A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical Comparison

In recent years, an increase in periprosthetic femur fractures has become apparent due to the increased number of hip replacements. In the case of Vancouver type B1 fractures, locking plate systems offer safe procedures. This study compared the distal lateral femur plate (LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Rau, Gabriele Rußow, Mark Heyland, Dag Wulsten, Clemens Kösters, Werner Schmölz, Sven Märdian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/892
_version_ 1797486764326125568
author Daniel Rau
Gabriele Rußow
Mark Heyland
Dag Wulsten
Clemens Kösters
Werner Schmölz
Sven Märdian
author_facet Daniel Rau
Gabriele Rußow
Mark Heyland
Dag Wulsten
Clemens Kösters
Werner Schmölz
Sven Märdian
author_sort Daniel Rau
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, an increase in periprosthetic femur fractures has become apparent due to the increased number of hip replacements. In the case of Vancouver type B1 fractures, locking plate systems offer safe procedures. This study compared the distal lateral femur plate (LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup>, aap Implantate AG) with a standard L.I.S.S. LCP<sup>®</sup> (DePuy Synthes) regarding their biomechanical properties in fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures after hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the new LOQTEQ system has superior stability and durability in comparison. Eighteen artificial left femurs were randomized in two groups (Group A: LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup>; Group B: L.I.S.S. LCP<sup>®</sup>) and tested until failure. Failure was defined as 10° varus deformity and catastrophic implant failure (loosening, breakage, progressive bending). Axial stiffness, loads of failure, cycles of failure, modes of failure were recorded. The axial stiffness in Group A with 73.4 N/mm (SD +/− 3.0) was significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.001) than in Group B (40.7 N/mm (SD +/− 2.8)). Group A resists more cycles than Group B until 10° varus deformity. Catastrophic failure mode was plate breakage in Group A and bending in Group B. In conclusion, LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup> provides higher primary stability and tends to have higher durability.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:38:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-61e8ed2b4651471f8ab1c1a131504538
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:38:55Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-61e8ed2b4651471f8ab1c1a1315045382023-11-23T16:55:38ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-02-0111389210.3390/jcm11030892A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical ComparisonDaniel Rau0Gabriele Rußow1Mark Heyland2Dag Wulsten3Clemens Kösters4Werner Schmölz5Sven Märdian6Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyBIH-Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyBIH-Julius Wolff Institute for Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Hand Surgery, Maria-Josef-Hospital Greven, 48268 Greven, GermanyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 13353 Berlin, GermanyIn recent years, an increase in periprosthetic femur fractures has become apparent due to the increased number of hip replacements. In the case of Vancouver type B1 fractures, locking plate systems offer safe procedures. This study compared the distal lateral femur plate (LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup>, aap Implantate AG) with a standard L.I.S.S. LCP<sup>®</sup> (DePuy Synthes) regarding their biomechanical properties in fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures after hip arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the new LOQTEQ system has superior stability and durability in comparison. Eighteen artificial left femurs were randomized in two groups (Group A: LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup>; Group B: L.I.S.S. LCP<sup>®</sup>) and tested until failure. Failure was defined as 10° varus deformity and catastrophic implant failure (loosening, breakage, progressive bending). Axial stiffness, loads of failure, cycles of failure, modes of failure were recorded. The axial stiffness in Group A with 73.4 N/mm (SD +/− 3.0) was significantly higher (<i>p</i> = 0.001) than in Group B (40.7 N/mm (SD +/− 2.8)). Group A resists more cycles than Group B until 10° varus deformity. Catastrophic failure mode was plate breakage in Group A and bending in Group B. In conclusion, LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup> provides higher primary stability and tends to have higher durability.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/892periprosthetic femur fracturebiomechanical studyVancouver B1 fractureLOQTEQ<sup>®</sup>locking attachment platebiomechanical study
spellingShingle Daniel Rau
Gabriele Rußow
Mark Heyland
Dag Wulsten
Clemens Kösters
Werner Schmölz
Sven Märdian
A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical Comparison
Journal of Clinical Medicine
periprosthetic femur fracture
biomechanical study
Vancouver B1 fracture
LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup>
locking attachment plate
biomechanical study
title A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical Comparison
title_full A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical Comparison
title_fullStr A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical Comparison
title_full_unstemmed A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical Comparison
title_short A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization—A Biomechanical Comparison
title_sort new system for periprosthetic fracture stabilization a biomechanical comparison
topic periprosthetic femur fracture
biomechanical study
Vancouver B1 fracture
LOQTEQ<sup>®</sup>
locking attachment plate
biomechanical study
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/3/892
work_keys_str_mv AT danielrau anewsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT gabrielerußow anewsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT markheyland anewsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT dagwulsten anewsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT clemenskosters anewsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT wernerschmolz anewsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT svenmardian anewsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT danielrau newsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT gabrielerußow newsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT markheyland newsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT dagwulsten newsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT clemenskosters newsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT wernerschmolz newsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison
AT svenmardian newsystemforperiprostheticfracturestabilizationabiomechanicalcomparison