Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling Location
This study evaluates concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, and usability of the Strava smartphone app for measuring bicycling locations in urban and rural field tests. Strava location data were inside an 11-meter buffer on average 64% of the time compared to Qstarz' 52%, over 100 evalua...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Findings Press
2022-12-01
|
| Series: | Findings |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.57773 |
| _version_ | 1797341615631630336 |
|---|---|
| author | Anna Porter Kelly Evenson Greg Griffin |
| author_facet | Anna Porter Kelly Evenson Greg Griffin |
| author_sort | Anna Porter |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study evaluates concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, and usability of the Strava smartphone app for measuring bicycling locations in urban and rural field tests. Strava location data were inside an 11-meter buffer on average 64% of the time compared to Qstarz' 52%, over 100 evaluations (n participants=73). Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that the Strava app was useful (83%) and that they would prefer to use a smartphone app to track their bicycling (42%). Results indicate that the Strava app is reliable and valid for measuring bicycling locations in these field tests. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:20:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-61679055815b4f7e9737c14998f1d7da |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2652-8800 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T10:20:35Z |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | Findings Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Findings |
| spelling | doaj.art-61679055815b4f7e9737c14998f1d7da2024-01-27T23:23:56ZengFindings PressFindings2652-88002022-12-01Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling LocationAnna PorterKelly EvensonGreg GriffinThis study evaluates concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, and usability of the Strava smartphone app for measuring bicycling locations in urban and rural field tests. Strava location data were inside an 11-meter buffer on average 64% of the time compared to Qstarz' 52%, over 100 evaluations (n participants=73). Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that the Strava app was useful (83%) and that they would prefer to use a smartphone app to track their bicycling (42%). Results indicate that the Strava app is reliable and valid for measuring bicycling locations in these field tests.https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.57773 |
| spellingShingle | Anna Porter Kelly Evenson Greg Griffin Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling Location Findings |
| title | Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling Location |
| title_full | Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling Location |
| title_fullStr | Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling Location |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling Location |
| title_short | Validity, Reliability, and Usability of a Smartphone App to Measure Bicycling Location |
| title_sort | validity reliability and usability of a smartphone app to measure bicycling location |
| url | https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.57773 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annaporter validityreliabilityandusabilityofasmartphoneapptomeasurebicyclinglocation AT kellyevenson validityreliabilityandusabilityofasmartphoneapptomeasurebicyclinglocation AT greggriffin validityreliabilityandusabilityofasmartphoneapptomeasurebicyclinglocation |