Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?

ABSTRACT Purpose Targeted biopsy (TB) combined with systematic biopsy (SB) is an optimized mode of prostate biopsy but can often lead to oversampling and overdiagnosis accompanied by potential biopsy-related complications and patient discomfort. Here, we attempted to reasonably stratify the patien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhengtong Lv, Jinfu Wang, Miao Wang, Huimin Hou, Liuqi Song, Haodong Li, Xuan Wang, Ming Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2023-06-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382023000300359&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1797810357016723456
author Zhengtong Lv
Jinfu Wang
Miao Wang
Huimin Hou
Liuqi Song
Haodong Li
Xuan Wang
Ming Liu
author_facet Zhengtong Lv
Jinfu Wang
Miao Wang
Huimin Hou
Liuqi Song
Haodong Li
Xuan Wang
Ming Liu
author_sort Zhengtong Lv
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Purpose Targeted biopsy (TB) combined with systematic biopsy (SB) is an optimized mode of prostate biopsy but can often lead to oversampling and overdiagnosis accompanied by potential biopsy-related complications and patient discomfort. Here, we attempted to reasonably stratify the patient population based on multi-parameter indicators with the aim of avoiding unnecessary SB. Methods In total, 340 biopsy-naïve men with suspected lesions, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/mL and prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) ≥ 3 enrolled for study underwent both TB and SB. The primary outcome was to determine independent predictors for a valid diagnosis, assuming that only TB was performed and SB omitted (defined as mono-TB), taking TB + SB as the reference standard. The secondary outcomes were exploration of the predictive factors of mono-TB and TB + SB in detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Results The mean PSA density (PSAD) of patient group was 0.27 ng/mL/mL. Multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores were 3-5 in 146 (42.94%), 105 (30.88%), and 89 (26.18%) cases, respectively. PCa and csPCa were detected in 178/340 (52.35%) and 162/340 (47.65%) patients, respectively. Overall, 116/178 (65.17%) patients diagnosed with PCa displayed pathological consistencies between mono-TB and TB + SB modes. PSAD and PI-RADS were independent predictors of valid diagnosis using mono-TB. Conclusions PSAD combined with PI-RADS showed utility in guiding optimization of the prostate biopsy mode. Higher PSAD and PI-RADS values were associated with greater confidence in implementing mono-TB and safely omitting SB, thus effectively balancing the benefits and risks.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T07:07:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61d17323aae9414a9edeb4467adeeede
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-6119
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T07:07:33Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format Article
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-61d17323aae9414a9edeb4467adeeede2023-06-06T07:36:03ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192023-06-0149335937110.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0060Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?Zhengtong LvJinfu WangMiao WangHuimin HouLiuqi SongHaodong LiXuan Wanghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-3239Ming LiuABSTRACT Purpose Targeted biopsy (TB) combined with systematic biopsy (SB) is an optimized mode of prostate biopsy but can often lead to oversampling and overdiagnosis accompanied by potential biopsy-related complications and patient discomfort. Here, we attempted to reasonably stratify the patient population based on multi-parameter indicators with the aim of avoiding unnecessary SB. Methods In total, 340 biopsy-naïve men with suspected lesions, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 20 ng/mL and prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) ≥ 3 enrolled for study underwent both TB and SB. The primary outcome was to determine independent predictors for a valid diagnosis, assuming that only TB was performed and SB omitted (defined as mono-TB), taking TB + SB as the reference standard. The secondary outcomes were exploration of the predictive factors of mono-TB and TB + SB in detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Results The mean PSA density (PSAD) of patient group was 0.27 ng/mL/mL. Multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores were 3-5 in 146 (42.94%), 105 (30.88%), and 89 (26.18%) cases, respectively. PCa and csPCa were detected in 178/340 (52.35%) and 162/340 (47.65%) patients, respectively. Overall, 116/178 (65.17%) patients diagnosed with PCa displayed pathological consistencies between mono-TB and TB + SB modes. PSAD and PI-RADS were independent predictors of valid diagnosis using mono-TB. Conclusions PSAD combined with PI-RADS showed utility in guiding optimization of the prostate biopsy mode. Higher PSAD and PI-RADS values were associated with greater confidence in implementing mono-TB and safely omitting SB, thus effectively balancing the benefits and risks.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382023000300359&lng=en&tlng=enProstatic NeoplasmsProstateMagnetic Resonance Imaging
spellingShingle Zhengtong Lv
Jinfu Wang
Miao Wang
Huimin Hou
Liuqi Song
Haodong Li
Xuan Wang
Ming Liu
Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
title_full Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
title_fullStr Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
title_full_unstemmed Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
title_short Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
title_sort is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of mri trus fusion targeted biopsy
topic Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382023000300359&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengtonglv isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy
AT jinfuwang isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy
AT miaowang isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy
AT huiminhou isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy
AT liuqisong isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy
AT haodongli isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy
AT xuanwang isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy
AT mingliu isitnecessaryforallpatientswithsuspiciouslesionsundergosystematicbiopsyintheeraofmritrusfusiontargetedbiopsy