Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations
Estimates of terrestrial water storage (TWS) variations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission are used to assess the accuracy of four global numerical model realizations that simulate the continental branch of the global water cycle. Based on four different valid...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2017-02-01
|
| Series: | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| Online Access: | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/821/2017/hess-21-821-2017.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819127606402875392 |
|---|---|
| author | L. Zhang H. Dobslaw T. Stacke A. Güntner R. Dill M. Thomas |
| author_facet | L. Zhang H. Dobslaw T. Stacke A. Güntner R. Dill M. Thomas |
| author_sort | L. Zhang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Estimates of terrestrial water storage (TWS) variations from the
Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)
satellite mission are used to assess the accuracy of four global
numerical model realizations that simulate the continental branch of the
global water cycle. Based on four different validation metrics, we
demonstrate that for the 31 largest discharge basins worldwide all model runs
agree with the observations to a very limited degree only, together with
large spreads among the models themselves. Since we apply a common
atmospheric forcing data set to all hydrological models considered, we
conclude that those discrepancies are not entirely related to uncertainties
in meteorologic input, but instead to the model structure and
parametrization, and in particular to the representation of individual
storage components with different spatial characteristics in each of the
models. TWS as monitored by the GRACE mission is therefore a valuable
validation data set for global numerical simulations of the terrestrial water
storage since it is sensitive to very different model physics in individual
basins, which offers helpful insight to modellers for the future improvement
of large-scale numerical models of the global terrestrial water cycle. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T08:14:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-61795e0a9a544f89befef15ee4f27f49 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T08:14:36Z |
| publishDate | 2017-02-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-61795e0a9a544f89befef15ee4f27f492022-12-21T18:32:56ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382017-02-0121282183710.5194/hess-21-821-2017Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observationsL. Zhang0H. Dobslaw1T. Stacke2A. Güntner3R. Dill4M. Thomas5Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyHelmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, GermanyHelmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyHelmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyHelmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyEstimates of terrestrial water storage (TWS) variations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission are used to assess the accuracy of four global numerical model realizations that simulate the continental branch of the global water cycle. Based on four different validation metrics, we demonstrate that for the 31 largest discharge basins worldwide all model runs agree with the observations to a very limited degree only, together with large spreads among the models themselves. Since we apply a common atmospheric forcing data set to all hydrological models considered, we conclude that those discrepancies are not entirely related to uncertainties in meteorologic input, but instead to the model structure and parametrization, and in particular to the representation of individual storage components with different spatial characteristics in each of the models. TWS as monitored by the GRACE mission is therefore a valuable validation data set for global numerical simulations of the terrestrial water storage since it is sensitive to very different model physics in individual basins, which offers helpful insight to modellers for the future improvement of large-scale numerical models of the global terrestrial water cycle.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/821/2017/hess-21-821-2017.pdf |
| spellingShingle | L. Zhang H. Dobslaw T. Stacke A. Güntner R. Dill M. Thomas Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations Hydrology and Earth System Sciences |
| title | Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations |
| title_full | Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations |
| title_fullStr | Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations |
| title_short | Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations |
| title_sort | validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with grace satellite observations |
| url | http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/821/2017/hess-21-821-2017.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lzhang validationofterrestrialwaterstoragevariationsassimulatedbydifferentglobalnumericalmodelswithgracesatelliteobservations AT hdobslaw validationofterrestrialwaterstoragevariationsassimulatedbydifferentglobalnumericalmodelswithgracesatelliteobservations AT tstacke validationofterrestrialwaterstoragevariationsassimulatedbydifferentglobalnumericalmodelswithgracesatelliteobservations AT aguntner validationofterrestrialwaterstoragevariationsassimulatedbydifferentglobalnumericalmodelswithgracesatelliteobservations AT rdill validationofterrestrialwaterstoragevariationsassimulatedbydifferentglobalnumericalmodelswithgracesatelliteobservations AT mthomas validationofterrestrialwaterstoragevariationsassimulatedbydifferentglobalnumericalmodelswithgracesatelliteobservations |