AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University

Education is an essential component for nations preparing to take advantage of the opportunities and confront the challenges of the 21st century. Universities, colleges, and research centers must work effectively and efficiently to achieve maximum results. In order to provide a comparable and verifi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omer A. Bafail, Reda M. S. Abdulaal, Mohammad R. Kabli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/10/4/107
_version_ 1797431690861215744
author Omer A. Bafail
Reda M. S. Abdulaal
Mohammad R. Kabli
author_facet Omer A. Bafail
Reda M. S. Abdulaal
Mohammad R. Kabli
author_sort Omer A. Bafail
collection DOAJ
description Education is an essential component for nations preparing to take advantage of the opportunities and confront the challenges of the 21st century. Universities, colleges, and research centers must work effectively and efficiently to achieve maximum results. In order to provide a comparable and verifiable evaluation of such institutions’ efforts, administrators need to adopt measurement tools such as those offered by multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). The use of MCDM to solve complex real-world problems in the educational sector has dramatically increased in the past decade. This paper ranked the Engineering departments in a public university from 2019 to 2021 using combined MCDM methods between Analytical Hierarchy Analysis (AHP) and Ranking Alternatives by Perimeter Similarity (RAPS). The AHP technique assisted in the weighting for each evaluation criterion covered in this study. The RAPS technique assisted in ranking the Engineering departments using weights derived from the AHP technique. For the first time, the use of RAPS in the educational sector is presented in this paper. The findings revealed some of the departments under investigation’s vulnerabilities, indicating that they require assistance from the institution’s administration. Moreover, the results demonstrate that combining the AHP and RAPS techniques to evaluate and rank university departments is a successful method.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:47:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61a6056a958a4f6ab1e188ea58f5909f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-8954
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:47:48Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Systems
spelling doaj.art-61a6056a958a4f6ab1e188ea58f5909f2023-12-02T00:22:35ZengMDPI AGSystems2079-89542022-07-0110410710.3390/systems10040107AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public UniversityOmer A. Bafail0Reda M. S. Abdulaal1Mohammad R. Kabli2Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi ArabiaEducation is an essential component for nations preparing to take advantage of the opportunities and confront the challenges of the 21st century. Universities, colleges, and research centers must work effectively and efficiently to achieve maximum results. In order to provide a comparable and verifiable evaluation of such institutions’ efforts, administrators need to adopt measurement tools such as those offered by multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). The use of MCDM to solve complex real-world problems in the educational sector has dramatically increased in the past decade. This paper ranked the Engineering departments in a public university from 2019 to 2021 using combined MCDM methods between Analytical Hierarchy Analysis (AHP) and Ranking Alternatives by Perimeter Similarity (RAPS). The AHP technique assisted in the weighting for each evaluation criterion covered in this study. The RAPS technique assisted in ranking the Engineering departments using weights derived from the AHP technique. For the first time, the use of RAPS in the educational sector is presented in this paper. The findings revealed some of the departments under investigation’s vulnerabilities, indicating that they require assistance from the institution’s administration. Moreover, the results demonstrate that combining the AHP and RAPS techniques to evaluate and rank university departments is a successful method.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/10/4/107multi-criteria decision makinganalytical hierarchy analysisranking alternatives by perimeter similarityranking methods
spellingShingle Omer A. Bafail
Reda M. S. Abdulaal
Mohammad R. Kabli
AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University
Systems
multi-criteria decision making
analytical hierarchy analysis
ranking alternatives by perimeter similarity
ranking methods
title AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University
title_full AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University
title_fullStr AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University
title_full_unstemmed AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University
title_short AHP-RAPS Approach for Evaluating the Productivity of Engineering Departments at a Public University
title_sort ahp raps approach for evaluating the productivity of engineering departments at a public university
topic multi-criteria decision making
analytical hierarchy analysis
ranking alternatives by perimeter similarity
ranking methods
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/10/4/107
work_keys_str_mv AT omerabafail ahprapsapproachforevaluatingtheproductivityofengineeringdepartmentsatapublicuniversity
AT redamsabdulaal ahprapsapproachforevaluatingtheproductivityofengineeringdepartmentsatapublicuniversity
AT mohammadrkabli ahprapsapproachforevaluatingtheproductivityofengineeringdepartmentsatapublicuniversity