Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam

<i>Introduction</i>: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABD) represent a heterogeneous group of blistering disorders that may be debilitating with high morbidity. Clinical, histological, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies are essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis of ABD, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giang Huong Tran, Nhan Thi Ai Le, Minh Hoang Dang, Thao Thi Phuong Doan, Thuy L. Phung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Dermatopathology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2296-3529/10/1/4
_version_ 1797612406610853888
author Giang Huong Tran
Nhan Thi Ai Le
Minh Hoang Dang
Thao Thi Phuong Doan
Thuy L. Phung
author_facet Giang Huong Tran
Nhan Thi Ai Le
Minh Hoang Dang
Thao Thi Phuong Doan
Thuy L. Phung
author_sort Giang Huong Tran
collection DOAJ
description <i>Introduction</i>: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABD) represent a heterogeneous group of blistering disorders that may be debilitating with high morbidity. Clinical, histological, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies are essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis of ABD, which is essential for its clinical management. Our study objective was to perform a systematic evaluation of ABD cases in a patient population at an academic medical center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and determine the degree of concordance of clinical, histological, and DIF findings in ABD. <i>Methodology</i>: A systematic retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on 92 patients diagnosed with ABD by clinical, histological, and DIF studies at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, between September 2019 and September 2021. The clinical histories, H and E stained tissue sections, and DIF stains were evaluated by pathologists at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy. <i>Results</i>: ABD was evaluated as a whole and subdivided into an intraepidermal blister subgroup and a subepidermal blister subgroup. The analysis of paired diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) for concordance with the final diagnosis was performed and showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the paired methods (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). There was moderate concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses among all ABD cases (Brennan-Prediger coefficient Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.522, CI = 0.95). In the intraepidermal blister subgroup, the diagnostic accuracies of the histology and DIF stains were comparable to each other, and both were more accurate than a clinical diagnosis alone. In the subepidermal blister subgroup, there was no statistically significant difference in each pair of the three diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). The concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was high for the intraepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.758, CI = 0.95). However, the concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was slight for the subepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.171, CI = 0.95). <i>Conclusion</i>: Histological evaluation is highly accurate in the diagnosis of the intraepidermal blister subgroup, but it is not as accurate in the diagnosis of the subepidermal blister subgroup in the Vietnamese patient cohort in which clinical, histological, and DIF studies were performed. DIF stains are a crucial diagnostic tool for ABD in this patient population.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:41:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-614ec5d75072419bbe2440381b23756b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-3529
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:41:46Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Dermatopathology
spelling doaj.art-614ec5d75072419bbe2440381b23756b2023-11-17T10:32:39ZengMDPI AGDermatopathology2296-35292023-01-01101304010.3390/dermatopathology10010004Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in VietnamGiang Huong Tran0Nhan Thi Ai Le1Minh Hoang Dang2Thao Thi Phuong Doan3Thuy L. Phung4Department of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36617, USA<i>Introduction</i>: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABD) represent a heterogeneous group of blistering disorders that may be debilitating with high morbidity. Clinical, histological, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies are essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis of ABD, which is essential for its clinical management. Our study objective was to perform a systematic evaluation of ABD cases in a patient population at an academic medical center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and determine the degree of concordance of clinical, histological, and DIF findings in ABD. <i>Methodology</i>: A systematic retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on 92 patients diagnosed with ABD by clinical, histological, and DIF studies at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, between September 2019 and September 2021. The clinical histories, H and E stained tissue sections, and DIF stains were evaluated by pathologists at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy. <i>Results</i>: ABD was evaluated as a whole and subdivided into an intraepidermal blister subgroup and a subepidermal blister subgroup. The analysis of paired diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) for concordance with the final diagnosis was performed and showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the paired methods (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). There was moderate concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses among all ABD cases (Brennan-Prediger coefficient Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.522, CI = 0.95). In the intraepidermal blister subgroup, the diagnostic accuracies of the histology and DIF stains were comparable to each other, and both were more accurate than a clinical diagnosis alone. In the subepidermal blister subgroup, there was no statistically significant difference in each pair of the three diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). The concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was high for the intraepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.758, CI = 0.95). However, the concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was slight for the subepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.171, CI = 0.95). <i>Conclusion</i>: Histological evaluation is highly accurate in the diagnosis of the intraepidermal blister subgroup, but it is not as accurate in the diagnosis of the subepidermal blister subgroup in the Vietnamese patient cohort in which clinical, histological, and DIF studies were performed. DIF stains are a crucial diagnostic tool for ABD in this patient population.https://www.mdpi.com/2296-3529/10/1/4autoimmune bullous dermatosesdirect immunofluorescence stainssubepidermal bullous disordersintraepidermal bullous disorders
spellingShingle Giang Huong Tran
Nhan Thi Ai Le
Minh Hoang Dang
Thao Thi Phuong Doan
Thuy L. Phung
Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam
Dermatopathology
autoimmune bullous dermatoses
direct immunofluorescence stains
subepidermal bullous disorders
intraepidermal bullous disorders
title Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam
title_full Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam
title_fullStr Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam
title_short Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam
title_sort concordance of clinical histologic and direct immunofluorescence findings in patients with autoimmune bullous dermatoses in vietnam
topic autoimmune bullous dermatoses
direct immunofluorescence stains
subepidermal bullous disorders
intraepidermal bullous disorders
url https://www.mdpi.com/2296-3529/10/1/4
work_keys_str_mv AT gianghuongtran concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam
AT nhanthiaile concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam
AT minhhoangdang concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam
AT thaothiphuongdoan concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam
AT thuylphung concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam