Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional Preferences

In terms of role assignment and informational characteristics, different contexts have been used when measuring distributional preferences. This could be problematic as contextual variance may inadvertently muddle the measurement process. We use a within-subjects design and systemically vary role as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Greiff, Kurt A. Ackermann, Ryan O. Murphy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-10-01
Series:Games
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/9/4/80
_version_ 1819128764649439232
author Matthias Greiff
Kurt A. Ackermann
Ryan O. Murphy
author_facet Matthias Greiff
Kurt A. Ackermann
Ryan O. Murphy
author_sort Matthias Greiff
collection DOAJ
description In terms of role assignment and informational characteristics, different contexts have been used when measuring distributional preferences. This could be problematic as contextual variance may inadvertently muddle the measurement process. We use a within-subjects design and systemically vary role assignment as well as the way information is displayed to subjects when measuring distributional preferences in resource allocation tasks as well as proper games. Specifically we examine choice behavior in the contexts of role certainty, role uncertainty, decomposed games, and matrix games. Results show that there is large heterogeneity in the choices people make when deciding how to allocate resources between themselves and some other person under different contextual frames. For instance, people make more prosocial choices under role uncertainty as compared to role certainty. Furthermore, altering the way information is displayed given a particular situation can have a more dramatic effect on choice behavior than altering the situation itself. That is, depending on how information is displayed, people may behave as if they would perform a non-strategic decision making task when in fact they are playing a proper game characterized by strategic interdependence.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T08:33:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6124a13d75374caabcf868b81d3b0380
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4336
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T08:33:01Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Games
spelling doaj.art-6124a13d75374caabcf868b81d3b03802022-12-21T18:32:26ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362018-10-01948010.3390/g9040080g9040080Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional PreferencesMatthias Greiff0Kurt A. Ackermann1Ryan O. Murphy2Institute of Management and Economics, Clausthal University of Technology, Julius-Albert-Str. 2, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, GermanyZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Stadthausstrasse 14, 8400 Winterthur, SwitzerlandDepartment of Economics, University of Zurich, Blümlisalpstrasse 10, 8006 Zurich, SwitzerlandIn terms of role assignment and informational characteristics, different contexts have been used when measuring distributional preferences. This could be problematic as contextual variance may inadvertently muddle the measurement process. We use a within-subjects design and systemically vary role assignment as well as the way information is displayed to subjects when measuring distributional preferences in resource allocation tasks as well as proper games. Specifically we examine choice behavior in the contexts of role certainty, role uncertainty, decomposed games, and matrix games. Results show that there is large heterogeneity in the choices people make when deciding how to allocate resources between themselves and some other person under different contextual frames. For instance, people make more prosocial choices under role uncertainty as compared to role certainty. Furthermore, altering the way information is displayed given a particular situation can have a more dramatic effect on choice behavior than altering the situation itself. That is, depending on how information is displayed, people may behave as if they would perform a non-strategic decision making task when in fact they are playing a proper game characterized by strategic interdependence.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/9/4/80distributional preferencesframingindividual differencesother regarding preferencessocial preferencesSocial Value Orientation (SVO)
spellingShingle Matthias Greiff
Kurt A. Ackermann
Ryan O. Murphy
Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional Preferences
Games
distributional preferences
framing
individual differences
other regarding preferences
social preferences
Social Value Orientation (SVO)
title Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional Preferences
title_full Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional Preferences
title_fullStr Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional Preferences
title_short Playing a Game or Making a Decision? Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Distributional Preferences
title_sort playing a game or making a decision methodological issues in the measurement of distributional preferences
topic distributional preferences
framing
individual differences
other regarding preferences
social preferences
Social Value Orientation (SVO)
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/9/4/80
work_keys_str_mv AT matthiasgreiff playingagameormakingadecisionmethodologicalissuesinthemeasurementofdistributionalpreferences
AT kurtaackermann playingagameormakingadecisionmethodologicalissuesinthemeasurementofdistributionalpreferences
AT ryanomurphy playingagameormakingadecisionmethodologicalissuesinthemeasurementofdistributionalpreferences