The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa.
The potential of beekeeping to mitigate the exposure of rural sub-Sahara African farmers to economic stochasticity has been widely promoted by an array of development agencies. Robust outcome indicators of the success of beekeeping to improve household well-being are unfortunately lacking. This stud...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5325527?pdf=render |
_version_ | 1819145922860285952 |
---|---|
author | Deborah Ruth Amulen Marijke D'Haese Elizabeth Ahikiriza Jacob Godfrey Agea Frans J Jacobs Dirk C de Graaf Guy Smagghe Paul Cross |
author_facet | Deborah Ruth Amulen Marijke D'Haese Elizabeth Ahikiriza Jacob Godfrey Agea Frans J Jacobs Dirk C de Graaf Guy Smagghe Paul Cross |
author_sort | Deborah Ruth Amulen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The potential of beekeeping to mitigate the exposure of rural sub-Sahara African farmers to economic stochasticity has been widely promoted by an array of development agencies. Robust outcome indicators of the success of beekeeping to improve household well-being are unfortunately lacking. This study aimed to identify the key drivers and barriers of beekeeping adoption at the household level, and quantified the associated income contribution in three agro-ecological zones in Uganda. Beekeepers were generally the most economically disadvantaged people in the study areas and tended to adopt beekeeping following contact with non-government organisations and access to training. Whilst incomes were not statistically lower than their non-beekeeping counterparts; their mean household well-being scores were significantly lower than non-beekeeping households. The inability of beekeeping to significantly improve well-being status can in part be attributed to a lack of both training in bee husbandry and protective equipment provision such as suits, gloves and smokers. These are critical tools for beekeepers as they provide the necessary confidence to manage honey bees. Rather than focussing solely on the socio-economic conditions of farmers to effectively adopt beekeeping, future research should also attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of development agencies' provision to the beekeeping sector. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:05:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-60fc5a7324a94a63beab13a3dda450ba |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T13:05:44Z |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-60fc5a7324a94a63beab13a3dda450ba2022-12-21T18:24:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01122e017282010.1371/journal.pone.0172820The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa.Deborah Ruth AmulenMarijke D'HaeseElizabeth AhikirizaJacob Godfrey AgeaFrans J JacobsDirk C de GraafGuy SmagghePaul CrossThe potential of beekeeping to mitigate the exposure of rural sub-Sahara African farmers to economic stochasticity has been widely promoted by an array of development agencies. Robust outcome indicators of the success of beekeeping to improve household well-being are unfortunately lacking. This study aimed to identify the key drivers and barriers of beekeeping adoption at the household level, and quantified the associated income contribution in three agro-ecological zones in Uganda. Beekeepers were generally the most economically disadvantaged people in the study areas and tended to adopt beekeeping following contact with non-government organisations and access to training. Whilst incomes were not statistically lower than their non-beekeeping counterparts; their mean household well-being scores were significantly lower than non-beekeeping households. The inability of beekeeping to significantly improve well-being status can in part be attributed to a lack of both training in bee husbandry and protective equipment provision such as suits, gloves and smokers. These are critical tools for beekeepers as they provide the necessary confidence to manage honey bees. Rather than focussing solely on the socio-economic conditions of farmers to effectively adopt beekeeping, future research should also attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of development agencies' provision to the beekeeping sector.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5325527?pdf=render |
spellingShingle | Deborah Ruth Amulen Marijke D'Haese Elizabeth Ahikiriza Jacob Godfrey Agea Frans J Jacobs Dirk C de Graaf Guy Smagghe Paul Cross The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE |
title | The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. |
title_full | The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. |
title_fullStr | The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. |
title_full_unstemmed | The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. |
title_short | The buzz about bees and poverty alleviation: Identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub-Saharan Africa. |
title_sort | buzz about bees and poverty alleviation identifying drivers and barriers of beekeeping in sub saharan africa |
url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5325527?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deborahruthamulen thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT marijkedhaese thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT elizabethahikiriza thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT jacobgodfreyagea thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT fransjjacobs thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT dirkcdegraaf thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT guysmagghe thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT paulcross thebuzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT deborahruthamulen buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT marijkedhaese buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT elizabethahikiriza buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT jacobgodfreyagea buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT fransjjacobs buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT dirkcdegraaf buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT guysmagghe buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica AT paulcross buzzaboutbeesandpovertyalleviationidentifyingdriversandbarriersofbeekeepinginsubsaharanafrica |