Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents

Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calciumenriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amir Ahmad Ajami, Elmira Jafari Navimipour, Siavash Savadi Oskoee, Mehdi Abed Kahnamoui, Mehrdad Lotfi, Mehdi Daneshpooy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2013-08-01
Series:Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dentistry.tbzmed.ac.ir/joddd/index.php/joddd/article/view/464/304
_version_ 1818758272181600256
author Amir Ahmad Ajami
Elmira Jafari Navimipour
Siavash Savadi Oskoee
Mehdi Abed Kahnamoui
Mehrdad Lotfi
Mehdi Daneshpooy
author_facet Amir Ahmad Ajami
Elmira Jafari Navimipour
Siavash Savadi Oskoee
Mehdi Abed Kahnamoui
Mehrdad Lotfi
Mehdi Daneshpooy
author_sort Amir Ahmad Ajami
collection DOAJ
description Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calciumenriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:24:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-60fa5ab5677f43c58d069ba9edf46143
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-210X
2008-2118
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:24:11Z
publishDate 2013-08-01
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
spelling doaj.art-60fa5ab5677f43c58d069ba9edf461432022-12-21T21:18:05ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects2008-210X2008-21182013-08-017316416810.5681/joddd.2013.026Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping AgentsAmir Ahmad Ajami0 Elmira Jafari Navimipour1Siavash Savadi Oskoee2Mehdi Abed Kahnamoui3Mehrdad Lotfi4Mehdi Daneshpooy5Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran Associate professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran Associate professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran Professor, Department of Endodontic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran Assistant professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran Background and aims. Present study was designed to compare the bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) and composite resin to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), MTA mixed with Na2HPO4 (NAMTA), and calciumenriched mixture (CEM). Materials and methods. Thirty specimens of each CEM, NAMTA, and MTA were prepared. Composite and RMGI restorations were then placed on the samples (15 samples in six subgroups). Shear bond strength was assessed using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test. To compare the bond strength in subgroups, one-away ANOVA was applied. Significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results. Bond strength was significantly higher to composite samples compared to RMGI samples (p<0.001). The difference in bond strength of composite samples between MTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.026) as well as MTA and NAMTA subgroups (P= 0.019) was significant, but the difference between NAMTA and CEM subgroups (P=0.56) was not significant. The differences in bond strength in subgroups of RMGI group were not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. Regarding shear bond strength to the tested substrates, composite was shown to be superior to RMGI. The bond of resin composite to MTA was weaker than that to CEM and NAMTA.http://dentistry.tbzmed.ac.ir/joddd/index.php/joddd/article/view/464/304Resin compositeresin-modified glass ionomerMTAshear bond strength
spellingShingle Amir Ahmad Ajami
Elmira Jafari Navimipour
Siavash Savadi Oskoee
Mehdi Abed Kahnamoui
Mehrdad Lotfi
Mehdi Daneshpooy
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Resin composite
resin-modified glass ionomer
MTA
shear bond strength
title Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_full Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_fullStr Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_short Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Resin to Three Pulp Capping Agents
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer and composite resin to three pulp capping agents
topic Resin composite
resin-modified glass ionomer
MTA
shear bond strength
url http://dentistry.tbzmed.ac.ir/joddd/index.php/joddd/article/view/464/304
work_keys_str_mv AT amirahmadajami comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT elmirajafarinavimipour comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT siavashsavadioskoee comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT mehdiabedkahnamoui comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT mehrdadlotfi comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents
AT mehdidaneshpooy comparisonofshearbondstrengthofresinmodifiedglassionomerandcompositeresintothreepulpcappingagents