NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing Fails

Molecular diagnostics has drastically improved the survival rate of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the last 10 years. Despite advancements in molecular testing, targeted therapies, and national guideline recommendations, more than half of NSCLC patients in the United...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leah Rowland Herdt, Paige Berroteran, Malini Rajagopalan, Bradley A. Brown, Jerrod J. Schwartz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/3/243
_version_ 1797318928691625984
author Leah Rowland Herdt
Paige Berroteran
Malini Rajagopalan
Bradley A. Brown
Jerrod J. Schwartz
author_facet Leah Rowland Herdt
Paige Berroteran
Malini Rajagopalan
Bradley A. Brown
Jerrod J. Schwartz
author_sort Leah Rowland Herdt
collection DOAJ
description Molecular diagnostics has drastically improved the survival rate of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the last 10 years. Despite advancements in molecular testing, targeted therapies, and national guideline recommendations, more than half of NSCLC patients in the United States either never receive testing or patient care is not informed via molecular testing. Here, we sought to explore the relationship between DNA/RNA input, the molecular testing method, and test success rates. On a shared set of low-input reference test materials (<i>n</i> = 3), we ran both a hybrid capture-based, next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay and a multiplexed digital PCR (dPCR) panel. The dPCR panel was highly sensitive and specific for low-input samples in dilution studies ranging from 40 to 1 ng DNA and from 20 to 2.5 ng RNA, while NGS had up to an 86% loss in sensitivity as contrived sample inputs were serially diluted. The dPCR panel also demonstrated a high PPA (>95%) at diluted inputs as low as 15/7.5 ng DNA/RNA on 23 banked clinical samples with the same NGS hybrid capture assay at a high input. These data suggest that digital PCR is an accurate and effective way of identifying clinically relevant NSCLC mutations at low nucleotide input and quality.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:59:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-613d124d33e749bda436c88fbb836185
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T03:59:33Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-613d124d33e749bda436c88fbb8361852024-02-09T15:09:56ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182024-01-0114324310.3390/diagnostics14030243NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing FailsLeah Rowland Herdt0Paige Berroteran1Malini Rajagopalan2Bradley A. Brown3Jerrod J. Schwartz4ChromaCode Inc., 2330 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USAChromaCode Inc., 2330 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USAChromaCode Inc., 2330 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USAChromaCode Inc., 2330 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USAChromaCode Inc., 2330 Faraday Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008, USAMolecular diagnostics has drastically improved the survival rate of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the last 10 years. Despite advancements in molecular testing, targeted therapies, and national guideline recommendations, more than half of NSCLC patients in the United States either never receive testing or patient care is not informed via molecular testing. Here, we sought to explore the relationship between DNA/RNA input, the molecular testing method, and test success rates. On a shared set of low-input reference test materials (<i>n</i> = 3), we ran both a hybrid capture-based, next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay and a multiplexed digital PCR (dPCR) panel. The dPCR panel was highly sensitive and specific for low-input samples in dilution studies ranging from 40 to 1 ng DNA and from 20 to 2.5 ng RNA, while NGS had up to an 86% loss in sensitivity as contrived sample inputs were serially diluted. The dPCR panel also demonstrated a high PPA (>95%) at diluted inputs as low as 15/7.5 ng DNA/RNA on 23 banked clinical samples with the same NGS hybrid capture assay at a high input. These data suggest that digital PCR is an accurate and effective way of identifying clinically relevant NSCLC mutations at low nucleotide input and quality.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/3/243NSCLCdPCRNGSQNS
spellingShingle Leah Rowland Herdt
Paige Berroteran
Malini Rajagopalan
Bradley A. Brown
Jerrod J. Schwartz
NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing Fails
Diagnostics
NSCLC
dPCR
NGS
QNS
title NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing Fails
title_full NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing Fails
title_fullStr NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing Fails
title_full_unstemmed NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing Fails
title_short NSCLC Digital PCR Panel Returns Low-Input Sample Results Where Sequencing Fails
title_sort nsclc digital pcr panel returns low input sample results where sequencing fails
topic NSCLC
dPCR
NGS
QNS
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/3/243
work_keys_str_mv AT leahrowlandherdt nsclcdigitalpcrpanelreturnslowinputsampleresultswheresequencingfails
AT paigeberroteran nsclcdigitalpcrpanelreturnslowinputsampleresultswheresequencingfails
AT malinirajagopalan nsclcdigitalpcrpanelreturnslowinputsampleresultswheresequencingfails
AT bradleyabrown nsclcdigitalpcrpanelreturnslowinputsampleresultswheresequencingfails
AT jerrodjschwartz nsclcdigitalpcrpanelreturnslowinputsampleresultswheresequencingfails