Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa

An important step in the sea ice freeboard to thickness conversion is the classification of sea ice types, since the ice type affects the snow depth and ice density. Studies using Ku-band CryoSat-2 have shown promise in distinguishing FYI and MYI based on the parametrisation of the radar echo. Here,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen, Eero Rinne, Henriette Skourup
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3183
_version_ 1797522148970987520
author Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Eero Rinne
Henriette Skourup
author_facet Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Eero Rinne
Henriette Skourup
author_sort Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
collection DOAJ
description An important step in the sea ice freeboard to thickness conversion is the classification of sea ice types, since the ice type affects the snow depth and ice density. Studies using Ku-band CryoSat-2 have shown promise in distinguishing FYI and MYI based on the parametrisation of the radar echo. Here, we investigate applying the same classification algorithms that have shown success for Ku-band measurements to measurements acquired by SARAL/AltiKa at the Ka-band. Four different classifiers are investigated, i.e., the threshold-based, Bayesian, Random Forest (RF) and <i>k</i>-nearest neighbour (KNN), by using data from five 35 day cycles during Arctic mid-winter in 2014–2018. The overall classification performance shows the highest accuracy of 93% for FYI (Bayesian classifier) and 39% for MYI (threshold-based classifier). For all classification algorithms, more than half of the MYI cover falsely classifies as FYI, showing the difference in the surface characteristics attainable by Ka-band compared to Ku-band due to different scattering mechanisms. However, high overall classification performance (above 90%) is estimated for FYI for three supervised classifiers (KNN, RF and Bayesian). Furthermore, the leading-edge width parameter shows potential in discriminating open water (ocean) and sea ice when visually compared with reference data. Our results encourage the use of waveform parameters in the further validation of sea ice/open water edges and discrimination of sea ice types combining Ka- and Ku-band, especially with the planned launch of the dual-frequency altimeter mission Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL) in 2027.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:25:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60d973d4f66249e2a19b4774464914b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:25:22Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-60d973d4f66249e2a19b4774464914b52023-11-22T09:33:24ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-08-011316318310.3390/rs13163183Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKaRenée Mie Fredensborg Hansen0Eero Rinne1Henriette Skourup2Marine Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, FinlandMarine Research, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, FinlandGeodesy and Earth Observation, DTU Space, Elektrovej, Building 327, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkAn important step in the sea ice freeboard to thickness conversion is the classification of sea ice types, since the ice type affects the snow depth and ice density. Studies using Ku-band CryoSat-2 have shown promise in distinguishing FYI and MYI based on the parametrisation of the radar echo. Here, we investigate applying the same classification algorithms that have shown success for Ku-band measurements to measurements acquired by SARAL/AltiKa at the Ka-band. Four different classifiers are investigated, i.e., the threshold-based, Bayesian, Random Forest (RF) and <i>k</i>-nearest neighbour (KNN), by using data from five 35 day cycles during Arctic mid-winter in 2014–2018. The overall classification performance shows the highest accuracy of 93% for FYI (Bayesian classifier) and 39% for MYI (threshold-based classifier). For all classification algorithms, more than half of the MYI cover falsely classifies as FYI, showing the difference in the surface characteristics attainable by Ka-band compared to Ku-band due to different scattering mechanisms. However, high overall classification performance (above 90%) is estimated for FYI for three supervised classifiers (KNN, RF and Bayesian). Furthermore, the leading-edge width parameter shows potential in discriminating open water (ocean) and sea ice when visually compared with reference data. Our results encourage the use of waveform parameters in the further validation of sea ice/open water edges and discrimination of sea ice types combining Ka- and Ku-band, especially with the planned launch of the dual-frequency altimeter mission Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL) in 2027.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3183SARAL/AltiKaradar echoesclassificationMYIFYIradar altimetry
spellingShingle Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
Eero Rinne
Henriette Skourup
Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa
Remote Sensing
SARAL/AltiKa
radar echoes
classification
MYI
FYI
radar altimetry
title Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa
title_full Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa
title_fullStr Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa
title_full_unstemmed Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa
title_short Classification of Sea Ice Types in the Arctic by Radar Echoes from SARAL/AltiKa
title_sort classification of sea ice types in the arctic by radar echoes from saral altika
topic SARAL/AltiKa
radar echoes
classification
MYI
FYI
radar altimetry
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/16/3183
work_keys_str_mv AT reneemiefredensborghansen classificationofseaicetypesinthearcticbyradarechoesfromsaralaltika
AT eerorinne classificationofseaicetypesinthearcticbyradarechoesfromsaralaltika
AT henrietteskourup classificationofseaicetypesinthearcticbyradarechoesfromsaralaltika