Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam
<i>Introduction</i>: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABD) represent a heterogeneous group of blistering disorders that may be debilitating with high morbidity. Clinical, histological, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies are essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis of ABD, w...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Dermatopathology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2296-3529/10/1/4 |
_version_ | 1797612406610853888 |
---|---|
author | Giang Huong Tran Nhan Thi Ai Le Minh Hoang Dang Thao Thi Phuong Doan Thuy L. Phung |
author_facet | Giang Huong Tran Nhan Thi Ai Le Minh Hoang Dang Thao Thi Phuong Doan Thuy L. Phung |
author_sort | Giang Huong Tran |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <i>Introduction</i>: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABD) represent a heterogeneous group of blistering disorders that may be debilitating with high morbidity. Clinical, histological, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies are essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis of ABD, which is essential for its clinical management. Our study objective was to perform a systematic evaluation of ABD cases in a patient population at an academic medical center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and determine the degree of concordance of clinical, histological, and DIF findings in ABD. <i>Methodology</i>: A systematic retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on 92 patients diagnosed with ABD by clinical, histological, and DIF studies at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, between September 2019 and September 2021. The clinical histories, H and E stained tissue sections, and DIF stains were evaluated by pathologists at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy. <i>Results</i>: ABD was evaluated as a whole and subdivided into an intraepidermal blister subgroup and a subepidermal blister subgroup. The analysis of paired diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) for concordance with the final diagnosis was performed and showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the paired methods (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). There was moderate concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses among all ABD cases (Brennan-Prediger coefficient Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.522, CI = 0.95). In the intraepidermal blister subgroup, the diagnostic accuracies of the histology and DIF stains were comparable to each other, and both were more accurate than a clinical diagnosis alone. In the subepidermal blister subgroup, there was no statistically significant difference in each pair of the three diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). The concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was high for the intraepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.758, CI = 0.95). However, the concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was slight for the subepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.171, CI = 0.95). <i>Conclusion</i>: Histological evaluation is highly accurate in the diagnosis of the intraepidermal blister subgroup, but it is not as accurate in the diagnosis of the subepidermal blister subgroup in the Vietnamese patient cohort in which clinical, histological, and DIF studies were performed. DIF stains are a crucial diagnostic tool for ABD in this patient population. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:41:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-614ec5d75072419bbe2440381b23756b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2296-3529 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:41:46Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Dermatopathology |
spelling | doaj.art-614ec5d75072419bbe2440381b23756b2023-11-17T10:32:39ZengMDPI AGDermatopathology2296-35292023-01-01101304010.3390/dermatopathology10010004Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in VietnamGiang Huong Tran0Nhan Thi Ai Le1Minh Hoang Dang2Thao Thi Phuong Doan3Thuy L. Phung4Department of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, VietnamDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36617, USA<i>Introduction</i>: Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (ABD) represent a heterogeneous group of blistering disorders that may be debilitating with high morbidity. Clinical, histological, and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) studies are essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis of ABD, which is essential for its clinical management. Our study objective was to perform a systematic evaluation of ABD cases in a patient population at an academic medical center in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and determine the degree of concordance of clinical, histological, and DIF findings in ABD. <i>Methodology</i>: A systematic retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on 92 patients diagnosed with ABD by clinical, histological, and DIF studies at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, between September 2019 and September 2021. The clinical histories, H and E stained tissue sections, and DIF stains were evaluated by pathologists at the University of Medicine and Pharmacy. <i>Results</i>: ABD was evaluated as a whole and subdivided into an intraepidermal blister subgroup and a subepidermal blister subgroup. The analysis of paired diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) for concordance with the final diagnosis was performed and showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the paired methods (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). There was moderate concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses among all ABD cases (Brennan-Prediger coefficient Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.522, CI = 0.95). In the intraepidermal blister subgroup, the diagnostic accuracies of the histology and DIF stains were comparable to each other, and both were more accurate than a clinical diagnosis alone. In the subepidermal blister subgroup, there was no statistically significant difference in each pair of the three diagnostic methods (clinical, histological, and DIF) (McNemar’s test, <i>p</i> > 0.05). The concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was high for the intraepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.758, CI = 0.95). However, the concordance between the clinical, histological, and DIF diagnoses was slight for the subepidermal blister subgroup (Kappa test, κ<sub>BP</sub> = 0.171, CI = 0.95). <i>Conclusion</i>: Histological evaluation is highly accurate in the diagnosis of the intraepidermal blister subgroup, but it is not as accurate in the diagnosis of the subepidermal blister subgroup in the Vietnamese patient cohort in which clinical, histological, and DIF studies were performed. DIF stains are a crucial diagnostic tool for ABD in this patient population.https://www.mdpi.com/2296-3529/10/1/4autoimmune bullous dermatosesdirect immunofluorescence stainssubepidermal bullous disordersintraepidermal bullous disorders |
spellingShingle | Giang Huong Tran Nhan Thi Ai Le Minh Hoang Dang Thao Thi Phuong Doan Thuy L. Phung Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam Dermatopathology autoimmune bullous dermatoses direct immunofluorescence stains subepidermal bullous disorders intraepidermal bullous disorders |
title | Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam |
title_full | Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam |
title_fullStr | Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam |
title_full_unstemmed | Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam |
title_short | Concordance of Clinical, Histologic and Direct Immunofluorescence Findings in Patients with Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses in Vietnam |
title_sort | concordance of clinical histologic and direct immunofluorescence findings in patients with autoimmune bullous dermatoses in vietnam |
topic | autoimmune bullous dermatoses direct immunofluorescence stains subepidermal bullous disorders intraepidermal bullous disorders |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2296-3529/10/1/4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gianghuongtran concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam AT nhanthiaile concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam AT minhhoangdang concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam AT thaothiphuongdoan concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam AT thuylphung concordanceofclinicalhistologicanddirectimmunofluorescencefindingsinpatientswithautoimmunebullousdermatosesinvietnam |