Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three Decades

Dyadic coping (DC), how couples cope together to deal with a stressor like chronic illness, has received increased attention over the last three decades. The aim of the current study was to summarize the current state of research on DC in couples. We conducted a scoping review of qualitative, quanti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharina Weitkamp, Guy Bodenmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876455/full
_version_ 1818552683778277376
author Katharina Weitkamp
Guy Bodenmann
author_facet Katharina Weitkamp
Guy Bodenmann
author_sort Katharina Weitkamp
collection DOAJ
description Dyadic coping (DC), how couples cope together to deal with a stressor like chronic illness, has received increased attention over the last three decades. The aim of the current study was to summarize the current state of research on DC in couples. We conducted a scoping review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies published between 1990 and 2020, assessing DC in couples during three decades. 5,705 studies were identified in three electronic databases and hand searches. We included 643 sources in this review (with a total of N = 112,923 study participants). Most studies were based in the global North, particularly in the US and Europe. Publication numbers increased constantly over time. A third of study designs were cross-sectional studies followed by qualitative and longitudinal studies. The most prolific DC research areas were related to DC and minor stressors and DC and major physical health stressors. Overall, DC has been established internationally as a highly relevant construct in many disciplines (clinical, social, developmental, personality psychology, social work, nursing etc.). To conclude, the review reveals that future studies should focus on predictors, trajectories, and the importance of very specific DC behaviors for personal and dyadic functioning.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:16:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61df7b7a0cb2462fb32b7ef13d553ee1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:16:23Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-61df7b7a0cb2462fb32b7ef13d553ee12022-12-22T00:29:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782022-06-011310.3389/fpsyg.2022.876455876455Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three DecadesKatharina WeitkampGuy BodenmannDyadic coping (DC), how couples cope together to deal with a stressor like chronic illness, has received increased attention over the last three decades. The aim of the current study was to summarize the current state of research on DC in couples. We conducted a scoping review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies published between 1990 and 2020, assessing DC in couples during three decades. 5,705 studies were identified in three electronic databases and hand searches. We included 643 sources in this review (with a total of N = 112,923 study participants). Most studies were based in the global North, particularly in the US and Europe. Publication numbers increased constantly over time. A third of study designs were cross-sectional studies followed by qualitative and longitudinal studies. The most prolific DC research areas were related to DC and minor stressors and DC and major physical health stressors. Overall, DC has been established internationally as a highly relevant construct in many disciplines (clinical, social, developmental, personality psychology, social work, nursing etc.). To conclude, the review reveals that future studies should focus on predictors, trajectories, and the importance of very specific DC behaviors for personal and dyadic functioning.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876455/fulldyadic copingcouple copingclose relationshipsscoping reviewstress
spellingShingle Katharina Weitkamp
Guy Bodenmann
Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three Decades
Frontiers in Psychology
dyadic coping
couple coping
close relationships
scoping review
stress
title Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three Decades
title_full Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three Decades
title_fullStr Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three Decades
title_full_unstemmed Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three Decades
title_short Couples Coping Together: A Scoping Review of the Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence and Conceptual Work Across Three Decades
title_sort couples coping together a scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence and conceptual work across three decades
topic dyadic coping
couple coping
close relationships
scoping review
stress
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876455/full
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinaweitkamp couplescopingtogetherascopingreviewofthequantitativeandqualitativeevidenceandconceptualworkacrossthreedecades
AT guybodenmann couplescopingtogetherascopingreviewofthequantitativeandqualitativeevidenceandconceptualworkacrossthreedecades