Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model

To estimate microstructure-related parameters from diffusion MRI data, biophysical models make strong, simplifying assumptions about the underlying tissue. The extent to which many of these assumptions are valid remains an open research question. This study was inspired by the disparity between the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy FD Howard, Michiel Cottaar, Mark Drakesmith, Qiuyun Fan, Susie Y. Huang, Derek K. Jones, Frederik J. Lange, Jeroen Mollink, Suryanarayana Umesh Rudrapatna, Qiyuan Tian, Karla L Miller, Saad Jbabdi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-11-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811922006504
_version_ 1811215916744048640
author Amy FD Howard
Michiel Cottaar
Mark Drakesmith
Qiuyun Fan
Susie Y. Huang
Derek K. Jones
Frederik J. Lange
Jeroen Mollink
Suryanarayana Umesh Rudrapatna
Qiyuan Tian
Karla L Miller
Saad Jbabdi
author_facet Amy FD Howard
Michiel Cottaar
Mark Drakesmith
Qiuyun Fan
Susie Y. Huang
Derek K. Jones
Frederik J. Lange
Jeroen Mollink
Suryanarayana Umesh Rudrapatna
Qiyuan Tian
Karla L Miller
Saad Jbabdi
author_sort Amy FD Howard
collection DOAJ
description To estimate microstructure-related parameters from diffusion MRI data, biophysical models make strong, simplifying assumptions about the underlying tissue. The extent to which many of these assumptions are valid remains an open research question. This study was inspired by the disparity between the estimated intra-axonal axial diffusivity from literature and that typically assumed by the Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) model (d∥=1.7μm2/ms). We first demonstrate how changing the assumed axial diffusivity results in considerably different NODDI parameter estimates. Second, we illustrate the ability to estimate axial diffusivity as a free parameter of the model using high b-value data and an adapted NODDI framework. Using both simulated and in vivo data we investigate the impact of fitting to either real-valued or magnitude data, with Gaussian and Rician noise characteristics respectively, and what happens if we get the noise assumptions wrong in this high b-value and thus low SNR regime. Our results from real-valued human data estimate intra-axonal axial diffusivities of ∼2−2.5μm2/ms, in line with current literature. Crucially, our results demonstrate the importance of accounting for both a rectified noise floor and/or a signal offset to avoid biased parameter estimates when dealing with low SNR data.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:31:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60ebccdea499425c9fe378949fbeeb2e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1095-9572
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:31:22Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series NeuroImage
spelling doaj.art-60ebccdea499425c9fe378949fbeeb2e2022-12-22T03:44:01ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722022-11-01262119535Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI modelAmy FD Howard0Michiel Cottaar1Mark Drakesmith2Qiuyun Fan3Susie Y. Huang4Derek K. Jones5Frederik J. Lange6Jeroen Mollink7Suryanarayana Umesh Rudrapatna8Qiyuan Tian9Karla L Miller10Saad Jbabdi11Corresponding author.; FMRIB Centre, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomFMRIB Centre, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United KingdomAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Precision Instruments and Optoelectronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China; Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Medical College, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United StatesCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United KingdomFMRIB Centre, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomFMRIB Centre, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Philips Innovation Campus, Bangalore, IndiaAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United StatesFMRIB Centre, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomFMRIB Centre, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomTo estimate microstructure-related parameters from diffusion MRI data, biophysical models make strong, simplifying assumptions about the underlying tissue. The extent to which many of these assumptions are valid remains an open research question. This study was inspired by the disparity between the estimated intra-axonal axial diffusivity from literature and that typically assumed by the Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) model (d∥=1.7μm2/ms). We first demonstrate how changing the assumed axial diffusivity results in considerably different NODDI parameter estimates. Second, we illustrate the ability to estimate axial diffusivity as a free parameter of the model using high b-value data and an adapted NODDI framework. Using both simulated and in vivo data we investigate the impact of fitting to either real-valued or magnitude data, with Gaussian and Rician noise characteristics respectively, and what happens if we get the noise assumptions wrong in this high b-value and thus low SNR regime. Our results from real-valued human data estimate intra-axonal axial diffusivities of ∼2−2.5μm2/ms, in line with current literature. Crucially, our results demonstrate the importance of accounting for both a rectified noise floor and/or a signal offset to avoid biased parameter estimates when dealing with low SNR data.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811922006504Diffusion MRINODDIAxial diffusivityOrientation dispersionHigh b-valueWhite matter
spellingShingle Amy FD Howard
Michiel Cottaar
Mark Drakesmith
Qiuyun Fan
Susie Y. Huang
Derek K. Jones
Frederik J. Lange
Jeroen Mollink
Suryanarayana Umesh Rudrapatna
Qiyuan Tian
Karla L Miller
Saad Jbabdi
Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
NeuroImage
Diffusion MRI
NODDI
Axial diffusivity
Orientation dispersion
High b-value
White matter
title Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
title_full Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
title_fullStr Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
title_full_unstemmed Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
title_short Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
title_sort estimating axial diffusivity in the noddi model
topic Diffusion MRI
NODDI
Axial diffusivity
Orientation dispersion
High b-value
White matter
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811922006504
work_keys_str_mv AT amyfdhoward estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT michielcottaar estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT markdrakesmith estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT qiuyunfan estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT susieyhuang estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT derekkjones estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT frederikjlange estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT jeroenmollink estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT suryanarayanaumeshrudrapatna estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT qiyuantian estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT karlalmiller estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel
AT saadjbabdi estimatingaxialdiffusivityinthenoddimodel