The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct Imaging

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has provided the first opportunity of studying the atmospheres of terrestrial exoplanets and estimating their surface conditions. Earth-sized planets around Sun-like stars are currently inaccessible with JWST, however, and will have to be observed using the next...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Colby M. Ostberg, Scott D. Guzewich, Stephen R. Kane, Erika Kohler, Luke D. Oman, Thomas J. Fauchez, Ravi K. Kopparapu, Jacob Richardson, Patrick Whelley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Astronomical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acfe12
_version_ 1797655780294393856
author Colby M. Ostberg
Scott D. Guzewich
Stephen R. Kane
Erika Kohler
Luke D. Oman
Thomas J. Fauchez
Ravi K. Kopparapu
Jacob Richardson
Patrick Whelley
author_facet Colby M. Ostberg
Scott D. Guzewich
Stephen R. Kane
Erika Kohler
Luke D. Oman
Thomas J. Fauchez
Ravi K. Kopparapu
Jacob Richardson
Patrick Whelley
author_sort Colby M. Ostberg
collection DOAJ
description The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has provided the first opportunity of studying the atmospheres of terrestrial exoplanets and estimating their surface conditions. Earth-sized planets around Sun-like stars are currently inaccessible with JWST, however, and will have to be observed using the next generation of telescopes with direct-imaging capabilities. Detecting active volcanism on an Earth-like planet would be particularly valuable as it would provide insight into its interior and provide context for the commonality of the interior states of Earth and Venus. In this work, we used a climate model to simulate four exoEarths over eight years with ongoing large igneous province eruptions with outputs ranging from 1.8 to 60 Gt of sulfur dioxide. The atmospheric data from the simulations were used to model direct-imaging observations between 0.2 and 2.0 μ m, producing reflectance spectra for every month of each exoEarth simulation. We calculated the amount of observation time required to detect each of the major absorption features in the spectra, and we identified the most prominent effects that volcanism had on the reflectance spectra. These effects include changes in the size of the O _3 , O _2 , and H _2 O absorption features and changes in the slope of the spectrum. Of these changes, we conclude that the most detectable and least ambiguous evidence of volcanism are changes in both O _3 absorption and the slope of the spectrum.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T17:20:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61cce638f58a42e2bfe663b90b2a348f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-3881
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T17:20:05Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astronomical Journal
spelling doaj.art-61cce638f58a42e2bfe663b90b2a348f2023-10-19T14:12:01ZengIOP PublishingThe Astronomical Journal1538-38812023-01-01166519910.3847/1538-3881/acfe12The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct ImagingColby M. Ostberg0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7968-0309Scott D. Guzewich1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1149-7385Stephen R. Kane2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-0529Erika Kohler3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0000-199XLuke D. Oman4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-2598Thomas J. Fauchez5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5967-9631Ravi K. Kopparapu6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5893-2471Jacob Richardson7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1736-8907Patrick Whelley8https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3266-9772Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California , Riverside, CA 92521, USA ; costb001@ucr.edu; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California , Riverside, CA 92521, USA ; costb001@ucr.eduNASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; Integrated Space Science and Technology Institute, Department of Physics, American University , Washington, DC, USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; Sellers Exoplanet Environments Collaboration, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center , 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA; University of Maryland , Department of Astronomy, College Park, MD 20742, USAThe James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has provided the first opportunity of studying the atmospheres of terrestrial exoplanets and estimating their surface conditions. Earth-sized planets around Sun-like stars are currently inaccessible with JWST, however, and will have to be observed using the next generation of telescopes with direct-imaging capabilities. Detecting active volcanism on an Earth-like planet would be particularly valuable as it would provide insight into its interior and provide context for the commonality of the interior states of Earth and Venus. In this work, we used a climate model to simulate four exoEarths over eight years with ongoing large igneous province eruptions with outputs ranging from 1.8 to 60 Gt of sulfur dioxide. The atmospheric data from the simulations were used to model direct-imaging observations between 0.2 and 2.0 μ m, producing reflectance spectra for every month of each exoEarth simulation. We calculated the amount of observation time required to detect each of the major absorption features in the spectra, and we identified the most prominent effects that volcanism had on the reflectance spectra. These effects include changes in the size of the O _3 , O _2 , and H _2 O absorption features and changes in the slope of the spectrum. Of these changes, we conclude that the most detectable and least ambiguous evidence of volcanism are changes in both O _3 absorption and the slope of the spectrum.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acfe12Exoplanet atmospheresExoplanet astronomyExoplanet detection methodsExoplanetsVolcanismDirect imaging
spellingShingle Colby M. Ostberg
Scott D. Guzewich
Stephen R. Kane
Erika Kohler
Luke D. Oman
Thomas J. Fauchez
Ravi K. Kopparapu
Jacob Richardson
Patrick Whelley
The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct Imaging
The Astronomical Journal
Exoplanet atmospheres
Exoplanet astronomy
Exoplanet detection methods
Exoplanets
Volcanism
Direct imaging
title The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct Imaging
title_full The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct Imaging
title_fullStr The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct Imaging
title_full_unstemmed The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct Imaging
title_short The Prospect of Detecting Volcanic Signatures on an ExoEarth Using Direct Imaging
title_sort prospect of detecting volcanic signatures on an exoearth using direct imaging
topic Exoplanet atmospheres
Exoplanet astronomy
Exoplanet detection methods
Exoplanets
Volcanism
Direct imaging
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acfe12
work_keys_str_mv AT colbymostberg theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT scottdguzewich theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT stephenrkane theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT erikakohler theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT lukedoman theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT thomasjfauchez theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT ravikkopparapu theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT jacobrichardson theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT patrickwhelley theprospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT colbymostberg prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT scottdguzewich prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT stephenrkane prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT erikakohler prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT lukedoman prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT thomasjfauchez prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT ravikkopparapu prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT jacobrichardson prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging
AT patrickwhelley prospectofdetectingvolcanicsignaturesonanexoearthusingdirectimaging