Responsibility Without Freedom? Folk Judgements About Deliberate Actions
A long-standing position in philosophy, law, and theology is that a person can be held morally responsible for an action only if they had the freedom to choose and to act otherwise. Thus, many philosophers consider freedom to be a necessary condition for moral responsibility. However, empirical find...
Main Authors: | Tillmann Vierkant, Robert Deutschländer, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, John-Dylan Haynes |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01133/full |
Similar Items
-
With Habermas against Habermas. Deliberation without Consensus
by: Katarzyna Jezierska
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Cultivating Deliberation for Democracy
by: Tim van Gelder
Published: (2012-04-01) -
Just Talk: Public Deliberation After 9/11
by: Francesca Polletta
Published: (2007-12-01) -
Unconscious intuition or conscious analysis? Critical questions for the Deliberation-Without-Attention paradigm
by: Balazs Aczel, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Democratic Deliberation and Moral Awareness
by: Daniel C. Fouke
Published: (2009-10-01)