Recalled emotions and risk judgments

The current study is based on a field study of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war that was conducted in two waves, the first two weeks after the end of the war, and the second 18 months later (2008). The purpose of the study was to examine recalled emotions and perceived risks induced by manipulation using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shosh Shahrabani, Uri Benzion, Tal Shavit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2009-08-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/9426/jdm9426.pdf
_version_ 1797764927248662528
author Shosh Shahrabani
Uri Benzion
Tal Shavit
author_facet Shosh Shahrabani
Uri Benzion
Tal Shavit
author_sort Shosh Shahrabani
collection DOAJ
description The current study is based on a field study of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war that was conducted in two waves, the first two weeks after the end of the war, and the second 18 months later (2008). The purpose of the study was to examine recalled emotions and perceived risks induced by manipulation using a short videoclip that recalled the sounds of the alarms and the sights of the missile attacks during the war. Before filling in the study questionnaire in 2008, the experimental group watched a short videoclip recalling the events of the war. The control group did not watch the video before filling in the questionnaire. Using the data provided by questionnaires, we analyzed the effect of recalled emotions on perceived risks in two different regions in Israel: the northern region, which was under missile attack daily during the war, and the central region, which was not under missile attacks. The videoclip had a strong effect on the level of recalled emotions in both regions, but it did not affect risk judgments. The results of the analytical framework in the northern region support both the valence approach, in which negative emotion increases pessimism about risk (Johnson and Tversky, 1983), and the modified appraisal tendency theory, which implies different effects for different emotions (Lerner and Keltner, 2000). The current study emphasizes the effects of recalled emotion in the context of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war on perceived risks among those in the northern region who were under direct attack compared to those who were not directly exposed to the war. Understanding people's responses to stressful events is crucial, not only when these events take place but also over time, since media-induced emotions can influence appraisals and decisions regarding public policies.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:03:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6178980e067b4ffbbfac1f69c510ca87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:03:44Z
publishDate 2009-08-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-6178980e067b4ffbbfac1f69c510ca872023-08-02T02:15:32ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752009-08-0145355362Recalled emotions and risk judgmentsShosh ShahrabaniUri BenzionTal ShavitThe current study is based on a field study of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war that was conducted in two waves, the first two weeks after the end of the war, and the second 18 months later (2008). The purpose of the study was to examine recalled emotions and perceived risks induced by manipulation using a short videoclip that recalled the sounds of the alarms and the sights of the missile attacks during the war. Before filling in the study questionnaire in 2008, the experimental group watched a short videoclip recalling the events of the war. The control group did not watch the video before filling in the questionnaire. Using the data provided by questionnaires, we analyzed the effect of recalled emotions on perceived risks in two different regions in Israel: the northern region, which was under missile attack daily during the war, and the central region, which was not under missile attacks. The videoclip had a strong effect on the level of recalled emotions in both regions, but it did not affect risk judgments. The results of the analytical framework in the northern region support both the valence approach, in which negative emotion increases pessimism about risk (Johnson and Tversky, 1983), and the modified appraisal tendency theory, which implies different effects for different emotions (Lerner and Keltner, 2000). The current study emphasizes the effects of recalled emotion in the context of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon war on perceived risks among those in the northern region who were under direct attack compared to those who were not directly exposed to the war. Understanding people's responses to stressful events is crucial, not only when these events take place but also over time, since media-induced emotions can influence appraisals and decisions regarding public policies.http://journal.sjdm.org/9426/jdm9426.pdfrisk perceptionemotionsterrorismIsrael.NAKeywords
spellingShingle Shosh Shahrabani
Uri Benzion
Tal Shavit
Recalled emotions and risk judgments
Judgment and Decision Making
risk perception
emotions
terrorism
Israel.NAKeywords
title Recalled emotions and risk judgments
title_full Recalled emotions and risk judgments
title_fullStr Recalled emotions and risk judgments
title_full_unstemmed Recalled emotions and risk judgments
title_short Recalled emotions and risk judgments
title_sort recalled emotions and risk judgments
topic risk perception
emotions
terrorism
Israel.NAKeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/9426/jdm9426.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shoshshahrabani recalledemotionsandriskjudgments
AT uribenzion recalledemotionsandriskjudgments
AT talshavit recalledemotionsandriskjudgments