the 2008 crisis and the 2020 crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:01:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60d78f6024224974a3c640d22f53f7a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1979-6471
2528-0147
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T17:01:15Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
record_format Article
series Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis
spelling doaj.art-60d78f6024224974a3c640d22f53f7a52023-10-20T08:40:18ZengUniversitas Kristen Satya WacanaJurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis1979-64712528-01472021-04-0124117318810.24914/jeb.v24i1.43824681A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industrySunitha Devi0I Gede Arya Wigarba1Nyoman Trisna Herawati2I Nyoman Putra Yasa3Faculty of Eonomics, Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaFaculty of Eonomics, Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaFaculty of Eonomics, Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaFaculty of Eonomics, Universitas Pendidikan GaneshaEconomic activities ascending from the use of PSAK 55 (Statement of Financial Accounting Standards) are alleged to be the cause of the Indonesian bank system instability when facing the global financial crisis in 2008. PSAK 55 results in CKPN (allowance for impairment losses) allocation on a procyclical nature. Therefore, it is expected that   PSAK 71 implementation avoids procyclical CKPN that does not reflect sustainable financial performance. The current study is conducted to test the effectiveness of PSAK 71 implementation in hindering procyclical and credit crunch mitigation. The study’s population is the banking industry listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2020. The data are then descriptively analyzed using descriptive analysis and the Wilcoxon Rank Test. The findings show that: 1) there is a significant difference in CKPN between PSAK 55 and PSAK 71 implementations, with no significant difference in the CAR and profit values, 2) there is no significant difference in the CKPN value applied based on PSAK 71 before and after entering the COVID-19 pandemic, and 3) there are significant differences in credit disbursement during the 2008 crisis and the 2020 crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic.https://ejournal.uksw.edu/jeb/article/view/4382psak 71ckpncredit crunch
spellingShingle Sunitha Devi
I Gede Arya Wigarba
Nyoman Trisna Herawati
I Nyoman Putra Yasa
A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry
Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis
psak 71
ckpn
credit crunch
title A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry
title_full A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry
title_fullStr A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry
title_short A comparison between PSAK 71 and PSAK 55 in the banking industry
title_sort comparison between psak 71 and psak 55 in the banking industry
topic psak 71
ckpn
credit crunch
url https://ejournal.uksw.edu/jeb/article/view/4382
work_keys_str_mv AT sunithadevi acomparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry
AT igedearyawigarba acomparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry
AT nyomantrisnaherawati acomparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry
AT inyomanputrayasa acomparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry
AT sunithadevi comparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry
AT igedearyawigarba comparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry
AT nyomantrisnaherawati comparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry
AT inyomanputrayasa comparisonbetweenpsak71andpsak55inthebankingindustry