General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography

Abstract Background In the context of rising dementia prevalence, the workload of general practitioners (GPs) in dementia care is set to increase. However, there are many aspects of dementia care that GPs find challenging. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) affect the majority...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aisling A. Jennings, Tony Foley, Kieran A. Walsh, Alice Coffey, John P. Browne, Colin P. Bradley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0732-7
_version_ 1819146575206678528
author Aisling A. Jennings
Tony Foley
Kieran A. Walsh
Alice Coffey
John P. Browne
Colin P. Bradley
author_facet Aisling A. Jennings
Tony Foley
Kieran A. Walsh
Alice Coffey
John P. Browne
Colin P. Bradley
author_sort Aisling A. Jennings
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In the context of rising dementia prevalence, the workload of general practitioners (GPs) in dementia care is set to increase. However, there are many aspects of dementia care that GPs find challenging. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) affect the majority of people with dementia and is an aspect of dementia care that GPs find particularly difficult to manage. The aim of this mixed methods systematic review is to undertake a synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies on GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing BPSD. Methods Seven electronic bibliographic databases will be searched from inception to present. All qualitative or quantitative studies that explore the knowledge, attitude or experiences of GPs towards the management of BPSD in community and/or residential settings will be eligible for inclusion. A meta-ethnography will be conducted to synthesise included studies. Primary outcome measures will include GPs’ experiences of managing BPSD, GPs’ knowledge of BPSD and their attitude to different approaches to the management of BPSD, in particular their attitude to non-pharmacological approaches. All included papers will be independently assessed for methodological validity by two reviewers using the following tools: the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research, the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool for intervention studies and the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational and analytical cross-sectional studies. As there is no agreed quality assessment tool for descriptive cross-sectional studies, an original tool will be developed. Two independent reviewers will apply the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) tool to the review findings. The results will be reported in line with the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. Discussion This study will be the first systematic review that synthesises the existing literature of GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing BPSD in community and residential care. This review will improve our understanding of GPs’ perspectives on the management of BPSD, and the results will be used to inform the development of an intervention to improve the management of BPSD in general practice. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42017054916.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T13:16:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61cd15b3751b4845abd4207f0da1d7bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T13:16:06Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-61cd15b3751b4845abd4207f0da1d7bf2022-12-21T18:24:36ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532018-04-01711910.1186/s13643-018-0732-7General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnographyAisling A. Jennings0Tony Foley1Kieran A. Walsh2Alice Coffey3John P. Browne4Colin P. Bradley5Department of General Practice, University College CorkDepartment of General Practice, University College CorkSchool of Public Health, University College CorkDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of LimerickSchool of Public Health, University College CorkDepartment of General Practice, University College CorkAbstract Background In the context of rising dementia prevalence, the workload of general practitioners (GPs) in dementia care is set to increase. However, there are many aspects of dementia care that GPs find challenging. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) affect the majority of people with dementia and is an aspect of dementia care that GPs find particularly difficult to manage. The aim of this mixed methods systematic review is to undertake a synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies on GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing BPSD. Methods Seven electronic bibliographic databases will be searched from inception to present. All qualitative or quantitative studies that explore the knowledge, attitude or experiences of GPs towards the management of BPSD in community and/or residential settings will be eligible for inclusion. A meta-ethnography will be conducted to synthesise included studies. Primary outcome measures will include GPs’ experiences of managing BPSD, GPs’ knowledge of BPSD and their attitude to different approaches to the management of BPSD, in particular their attitude to non-pharmacological approaches. All included papers will be independently assessed for methodological validity by two reviewers using the following tools: the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research, the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool for intervention studies and the National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational and analytical cross-sectional studies. As there is no agreed quality assessment tool for descriptive cross-sectional studies, an original tool will be developed. Two independent reviewers will apply the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) tool to the review findings. The results will be reported in line with the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) statement. Discussion This study will be the first systematic review that synthesises the existing literature of GPs’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing BPSD in community and residential care. This review will improve our understanding of GPs’ perspectives on the management of BPSD, and the results will be used to inform the development of an intervention to improve the management of BPSD in general practice. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42017054916.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0732-7DementiaGeneral practitionersBehavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS)Knowledge and attitudesQualitative research
spellingShingle Aisling A. Jennings
Tony Foley
Kieran A. Walsh
Alice Coffey
John P. Browne
Colin P. Bradley
General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography
Systematic Reviews
Dementia
General practitioners
Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS)
Knowledge and attitudes
Qualitative research
title General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_full General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_fullStr General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_full_unstemmed General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_short General practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta-ethnography
title_sort general practitioners knowledge attitudes and experiences of managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia protocol of a mixed methods systematic review and meta ethnography
topic Dementia
General practitioners
Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD)
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS)
Knowledge and attitudes
Qualitative research
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0732-7
work_keys_str_mv AT aislingajennings generalpractitionersknowledgeattitudesandexperiencesofmanagingbehaviouralandpsychologicalsymptomsofdementiaprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT tonyfoley generalpractitionersknowledgeattitudesandexperiencesofmanagingbehaviouralandpsychologicalsymptomsofdementiaprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT kieranawalsh generalpractitionersknowledgeattitudesandexperiencesofmanagingbehaviouralandpsychologicalsymptomsofdementiaprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT alicecoffey generalpractitionersknowledgeattitudesandexperiencesofmanagingbehaviouralandpsychologicalsymptomsofdementiaprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT johnpbrowne generalpractitionersknowledgeattitudesandexperiencesofmanagingbehaviouralandpsychologicalsymptomsofdementiaprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewandmetaethnography
AT colinpbradley generalpractitionersknowledgeattitudesandexperiencesofmanagingbehaviouralandpsychologicalsymptomsofdementiaprotocolofamixedmethodssystematicreviewandmetaethnography