Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File Activation

Background: Biofilm removal from the root canal during endodontic treatment is necessary to prevent further complications. Irrigation is essential to success. Several irrigants have been proposed without a proper comparison. The aim of the study is to compare the antibacterial capacity of different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alejandro Álvarez-Sagües, Nerea Herce, Ulises Amador, Francisco Llinares-Pinel, Estanislao Nistal-Villan, Jesús Presa, Laura Álvarez, Magdalena Azabal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Dentistry Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/4/41
_version_ 1797538186643111936
author Alejandro Álvarez-Sagües
Nerea Herce
Ulises Amador
Francisco Llinares-Pinel
Estanislao Nistal-Villan
Jesús Presa
Laura Álvarez
Magdalena Azabal
author_facet Alejandro Álvarez-Sagües
Nerea Herce
Ulises Amador
Francisco Llinares-Pinel
Estanislao Nistal-Villan
Jesús Presa
Laura Álvarez
Magdalena Azabal
author_sort Alejandro Álvarez-Sagües
collection DOAJ
description Background: Biofilm removal from the root canal during endodontic treatment is necessary to prevent further complications. Irrigation is essential to success. Several irrigants have been proposed without a proper comparison. The aim of the study is to compare the antibacterial capacity of different activated irrigants using passive ultrasonic activation (PUI) or XP-Endo finisher (XPF). Methods: A total of 100 instrumented teeth were incubated in an Eppendorf tube containing 0.5 McFarland of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and incubated for 2 weeks at 37 °C. Roots were divided into 5 groups (<i>n</i> = 20) according to the irrigant type: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (17%), ethydronic acid (HEDP) (9%) mixed with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), EDTA (17%) mixed with 5.25% NaOCl, PBS, and a control group. Each group was divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10): PUI and XPF. Results: As compared to the untreated control group, the irrigators included in the study had a significant effect in bacteria reduction. The obtained results show HEDP to be the most effective irrigant, since no bacteria were recovered after treatment of this group, followed by EDTA mixed with NaOCl and, finally, the EDTA-irrigated group. Conclusions: HEDP is the best irrigating agent in combination with XPF or PUI file activation to eliminate bacteria in our experimental model.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:27:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6136b0e042bb43a2b9d96c35f4c80873
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-6767
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:27:57Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Dentistry Journal
spelling doaj.art-6136b0e042bb43a2b9d96c35f4c808732023-11-21T14:53:50ZengMDPI AGDentistry Journal2304-67672021-04-01944110.3390/dj9040041Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File ActivationAlejandro Álvarez-Sagües0Nerea Herce1Ulises Amador2Francisco Llinares-Pinel3Estanislao Nistal-Villan4Jesús Presa5Laura Álvarez6Magdalena Azabal7Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, San Pablo CEU University, 28668 Madrid, SpainDentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, San Pablo CEU University, 28668 Madrid, SpainDepartamento de Química y Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Boadilla del Monte, 28668 Madrid, SpainMicrobiology Section, Departamento CC, Farmacéuticas y de la Salud, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Boadilla del Monte, 28668 Madrid, SpainMicrobiology Section, Departamento CC, Farmacéuticas y de la Salud, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Boadilla del Monte, 28668 Madrid, SpainIndependent Researcher, 28668 Madrid, SpainDentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, San Pablo CEU University, 28668 Madrid, SpainDentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, San Pablo CEU University, 28668 Madrid, SpainBackground: Biofilm removal from the root canal during endodontic treatment is necessary to prevent further complications. Irrigation is essential to success. Several irrigants have been proposed without a proper comparison. The aim of the study is to compare the antibacterial capacity of different activated irrigants using passive ultrasonic activation (PUI) or XP-Endo finisher (XPF). Methods: A total of 100 instrumented teeth were incubated in an Eppendorf tube containing 0.5 McFarland of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> and incubated for 2 weeks at 37 °C. Roots were divided into 5 groups (<i>n</i> = 20) according to the irrigant type: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (17%), ethydronic acid (HEDP) (9%) mixed with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), EDTA (17%) mixed with 5.25% NaOCl, PBS, and a control group. Each group was divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10): PUI and XPF. Results: As compared to the untreated control group, the irrigators included in the study had a significant effect in bacteria reduction. The obtained results show HEDP to be the most effective irrigant, since no bacteria were recovered after treatment of this group, followed by EDTA mixed with NaOCl and, finally, the EDTA-irrigated group. Conclusions: HEDP is the best irrigating agent in combination with XPF or PUI file activation to eliminate bacteria in our experimental model.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/4/41<i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>EDTAethydronic acid (HEDP)passive ultrasonic activation (PUI)Endo-XP finisher (XPF)
spellingShingle Alejandro Álvarez-Sagües
Nerea Herce
Ulises Amador
Francisco Llinares-Pinel
Estanislao Nistal-Villan
Jesús Presa
Laura Álvarez
Magdalena Azabal
Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File Activation
Dentistry Journal
<i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>
EDTA
ethydronic acid (HEDP)
passive ultrasonic activation (PUI)
Endo-XP finisher (XPF)
title Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File Activation
title_full Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File Activation
title_fullStr Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File Activation
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File Activation
title_short Efficacy of EDTA and HEDP Chelators in the Removal of Mature Biofilm of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> by PUI and XPF File Activation
title_sort efficacy of edta and hedp chelators in the removal of mature biofilm of i enterococcus faecalis i by pui and xpf file activation
topic <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>
EDTA
ethydronic acid (HEDP)
passive ultrasonic activation (PUI)
Endo-XP finisher (XPF)
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/4/41
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandroalvarezsagues efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation
AT nereaherce efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation
AT ulisesamador efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation
AT franciscollinarespinel efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation
AT estanislaonistalvillan efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation
AT jesuspresa efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation
AT lauraalvarez efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation
AT magdalenaazabal efficacyofedtaandhedpchelatorsintheremovalofmaturebiofilmofienterococcusfaecalisibypuiandxpffileactivation