Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn Dossier

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 589-598 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Case overview. - III. Insights from the dossier. - III.1. Documents in the dossier. - III.2. References to political and domestic policies. - III.3. Infl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca Munro, Rebecca Williams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) 2021-07-01
Series:European Papers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/caught-in-redact-insights-van-duyn-dossier
_version_ 1818883861495414784
author Rebecca Munro
Rebecca Williams
author_facet Rebecca Munro
Rebecca Williams
author_sort Rebecca Munro
collection DOAJ
description (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 589-598 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Case overview. - III. Insights from the dossier. - III.1. Documents in the dossier. - III.2. References to political and domestic policies. - III.3. Influential actors in Van Duyn. - III.4. Methodological issues with redaction. - IV. Conclusion. | (Abstract) Van Duyn v Home Office (case 41/74) was the UK's first preliminary reference procedure case and is best known for its role in developing the meaning of direct effect, free movement of workers and public policy under EU law. The Court of Justice in the Archives project sought to find the "added value" of analysing the dossier de procédure alongside already publicly available documents relating to landmark EU cases. In the case of Van Duyn, the dossier did provide some additional insight into the case, such as the inclusion of the UK's High Court decision and references to the UK's domestic political context and policy making. However, the dossier largely reflected already publicly available documents relating to the case, demonstrating the transparency of the Court's decision-making process. This being said, 11 per cent of the dossier was redacted, potentially undermining this Article's aforementioned conclusion. Here, finding the balance between protecting the privacy of individuals and the secrecy of the Court with ensuring public transparency and subsequent academic investigation was particularly apparent. Nonetheless, being granted access to redacted documents would be beneficial to achieve the full potential of the dossier when using the archives of the Court of Justice for research.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T15:40:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-610a944abec645b4952826e6c7fc093c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2499-8249
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T15:40:23Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
record_format Article
series European Papers
spelling doaj.art-610a944abec645b4952826e6c7fc093c2022-12-21T20:15:29ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492021-07-012021 6158959810.15166/2499-8249/487Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn DossierRebecca Munro0Rebecca Williams1European University InstituteEuropean University Institute(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(1), 589-598 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Case overview. - III. Insights from the dossier. - III.1. Documents in the dossier. - III.2. References to political and domestic policies. - III.3. Influential actors in Van Duyn. - III.4. Methodological issues with redaction. - IV. Conclusion. | (Abstract) Van Duyn v Home Office (case 41/74) was the UK's first preliminary reference procedure case and is best known for its role in developing the meaning of direct effect, free movement of workers and public policy under EU law. The Court of Justice in the Archives project sought to find the "added value" of analysing the dossier de procédure alongside already publicly available documents relating to landmark EU cases. In the case of Van Duyn, the dossier did provide some additional insight into the case, such as the inclusion of the UK's High Court decision and references to the UK's domestic political context and policy making. However, the dossier largely reflected already publicly available documents relating to the case, demonstrating the transparency of the Court's decision-making process. This being said, 11 per cent of the dossier was redacted, potentially undermining this Article's aforementioned conclusion. Here, finding the balance between protecting the privacy of individuals and the secrecy of the Court with ensuring public transparency and subsequent academic investigation was particularly apparent. Nonetheless, being granted access to redacted documents would be beneficial to achieve the full potential of the dossier when using the archives of the Court of Justice for research.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/caught-in-redact-insights-van-duyn-dossierdirect effectfree movement of workersnon-discriminationpublic policyart. 48 eecart. 3 directive 64/2
spellingShingle Rebecca Munro
Rebecca Williams
Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn Dossier
European Papers
direct effect
free movement of workers
non-discrimination
public policy
art. 48 eec
art. 3 directive 64/2
title Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn Dossier
title_full Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn Dossier
title_fullStr Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn Dossier
title_full_unstemmed Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn Dossier
title_short Caught in the (Red)act: Insights from the Van Duyn Dossier
title_sort caught in the red act insights from the van duyn dossier
topic direct effect
free movement of workers
non-discrimination
public policy
art. 48 eec
art. 3 directive 64/2
url https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/caught-in-redact-insights-van-duyn-dossier
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccamunro caughtintheredactinsightsfromthevanduyndossier
AT rebeccawilliams caughtintheredactinsightsfromthevanduyndossier