Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?

Abstract When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant‐lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiawei Zuo, A. Alexander G. Webb, Emily J. Chin, Lukáš Ackerman, Jason Harvey, Peter J. Haproff, Thomas Müller, Qin Wang, Arthur H. Hickman, Dominik Sorger, Anthony Ramírez‐Salazar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519
_version_ 1797638007661002752
author Jiawei Zuo
A. Alexander G. Webb
Emily J. Chin
Lukáš Ackerman
Jason Harvey
Peter J. Haproff
Thomas Müller
Qin Wang
Arthur H. Hickman
Dominik Sorger
Anthony Ramírez‐Salazar
author_facet Jiawei Zuo
A. Alexander G. Webb
Emily J. Chin
Lukáš Ackerman
Jason Harvey
Peter J. Haproff
Thomas Müller
Qin Wang
Arthur H. Hickman
Dominik Sorger
Anthony Ramírez‐Salazar
author_sort Jiawei Zuo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant‐lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland), some phaneritic ultramafic rocks have been dominantly interpreted as subduction‐related, tectonically‐exhumed mantle slices or cumulates. Here, we compared Eoarchean phaneritic ultramafic rocks from the Isua supracrustal belt with mantle peridotites, cumulates, and phaneritic ultramafic samples from the Paleoarchean East Pilbara Terrane (Australia), which is widely interpreted to have formed in non‐plate tectonic settings. Our findings show that Pilbara samples have cumulate and polygonal textures, melt‐enriched trace element patterns, relative enrichment of Os, Ir, and Ru versus Pt and Pd, and chromite‐spinel with variable TiO2 and Mg#, and relatively consistent Cr#. Both, new and existing data show that cumulates and mantle rocks potentially have similar whole‐rock geochemical characteristics, deformation fabrics, and alteration features. Geochemical modeling results indicate that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks have interacted with low‐Pt and Pd melts generated by sequestration of Pd and Pt into sulphide and/or alloy during magmatism. Such melts cannot have interacted with a mantle wedge. Correspondingly, geochemical compositions and rock textures suggest that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks are not tectonically‐exhumed mantle peridotites, but are cumulates that experienced metasomatism by fluids and co‐genetic melts. Because such rocks could have formed in either plate or non‐plate tectonic settings, they cannot be used to differentiate early Earth tectonic settings.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:56:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-612feeb1dd3f40cd8556d85c75b69d52
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:56:26Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj.art-612feeb1dd3f40cd8556d85c75b69d522023-11-03T17:00:34ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272022-12-012312n/an/a10.1029/2022GC010519Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?Jiawei Zuo0A. Alexander G. Webb1Emily J. Chin2Lukáš Ackerman3Jason Harvey4Peter J. Haproff5Thomas Müller6Qin Wang7Arthur H. Hickman8Dominik Sorger9Anthony Ramírez‐Salazar10Department of Earth Sciences and Laboratory for Space Research University of Hong Kong Hong Kong ChinaDepartment of Earth Sciences and Laboratory for Space Research University of Hong Kong Hong Kong ChinaScripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, San Diego La Jolla CA USAInstitute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences Prague 6 Czech RepublicSchool of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UKDepartment of Earth and Ocean Sciences University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington NC USADepartment of Mineralogy Geoscience Center Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen Göttingen GermanyState Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research School of Earth Sciences and Engineering Nanjing University Nanjing ChinaGeological Survey of Western Australia East Perth WA AustraliaDepartment of Mineralogy Geoscience Center Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen Göttingen GermanySchool of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UKAbstract When plate tectonics initiated remains uncertain, partly because many signals interpreted as diagnostic of plate tectonics can be alternatively explained via hot stagnant‐lid tectonics. One such signal involves the petrogenesis of early Archean phaneritic ultramafic rocks. In the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt (Greenland), some phaneritic ultramafic rocks have been dominantly interpreted as subduction‐related, tectonically‐exhumed mantle slices or cumulates. Here, we compared Eoarchean phaneritic ultramafic rocks from the Isua supracrustal belt with mantle peridotites, cumulates, and phaneritic ultramafic samples from the Paleoarchean East Pilbara Terrane (Australia), which is widely interpreted to have formed in non‐plate tectonic settings. Our findings show that Pilbara samples have cumulate and polygonal textures, melt‐enriched trace element patterns, relative enrichment of Os, Ir, and Ru versus Pt and Pd, and chromite‐spinel with variable TiO2 and Mg#, and relatively consistent Cr#. Both, new and existing data show that cumulates and mantle rocks potentially have similar whole‐rock geochemical characteristics, deformation fabrics, and alteration features. Geochemical modeling results indicate that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks have interacted with low‐Pt and Pd melts generated by sequestration of Pd and Pt into sulphide and/or alloy during magmatism. Such melts cannot have interacted with a mantle wedge. Correspondingly, geochemical compositions and rock textures suggest that Isua and Pilbara ultramafic rocks are not tectonically‐exhumed mantle peridotites, but are cumulates that experienced metasomatism by fluids and co‐genetic melts. Because such rocks could have formed in either plate or non‐plate tectonic settings, they cannot be used to differentiate early Earth tectonic settings.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519geochemistryIsuaPilbaraultramafic rockstectonicspetrogenesis
spellingShingle Jiawei Zuo
A. Alexander G. Webb
Emily J. Chin
Lukáš Ackerman
Jason Harvey
Peter J. Haproff
Thomas Müller
Qin Wang
Arthur H. Hickman
Dominik Sorger
Anthony Ramírez‐Salazar
Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
geochemistry
Isua
Pilbara
ultramafic rocks
tectonics
petrogenesis
title Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?
title_full Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?
title_fullStr Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?
title_full_unstemmed Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?
title_short Earth's Earliest Phaneritic Ultramafic Rocks: Mantle Slices or Crustal Cumulates?
title_sort earth s earliest phaneritic ultramafic rocks mantle slices or crustal cumulates
topic geochemistry
Isua
Pilbara
ultramafic rocks
tectonics
petrogenesis
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010519
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaweizuo earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT aalexandergwebb earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT emilyjchin earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT lukasackerman earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT jasonharvey earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT peterjhaproff earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT thomasmuller earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT qinwang earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT arthurhhickman earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT dominiksorger earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates
AT anthonyramirezsalazar earthsearliestphaneriticultramaficrocksmantleslicesorcrustalcumulates