A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties

Background: Creating a supportive environment for scientific research is vital to improve the quality of research and its impact on development of society. This study outlines the development of a new scale that can measure the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Ali Yousef, Mayssoon Dashash
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022039895
_version_ 1811173411460743168
author Mohammad Ali Yousef
Mayssoon Dashash
author_facet Mohammad Ali Yousef
Mayssoon Dashash
author_sort Mohammad Ali Yousef
collection DOAJ
description Background: Creating a supportive environment for scientific research is vital to improve the quality of research and its impact on development of society. This study outlines the development of a new scale that can measure the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This tool aimed to allow medical institutions to measure their scientific research environment from the researchers' point of view. This may ensure an appropriate scientific research environment for researchers by identifying and overcoming obstacles. Methods: Based on literature, an initial list with 58 items was formulated. After discussing with postgraduate students and academic staff members from Damascus University and the Syrian Virtual University, A 38-item scale remained from the initial list of 58 items. To test the scale, postgraduate medical students (n = 30) were asked to fill the scale and answer 38 questions-with a 5-point Likert scale-twice in two separate occasions. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was performed to study the internal correlation. The internal consistency test was performed with Cronbach's Alpha, and the Test-Retest Reliability was conducted to study the reliability of the scale. Moreover, factor analysis was used to determine the sampling adequacy. Results: Thirty postgraduate medical students at Damascus University completed the 38-item scale. Scale scores in the sample displayed good reliability in relation to published results. Findings, showed an internal correlation among its sub-scales. The results showed an acceptable reliability values such as internal consistency (α = 0.863) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.093). KMO had a value bigger than 0.7 (KMO = 0.849) which indicate sampling adequacy, also, Bartlett's test of the sphericity was (1142.76, Df = 91, P-value = 0.000) which prove meaningful of the factor analysis. The results of varimax rotation found that five main factors were retained. Conclusions: The Scientific Research Environment Measure (SREM), can be suggested as an effective evaluation instrument which can be applied easily to assess the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This would help the decision makers to support teaching, learning, and research environment through implementing new strategies that inspire postgraduate medical students and increase their engagement.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:46:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61bbb79179aa4e6bad1c67d0716fc7f1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:46:23Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-61bbb79179aa4e6bad1c67d0716fc7f12023-02-03T04:58:39ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-01-0191e12701A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical facultiesMohammad Ali Yousef0Mayssoon Dashash1Medical Education Program, Syrian Virtual University, Damascus, Syria; Damascus University, Damascus, Syria; Corresponding author. Medical Education Program, Syrian Virtual University, Damascus, Syria.Medical Education Program, Syrian Virtual University, Damascus, Syria; Damascus University, Damascus, SyriaBackground: Creating a supportive environment for scientific research is vital to improve the quality of research and its impact on development of society. This study outlines the development of a new scale that can measure the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This tool aimed to allow medical institutions to measure their scientific research environment from the researchers' point of view. This may ensure an appropriate scientific research environment for researchers by identifying and overcoming obstacles. Methods: Based on literature, an initial list with 58 items was formulated. After discussing with postgraduate students and academic staff members from Damascus University and the Syrian Virtual University, A 38-item scale remained from the initial list of 58 items. To test the scale, postgraduate medical students (n = 30) were asked to fill the scale and answer 38 questions-with a 5-point Likert scale-twice in two separate occasions. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was performed to study the internal correlation. The internal consistency test was performed with Cronbach's Alpha, and the Test-Retest Reliability was conducted to study the reliability of the scale. Moreover, factor analysis was used to determine the sampling adequacy. Results: Thirty postgraduate medical students at Damascus University completed the 38-item scale. Scale scores in the sample displayed good reliability in relation to published results. Findings, showed an internal correlation among its sub-scales. The results showed an acceptable reliability values such as internal consistency (α = 0.863) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.093). KMO had a value bigger than 0.7 (KMO = 0.849) which indicate sampling adequacy, also, Bartlett's test of the sphericity was (1142.76, Df = 91, P-value = 0.000) which prove meaningful of the factor analysis. The results of varimax rotation found that five main factors were retained. Conclusions: The Scientific Research Environment Measure (SREM), can be suggested as an effective evaluation instrument which can be applied easily to assess the scientific research environment of postgraduate medical students. This would help the decision makers to support teaching, learning, and research environment through implementing new strategies that inspire postgraduate medical students and increase their engagement.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022039895PostgraduateMedical environmentEducationScientific researchScale
spellingShingle Mohammad Ali Yousef
Mayssoon Dashash
A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
Heliyon
Postgraduate
Medical environment
Education
Scientific research
Scale
title A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_full A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_fullStr A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_full_unstemmed A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_short A suggested scientific research environment measure SREM in medical faculties
title_sort suggested scientific research environment measure srem in medical faculties
topic Postgraduate
Medical environment
Education
Scientific research
Scale
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844022039895
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadaliyousef asuggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties
AT mayssoondashash asuggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties
AT mohammadaliyousef suggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties
AT mayssoondashash suggestedscientificresearchenvironmentmeasuresreminmedicalfaculties