Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability

Abstract Although many studies have reported differences in epithelial paracellular Leak Pathway permeability following genetic manipulations and treatment with various agents, the basis for these differences remains mostly unclear. Two primary mechanisms which could underlie differences in Leak Pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashley Monaco, Josephine Axis, Kurt Amsler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-03-01
Series:Physiological Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15202
_version_ 1818367315619610624
author Ashley Monaco
Josephine Axis
Kurt Amsler
author_facet Ashley Monaco
Josephine Axis
Kurt Amsler
author_sort Ashley Monaco
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Although many studies have reported differences in epithelial paracellular Leak Pathway permeability following genetic manipulations and treatment with various agents, the basis for these differences remains mostly unclear. Two primary mechanisms which could underlie differences in Leak Pathway permeability are differences in the density of Leak Pathway openings and differences in the opening size. Using a computational approach, we demonstrate that these two possibilities can be readily distinguished graphically by comparing the apparent paracellular permeabilities of a size panel of solutes measured across different cell layers. Using this approach, we demonstrated that depletion of ZO‐1 protein in MDCK Type II renal epithelial cells decreased Leak Pathway opening size and increased opening density. Depletion of ZO‐2 protein either had no effect or minimally decreased opening size and did not markedly change opening density. Comparison of MDCK Type II cells with MDCK Type I cells revealed that Type I cells exhibited a substantially smaller Leak Pathway permeability than did Type II cells. This lower permeability was due to a decrease in opening density with little or no change in opening size. These results demonstrate the utility of this approach to provide insights into the basis for observed differences in epithelial Leak Pathway permeability. This approach has wide applications including analysis of the molecular basis for Leak Pathway permeability, the effects of specific manipulations on Leak Pathway permeability properties, and the effects of permeation enhancers on Leak Pathway permeability properties.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T22:50:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-614b4290a5724853993fa9f43b8a5dec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2051-817X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T22:50:06Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Physiological Reports
spelling doaj.art-614b4290a5724853993fa9f43b8a5dec2022-12-21T23:28:38ZengWileyPhysiological Reports2051-817X2022-03-01105n/an/a10.14814/phy2.15202Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeabilityAshley Monaco0Josephine Axis1Kurt Amsler2Department of Biomedical Sciences NYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine Old Westbury New York USADepartment of Biomedical Sciences NYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine Old Westbury New York USADepartment of Biomedical Sciences NYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine Old Westbury New York USAAbstract Although many studies have reported differences in epithelial paracellular Leak Pathway permeability following genetic manipulations and treatment with various agents, the basis for these differences remains mostly unclear. Two primary mechanisms which could underlie differences in Leak Pathway permeability are differences in the density of Leak Pathway openings and differences in the opening size. Using a computational approach, we demonstrate that these two possibilities can be readily distinguished graphically by comparing the apparent paracellular permeabilities of a size panel of solutes measured across different cell layers. Using this approach, we demonstrated that depletion of ZO‐1 protein in MDCK Type II renal epithelial cells decreased Leak Pathway opening size and increased opening density. Depletion of ZO‐2 protein either had no effect or minimally decreased opening size and did not markedly change opening density. Comparison of MDCK Type II cells with MDCK Type I cells revealed that Type I cells exhibited a substantially smaller Leak Pathway permeability than did Type II cells. This lower permeability was due to a decrease in opening density with little or no change in opening size. These results demonstrate the utility of this approach to provide insights into the basis for observed differences in epithelial Leak Pathway permeability. This approach has wide applications including analysis of the molecular basis for Leak Pathway permeability, the effects of specific manipulations on Leak Pathway permeability properties, and the effects of permeation enhancers on Leak Pathway permeability properties.https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15202macromoleculepermeabilitytight junction
spellingShingle Ashley Monaco
Josephine Axis
Kurt Amsler
Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability
Physiological Reports
macromolecule
permeability
tight junction
title Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability
title_full Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability
title_fullStr Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability
title_full_unstemmed Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability
title_short Simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability
title_sort simple graphical approach to investigate differences in transepithelial paracellular leak pathway permeability
topic macromolecule
permeability
tight junction
url https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15202
work_keys_str_mv AT ashleymonaco simplegraphicalapproachtoinvestigatedifferencesintransepithelialparacellularleakpathwaypermeability
AT josephineaxis simplegraphicalapproachtoinvestigatedifferencesintransepithelialparacellularleakpathwaypermeability
AT kurtamsler simplegraphicalapproachtoinvestigatedifferencesintransepithelialparacellularleakpathwaypermeability