Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever

This study aimed to compare strain around implants used as abutments for removable partial dentures with wrought wires and fixed partial dentures with ball attachments and fixed dentures with posterior cantilever. An edentulous mandibular model was constructed using epoxy resin with four parallel im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roodabeh Koodaryan, Neda Yasamineh, Ali Hafezeqoran, Sheida Monem Moharrer, Seyed Gholamreza Noorazar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2022;volume=13;issue=2;spage=100;epage=105;aulast=Koodaryan
_version_ 1818007006002282496
author Roodabeh Koodaryan
Neda Yasamineh
Ali Hafezeqoran
Sheida Monem Moharrer
Seyed Gholamreza Noorazar
author_facet Roodabeh Koodaryan
Neda Yasamineh
Ali Hafezeqoran
Sheida Monem Moharrer
Seyed Gholamreza Noorazar
author_sort Roodabeh Koodaryan
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to compare strain around implants used as abutments for removable partial dentures with wrought wires and fixed partial dentures with ball attachments and fixed dentures with posterior cantilever. An edentulous mandibular model was constructed using epoxy resin with four parallel implants in the area between the two mental foramina. Four strain gauges were attached to the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. One fixed prosthesis with cantilever and two removable partial dentures were considered as prosthetic treatments. A vertical 500-N force was applied with 10-N intervals. The maximum strain in the fixed prosthesis was higher than that of the partial removable denture; in the removable denture with a wrought wire arm, it was higher than that in the denture with a ball attachment (P < 0.001). The lowest rate of strain was recorded on the mesial aspect (P < 0.05). However, the highest rate of strain was recorded on the lingual and distal aspects of the removable denture with a wrought wire in the buccal aspect and the removable prosthesis with the ball attachment on the buccal and lingual aspects (P < 0.05). Finally, despite minor differences in the maximum strain rate in each implant position, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Partial removable denture with a ball attachment decreased strain more than that by the removable portal denture with a wrought wire arm. The worst type of prosthesis in terms of the overall strain rate was the fixed prosthesis with cantilever.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T05:09:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6180030fc81342f0abd8a445974f6754
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2231-4040
0976-2094
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T05:09:44Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
spelling doaj.art-6180030fc81342f0abd8a445974f67542022-12-22T02:10:36ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research2231-40400976-20942022-01-0113210010510.4103/japtr.japtr_160_21Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantileverRoodabeh KoodaryanNeda YasaminehAli HafezeqoranSheida Monem MoharrerSeyed Gholamreza NoorazarThis study aimed to compare strain around implants used as abutments for removable partial dentures with wrought wires and fixed partial dentures with ball attachments and fixed dentures with posterior cantilever. An edentulous mandibular model was constructed using epoxy resin with four parallel implants in the area between the two mental foramina. Four strain gauges were attached to the buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects of each implant. One fixed prosthesis with cantilever and two removable partial dentures were considered as prosthetic treatments. A vertical 500-N force was applied with 10-N intervals. The maximum strain in the fixed prosthesis was higher than that of the partial removable denture; in the removable denture with a wrought wire arm, it was higher than that in the denture with a ball attachment (P < 0.001). The lowest rate of strain was recorded on the mesial aspect (P < 0.05). However, the highest rate of strain was recorded on the lingual and distal aspects of the removable denture with a wrought wire in the buccal aspect and the removable prosthesis with the ball attachment on the buccal and lingual aspects (P < 0.05). Finally, despite minor differences in the maximum strain rate in each implant position, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Partial removable denture with a ball attachment decreased strain more than that by the removable portal denture with a wrought wire arm. The worst type of prosthesis in terms of the overall strain rate was the fixed prosthesis with cantilever.http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2022;volume=13;issue=2;spage=100;epage=105;aulast=Koodaryanfixed prosthesisremovable prosthesisstrain gauge
spellingShingle Roodabeh Koodaryan
Neda Yasamineh
Ali Hafezeqoran
Sheida Monem Moharrer
Seyed Gholamreza Noorazar
Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research
fixed prosthesis
removable prosthesis
strain gauge
title Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
title_full Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
title_fullStr Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
title_full_unstemmed Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
title_short Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
title_sort determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
topic fixed prosthesis
removable prosthesis
strain gauge
url http://www.japtr.org/article.asp?issn=2231-4040;year=2022;volume=13;issue=2;spage=100;epage=105;aulast=Koodaryan
work_keys_str_mv AT roodabehkoodaryan determinationofstrainarounddistalimplantsasabutmentsforpartialandfixedimplantsupportedprostheseswithposteriorcantilever
AT nedayasamineh determinationofstrainarounddistalimplantsasabutmentsforpartialandfixedimplantsupportedprostheseswithposteriorcantilever
AT alihafezeqoran determinationofstrainarounddistalimplantsasabutmentsforpartialandfixedimplantsupportedprostheseswithposteriorcantilever
AT sheidamonemmoharrer determinationofstrainarounddistalimplantsasabutmentsforpartialandfixedimplantsupportedprostheseswithposteriorcantilever
AT seyedgholamrezanoorazar determinationofstrainarounddistalimplantsasabutmentsforpartialandfixedimplantsupportedprostheseswithposteriorcantilever