Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers
<p>The interplay of bio-aerosol dispersion and impact, meteorology, and air quality is gaining increasing interest in the wide spectrum of atmospheric sciences. Experiments conducted inside confined artificial environments, such as atmospheric simulation chambers (ASCs), where atmospheric cond...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| Online Access: | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/4461/2021/amt-14-4461-2021.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818601068838256640 |
|---|---|
| author | S. G. Danelli S. G. Danelli M. Brunoldi M. Brunoldi D. Massabò D. Massabò F. Parodi V. Vernocchi V. Vernocchi P. Prati P. Prati |
| author_facet | S. G. Danelli S. G. Danelli M. Brunoldi M. Brunoldi D. Massabò D. Massabò F. Parodi V. Vernocchi V. Vernocchi P. Prati P. Prati |
| author_sort | S. G. Danelli |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>The interplay of bio-aerosol dispersion and impact,
meteorology, and air quality is gaining increasing interest in the wide spectrum
of atmospheric sciences. Experiments conducted inside confined artificial
environments, such as atmospheric simulation chambers (ASCs), where
atmospheric conditions and composition are controlled, can provide valuable
information on bio-aerosol viability, dispersion, and impact. We focus here
on the reproducible aerosolization and injection of viable microorganisms
into an ASC, the first and crucial step of any experimental protocol to
expose bio-aerosols to different atmospheric conditions. We compare the
performance of three nebulizers specifically designed for bio-aerosol
applications: the Collison nebulizer, the Blaustein Atomizing Modules (BLAM), and the Sparging Liquid Aerosol Generator (SLAG), all manufactured and commercialized by CH TECHNOLOGIES. The comparison refers to operating
conditions and the concentration of viable bacteria at the nebulizer outlet,
with the final goal being to measure the reproducibility of the nebulization
procedures and assess their application in experiments inside ASCs. A typical
bacterial test model, <i>Escherichia coli</i> (ATCC<sup>®</sup> 25922™), was
selected for such characterization. Bacteria suspensions with a
concentration around 10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>8</sup></span> CFU mL<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> were first aerosolized at
different air pressures and collected by a liquid impinger to obtain a
correlation curve between airflow and nebulized bacteria for each
generator. Afterwards, bacteria were aerosolized inside the atmospheric
simulation chamber ChAMBRe (Chamber for Aerosol Modelling and Bio-aerosol
Research) to measure the reproducibility of the whole procedure. An overall
reproducibility of 11 % (i.e., standard deviation of the results obtained with the three nebulizers) was obtained with each nebulizer through a set of
baseline experiments.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T12:45:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-61d57790c9e2446c889c0bc9e263e49c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1867-1381 1867-8548 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T12:45:31Z |
| publishDate | 2021-06-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| spelling | doaj.art-61d57790c9e2446c889c0bc9e263e49c2022-12-21T22:31:18ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482021-06-01144461447010.5194/amt-14-4461-2021Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambersS. G. Danelli0S. G. Danelli1M. Brunoldi2M. Brunoldi3D. Massabò4D. Massabò5F. Parodi6V. Vernocchi7V. Vernocchi8P. Prati9P. Prati10Dipartimento di Fisica – Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN – Sezione di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica – Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN – Sezione di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica – Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN – Sezione di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN – Sezione di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica – Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN – Sezione di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica – Università di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN – Sezione di Genova, via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, Italy<p>The interplay of bio-aerosol dispersion and impact, meteorology, and air quality is gaining increasing interest in the wide spectrum of atmospheric sciences. Experiments conducted inside confined artificial environments, such as atmospheric simulation chambers (ASCs), where atmospheric conditions and composition are controlled, can provide valuable information on bio-aerosol viability, dispersion, and impact. We focus here on the reproducible aerosolization and injection of viable microorganisms into an ASC, the first and crucial step of any experimental protocol to expose bio-aerosols to different atmospheric conditions. We compare the performance of three nebulizers specifically designed for bio-aerosol applications: the Collison nebulizer, the Blaustein Atomizing Modules (BLAM), and the Sparging Liquid Aerosol Generator (SLAG), all manufactured and commercialized by CH TECHNOLOGIES. The comparison refers to operating conditions and the concentration of viable bacteria at the nebulizer outlet, with the final goal being to measure the reproducibility of the nebulization procedures and assess their application in experiments inside ASCs. A typical bacterial test model, <i>Escherichia coli</i> (ATCC<sup>®</sup> 25922™), was selected for such characterization. Bacteria suspensions with a concentration around 10<span class="inline-formula"><sup>8</sup></span> CFU mL<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> were first aerosolized at different air pressures and collected by a liquid impinger to obtain a correlation curve between airflow and nebulized bacteria for each generator. Afterwards, bacteria were aerosolized inside the atmospheric simulation chamber ChAMBRe (Chamber for Aerosol Modelling and Bio-aerosol Research) to measure the reproducibility of the whole procedure. An overall reproducibility of 11 % (i.e., standard deviation of the results obtained with the three nebulizers) was obtained with each nebulizer through a set of baseline experiments.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/4461/2021/amt-14-4461-2021.pdf |
| spellingShingle | S. G. Danelli S. G. Danelli M. Brunoldi M. Brunoldi D. Massabò D. Massabò F. Parodi V. Vernocchi V. Vernocchi P. Prati P. Prati Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
| title | Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers |
| title_full | Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers |
| title_fullStr | Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers |
| title_short | Comparative characterization of the performance of bio-aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers |
| title_sort | comparative characterization of the performance of bio aerosol nebulizers in connection with atmospheric simulation chambers |
| url | https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/4461/2021/amt-14-4461-2021.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sgdanelli comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT sgdanelli comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT mbrunoldi comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT mbrunoldi comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT dmassabo comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT dmassabo comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT fparodi comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT vvernocchi comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT vvernocchi comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT pprati comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers AT pprati comparativecharacterizationoftheperformanceofbioaerosolnebulizersinconnectionwithatmosphericsimulationchambers |