Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant

Abstract Background Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is classified in the antibody family that is recognized in antiphospholipid syndrome. Mixing tests are recommended for LA detection, and either a mixing test–specific cutoff (MTC) or index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) is used for the interpretation....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Osamu Kumano, Gary W. Moore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12245
_version_ 1797715575457185792
author Osamu Kumano
Gary W. Moore
author_facet Osamu Kumano
Gary W. Moore
author_sort Osamu Kumano
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is classified in the antibody family that is recognized in antiphospholipid syndrome. Mixing tests are recommended for LA detection, and either a mixing test–specific cutoff (MTC) or index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) is used for the interpretation. Although we previously showed MTC had higher sensitivity for LA than ICA, there are few studies investigating specificity. Objectives To investigate specificity of multiple activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) reagents for inhibitors using plasmas with non‐LA causes of prolonged clotting times, interpreted with MTC and ICA. Methods Seventy‐six factor‐deficient samples (either artificially prepared, hereditary deficiency, or warfarin), and 12 inhibitors (either coagulation factor inhibitors, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) were used. Samples were tested with 4 APTTs, 1 dilute APTT (dAPTT), and 2 dRVVT reagents, and all elevated screen ratios were followed up with mixing tests. Frequencies of corrected and not‐corrected results were calculated. Results The frequency of MTC and ICA corrected results, suggesting factor deficiency, were 5% to 43% and 79% to 100%, respectively, except for dAPTT, where MTC and ICA performed similarly. Frequencies of MTC and ICA not‐corrected results, suggesting inhibition, were 29% to 100% and 25% to 67%, respectively. Conclusions The data indicate that MTC has a tendency to generate not‐corrected mixing tests in factor‐deficient, warfarin, and other inhibitor samples, while ICA exhibited higher specificity. When we perform the mixing test and interpret the data, it is important to understand the characteristics of the indexes for maximizing the diagnostic potential of mixing test.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T08:08:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60e640b4695244c89ff3888e2aa6d74c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2475-0379
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T08:08:48Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
spelling doaj.art-60e640b4695244c89ff3888e2aa6d74c2023-09-02T19:17:34ZengElsevierResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis2475-03792019-10-013469570310.1002/rth2.12245Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulantOsamu Kumano0Gary W. Moore1Protein Technology Sysmex Corporation Kobe Hyogo JapanDepartment of Haemostasis and Thrombosis Viapath Analytics Guy's & St. Thomas’ Hospitals London UKAbstract Background Lupus anticoagulant (LA) is classified in the antibody family that is recognized in antiphospholipid syndrome. Mixing tests are recommended for LA detection, and either a mixing test–specific cutoff (MTC) or index of circulating anticoagulant (ICA) is used for the interpretation. Although we previously showed MTC had higher sensitivity for LA than ICA, there are few studies investigating specificity. Objectives To investigate specificity of multiple activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and diluted Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) reagents for inhibitors using plasmas with non‐LA causes of prolonged clotting times, interpreted with MTC and ICA. Methods Seventy‐six factor‐deficient samples (either artificially prepared, hereditary deficiency, or warfarin), and 12 inhibitors (either coagulation factor inhibitors, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) were used. Samples were tested with 4 APTTs, 1 dilute APTT (dAPTT), and 2 dRVVT reagents, and all elevated screen ratios were followed up with mixing tests. Frequencies of corrected and not‐corrected results were calculated. Results The frequency of MTC and ICA corrected results, suggesting factor deficiency, were 5% to 43% and 79% to 100%, respectively, except for dAPTT, where MTC and ICA performed similarly. Frequencies of MTC and ICA not‐corrected results, suggesting inhibition, were 29% to 100% and 25% to 67%, respectively. Conclusions The data indicate that MTC has a tendency to generate not‐corrected mixing tests in factor‐deficient, warfarin, and other inhibitor samples, while ICA exhibited higher specificity. When we perform the mixing test and interpret the data, it is important to understand the characteristics of the indexes for maximizing the diagnostic potential of mixing test.https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12245activated partial thromboplastin timeantiphospholipid antibodiesantiphospholipid syndromediluted Russell's viper venom timelupus anticoagulant
spellingShingle Osamu Kumano
Gary W. Moore
Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
activated partial thromboplastin time
antiphospholipid antibodies
antiphospholipid syndrome
diluted Russell's viper venom time
lupus anticoagulant
title Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_full Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_fullStr Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_full_unstemmed Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_short Ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test–specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
title_sort ruling out lupus anticoagulants with mixing test specific cutoff assessment and the index of circulating anticoagulant
topic activated partial thromboplastin time
antiphospholipid antibodies
antiphospholipid syndrome
diluted Russell's viper venom time
lupus anticoagulant
url https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12245
work_keys_str_mv AT osamukumano rulingoutlupusanticoagulantswithmixingtestspecificcutoffassessmentandtheindexofcirculatinganticoagulant
AT garywmoore rulingoutlupusanticoagulantswithmixingtestspecificcutoffassessmentandtheindexofcirculatinganticoagulant