PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract Background Ovarian cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death among women, characterized by late diagnosis and a high relapse rate. In randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in treating advanced ovarian cancer. M...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ovarian Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01362-y |
_version_ | 1797273595846590464 |
---|---|
author | István Baradács Brigitta Teutsch Alex Váradi Alexandra Bilá Ádám Vincze Péter Hegyi Tamás Fazekas Balázs Komoróczy Péter Nyirády Nándor Ács Ferenc Bánhidy Balázs Lintner |
author_facet | István Baradács Brigitta Teutsch Alex Váradi Alexandra Bilá Ádám Vincze Péter Hegyi Tamás Fazekas Balázs Komoróczy Péter Nyirády Nándor Ács Ferenc Bánhidy Balázs Lintner |
author_sort | István Baradács |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Ovarian cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death among women, characterized by late diagnosis and a high relapse rate. In randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in treating advanced ovarian cancer. Methods This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283150), included all phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PARPi on ovarian cancer until the 13th of April, 2022. The main outcomes were progression- free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The random-effects model was applied in all analyses. Results In the meta-analysis, 16 eligible RCTs were included, with a total of 5,815 patients. In recurrent ovarian cancer, PARPi maintenance therapy showed a significant PFS benefit over placebo in the total population (HR 0.34, CI 0.29–0.40), BRCA mutant (HR 0.24, CI 0.18–0.31), germline BRCA mutant (HR 0.23, CI 0.18–0.30), and BRCA wild-type cases (HR 0.50, CI 0.39–0.65). PARPi monotherapy also improved PFS (HR 0.62, CI 0.51–0.76) compared with chemotherapy in BRCAm patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. The use of PARPi maintenance therapy resulted in an improvement in PFS over placebo in newly-diagnosed cancers in the overall population (HR 0.46, CI 0.30–0.71) and the BRCAm population (HR 0.36, CI 0.29–0.44). Although the risk of severe AEs was increased by PARPi therapy compared to placebo in most settings investigated, these side effects were controllable with dose modification, and treatment discontinuation was required in the minority of cases. Conclusions PARPis are an effective therapeutic option for newly-diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer. Despite a minor increase in the frequency of serious adverse effects, they are generally well tolerated. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:46:39Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-61e923472eb845c2937e2fb723ecf0d2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1757-2215 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:46:39Z |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Ovarian Research |
spelling | doaj.art-61e923472eb845c2937e2fb723ecf0d22024-03-05T19:58:09ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152024-02-0117111410.1186/s13048-024-01362-yPARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsIstván Baradács0Brigitta Teutsch1Alex Váradi2Alexandra Bilá3Ádám Vincze4Péter Hegyi5Tamás Fazekas6Balázs Komoróczy7Péter Nyirády8Nándor Ács9Ferenc Bánhidy10Balázs Lintner11Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis UniversityCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis UniversityInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of PécsCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis UniversityCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis UniversityCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis UniversityCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis UniversityCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Semmelweis UniversityAbstract Background Ovarian cancer is the eighth leading cause of cancer-related death among women, characterized by late diagnosis and a high relapse rate. In randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in treating advanced ovarian cancer. Methods This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021283150), included all phase II and phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of PARPi on ovarian cancer until the 13th of April, 2022. The main outcomes were progression- free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Pooled hazard ratios (HRs), and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The random-effects model was applied in all analyses. Results In the meta-analysis, 16 eligible RCTs were included, with a total of 5,815 patients. In recurrent ovarian cancer, PARPi maintenance therapy showed a significant PFS benefit over placebo in the total population (HR 0.34, CI 0.29–0.40), BRCA mutant (HR 0.24, CI 0.18–0.31), germline BRCA mutant (HR 0.23, CI 0.18–0.30), and BRCA wild-type cases (HR 0.50, CI 0.39–0.65). PARPi monotherapy also improved PFS (HR 0.62, CI 0.51–0.76) compared with chemotherapy in BRCAm patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. The use of PARPi maintenance therapy resulted in an improvement in PFS over placebo in newly-diagnosed cancers in the overall population (HR 0.46, CI 0.30–0.71) and the BRCAm population (HR 0.36, CI 0.29–0.44). Although the risk of severe AEs was increased by PARPi therapy compared to placebo in most settings investigated, these side effects were controllable with dose modification, and treatment discontinuation was required in the minority of cases. Conclusions PARPis are an effective therapeutic option for newly-diagnosed and recurrent ovarian cancer. Despite a minor increase in the frequency of serious adverse effects, they are generally well tolerated.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01362-yOlaparibNiraparibRucaparibHRDHomologous recombination repair |
spellingShingle | István Baradács Brigitta Teutsch Alex Váradi Alexandra Bilá Ádám Vincze Péter Hegyi Tamás Fazekas Balázs Komoróczy Péter Nyirády Nándor Ács Ferenc Bánhidy Balázs Lintner PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Journal of Ovarian Research Olaparib Niraparib Rucaparib HRD Homologous recombination repair |
title | PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | PARP inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | parp inhibitor era in ovarian cancer treatment a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Olaparib Niraparib Rucaparib HRD Homologous recombination repair |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01362-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT istvanbaradacs parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT brigittateutsch parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT alexvaradi parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT alexandrabila parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT adamvincze parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT peterhegyi parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT tamasfazekas parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT balazskomoroczy parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT peternyirady parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT nandoracs parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT ferencbanhidy parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT balazslintner parpinhibitorerainovariancancertreatmentasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |