Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A Review

This paper aims to review the performance analysis of interlocking concrete block pavement with by-products such as coconut fibers, and construction and demolition recycled materials, and to compare their skills with asphalt pavement, especially for light-traffic urban road applications. The focus i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Webert Silva, Luís Picado-Santos, Suelly Barroso, Antônio Eduardo Cabral, Ronaldo Stefanutti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-05-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/10/5846
_version_ 1827742269324656640
author Webert Silva
Luís Picado-Santos
Suelly Barroso
Antônio Eduardo Cabral
Ronaldo Stefanutti
author_facet Webert Silva
Luís Picado-Santos
Suelly Barroso
Antônio Eduardo Cabral
Ronaldo Stefanutti
author_sort Webert Silva
collection DOAJ
description This paper aims to review the performance analysis of interlocking concrete block pavement with by-products such as coconut fibers, and construction and demolition recycled materials, and to compare their skills with asphalt pavement, especially for light-traffic urban road applications. The focus is on mechanical behavior (mix parameters and the influence of by-products), pavement design, sustainability (the heat island effect), the management of contaminant concentrations within infiltration related to permeability, and Life Cycle Assessment. Considering the overall performance analysis, interlocking concrete block pavement was the most attractive alternative because it was approximately 33–44% cheaper in the maintenance process, cooler over a range of 2.2–15 °C, and more permeable by 0.4 cm/s to 0.6 cm/s than asphalt pavement, saving costs and improving drainage and human thermal comfort. However, asphalt pavement was around 35% cheaper during the construction phase (mainly due to energy consumption), and it presented a 32% lower nitrogen oxide concentration. This paper showed the advantages and disadvantages of both types of pavements. A further breakdown should be developed and integrated into the decision-making process about choosing between solutions.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T03:59:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6130bd881a4f4874a7fcadbb3ec091a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T03:59:33Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-6130bd881a4f4874a7fcadbb3ec091a32023-11-18T00:16:41ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172023-05-011310584610.3390/app13105846Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A ReviewWebert Silva0Luís Picado-Santos1Suelly Barroso2Antônio Eduardo Cabral3Ronaldo Stefanutti4CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, PortugalCERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, PortugalDepartment of Transportation Engineering, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza 60455-760, BrazilDepartment of Structural Engineering and Building, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza 60455-900, BrazilDepartment of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza 60455-900, BrazilThis paper aims to review the performance analysis of interlocking concrete block pavement with by-products such as coconut fibers, and construction and demolition recycled materials, and to compare their skills with asphalt pavement, especially for light-traffic urban road applications. The focus is on mechanical behavior (mix parameters and the influence of by-products), pavement design, sustainability (the heat island effect), the management of contaminant concentrations within infiltration related to permeability, and Life Cycle Assessment. Considering the overall performance analysis, interlocking concrete block pavement was the most attractive alternative because it was approximately 33–44% cheaper in the maintenance process, cooler over a range of 2.2–15 °C, and more permeable by 0.4 cm/s to 0.6 cm/s than asphalt pavement, saving costs and improving drainage and human thermal comfort. However, asphalt pavement was around 35% cheaper during the construction phase (mainly due to energy consumption), and it presented a 32% lower nitrogen oxide concentration. This paper showed the advantages and disadvantages of both types of pavements. A further breakdown should be developed and integrated into the decision-making process about choosing between solutions.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/10/5846interlocking concrete block pavementasphalt pavementby-productsperformance analysisLife Cycle Assessment
spellingShingle Webert Silva
Luís Picado-Santos
Suelly Barroso
Antônio Eduardo Cabral
Ronaldo Stefanutti
Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A Review
Applied Sciences
interlocking concrete block pavement
asphalt pavement
by-products
performance analysis
Life Cycle Assessment
title Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A Review
title_full Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A Review
title_fullStr Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A Review
title_short Assessment of Interlocking Concrete Block Pavement with By-Products and Comparison with an Asphalt Pavement: A Review
title_sort assessment of interlocking concrete block pavement with by products and comparison with an asphalt pavement a review
topic interlocking concrete block pavement
asphalt pavement
by-products
performance analysis
Life Cycle Assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/10/5846
work_keys_str_mv AT webertsilva assessmentofinterlockingconcreteblockpavementwithbyproductsandcomparisonwithanasphaltpavementareview
AT luispicadosantos assessmentofinterlockingconcreteblockpavementwithbyproductsandcomparisonwithanasphaltpavementareview
AT suellybarroso assessmentofinterlockingconcreteblockpavementwithbyproductsandcomparisonwithanasphaltpavementareview
AT antonioeduardocabral assessmentofinterlockingconcreteblockpavementwithbyproductsandcomparisonwithanasphaltpavementareview
AT ronaldostefanutti assessmentofinterlockingconcreteblockpavementwithbyproductsandcomparisonwithanasphaltpavementareview