Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data

To evaluate whether the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of an iodinated contrast agent in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) from the first clinical photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner is superior to VMI CNR from a dual-source dual-energy CT scanner with energy-integrating detectors (EID), two a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ronald Booij, Niels R. van der Werf, Marcel L. Dijkshoorn, Aad van der Lugt, Marcel van Straten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/6/1467
_version_ 1797488242687213568
author Ronald Booij
Niels R. van der Werf
Marcel L. Dijkshoorn
Aad van der Lugt
Marcel van Straten
author_facet Ronald Booij
Niels R. van der Werf
Marcel L. Dijkshoorn
Aad van der Lugt
Marcel van Straten
author_sort Ronald Booij
collection DOAJ
description To evaluate whether the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of an iodinated contrast agent in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) from the first clinical photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner is superior to VMI CNR from a dual-source dual-energy CT scanner with energy-integrating detectors (EID), two anthropomorphic phantoms in three different sizes (thorax and abdomen, QRM GmbH), in combination with a custom-built insert containing cavities filled with water, and water with 15 mg iodine/mL, were scanned on an EID-based scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Force) and on a PCD-based scanner (Siemens, NAEOTOM Alpha). VMI (range 40–100 keV) were reconstructed without an iterative reconstruction (IR) technique and with an IR strength of 60% for the EID technique (ADMIRE) and closest matching IR strengths of 50% and 75% for the PCD technique (QIR). CNR was defined as the difference in mean CT numbers of water, and water with iodine, divided by the root mean square value of the measured noise in water, and water with iodine. A two-sample t-test was performed to evaluate differences in CNR between images. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For VMI without IR and below 60 keV, the CNR of the PCD-based images at 120 and 90 kVp was up to 55% and 75% higher than the CNR of the EID-based images, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For VMI above 60 keV, CNRs of PCD-based images at both 120 and 90 kVp were up to 20% lower than the CNRs of EID-based images. Similar or improved performance of PCD-based images in comparison with EID-based images were observed for VMIs reconstructed with IR techniques. In conclusion, with PCD-CT, iodine CNR on low energy VMI (<60 keV) is better than with EID-CT.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:59:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61c03bafe49f4b23abbd3ab4943cda09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:59:15Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-61c03bafe49f4b23abbd3ab4943cda092023-11-23T16:18:39ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182022-06-01126146710.3390/diagnostics12061467Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT DataRonald Booij0Niels R. van der Werf1Marcel L. Dijkshoorn2Aad van der Lugt3Marcel van Straten4Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The NetherlandsTo evaluate whether the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of an iodinated contrast agent in virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) from the first clinical photon-counting detector (PCD) CT scanner is superior to VMI CNR from a dual-source dual-energy CT scanner with energy-integrating detectors (EID), two anthropomorphic phantoms in three different sizes (thorax and abdomen, QRM GmbH), in combination with a custom-built insert containing cavities filled with water, and water with 15 mg iodine/mL, were scanned on an EID-based scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Force) and on a PCD-based scanner (Siemens, NAEOTOM Alpha). VMI (range 40–100 keV) were reconstructed without an iterative reconstruction (IR) technique and with an IR strength of 60% for the EID technique (ADMIRE) and closest matching IR strengths of 50% and 75% for the PCD technique (QIR). CNR was defined as the difference in mean CT numbers of water, and water with iodine, divided by the root mean square value of the measured noise in water, and water with iodine. A two-sample t-test was performed to evaluate differences in CNR between images. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For VMI without IR and below 60 keV, the CNR of the PCD-based images at 120 and 90 kVp was up to 55% and 75% higher than the CNR of the EID-based images, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For VMI above 60 keV, CNRs of PCD-based images at both 120 and 90 kVp were up to 20% lower than the CNRs of EID-based images. Similar or improved performance of PCD-based images in comparison with EID-based images were observed for VMIs reconstructed with IR techniques. In conclusion, with PCD-CT, iodine CNR on low energy VMI (<60 keV) is better than with EID-CT.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/6/1467X-ray computed tomographyiodinedual-energyphoton-counting CTimage quality
spellingShingle Ronald Booij
Niels R. van der Werf
Marcel L. Dijkshoorn
Aad van der Lugt
Marcel van Straten
Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data
Diagnostics
X-ray computed tomography
iodine
dual-energy
photon-counting CT
image quality
title Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data
title_full Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data
title_fullStr Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data
title_short Assessment of Iodine Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Virtual Monoenergetic Images Reconstructed from Dual-Source Energy-Integrating CT and Photon-Counting CT Data
title_sort assessment of iodine contrast to noise ratio in virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed from dual source energy integrating ct and photon counting ct data
topic X-ray computed tomography
iodine
dual-energy
photon-counting CT
image quality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/6/1467
work_keys_str_mv AT ronaldbooij assessmentofiodinecontrasttonoiseratioinvirtualmonoenergeticimagesreconstructedfromdualsourceenergyintegratingctandphotoncountingctdata
AT nielsrvanderwerf assessmentofiodinecontrasttonoiseratioinvirtualmonoenergeticimagesreconstructedfromdualsourceenergyintegratingctandphotoncountingctdata
AT marcelldijkshoorn assessmentofiodinecontrasttonoiseratioinvirtualmonoenergeticimagesreconstructedfromdualsourceenergyintegratingctandphotoncountingctdata
AT aadvanderlugt assessmentofiodinecontrasttonoiseratioinvirtualmonoenergeticimagesreconstructedfromdualsourceenergyintegratingctandphotoncountingctdata
AT marcelvanstraten assessmentofiodinecontrasttonoiseratioinvirtualmonoenergeticimagesreconstructedfromdualsourceenergyintegratingctandphotoncountingctdata