Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model
Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the influence of two novel reciprocating movements on the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic reciprocating files. Methods 30 Procodile® (Komet Medical, Lemgo, Germany) files were selected in this study and distributed according to the fol...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Oral Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01538-8 |
_version_ | 1818456609042464768 |
---|---|
author | Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho Alberto Albaladejo Martínez Carlos Falcão Costa Norberto Quispe-López Ruben Agustín-Panadero Jesús Mena-Álvarez |
author_facet | Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho Alberto Albaladejo Martínez Carlos Falcão Costa Norberto Quispe-López Ruben Agustín-Panadero Jesús Mena-Álvarez |
author_sort | Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the influence of two novel reciprocating movements on the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic reciprocating files. Methods 30 Procodile® (Komet Medical, Lemgo, Germany) files were selected in this study and distributed according to the following study groups depending on the movements to be performed: ReFlex Dynamic (n = 10), ReFlex Smart (n = 10) and Reciproc (n = 10) reciprocating movement. These files were fixed to a specific dynamic cyclic fatigue device designed and manufactured by 3D impression to simulate the pecking motion performed by the operator. The time to failure and the number of cycles of in-and-out of the endodontic files was registered. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Weibull statistics. Results Statistically significant differences were found when the number of cycles of in-and-out movement and the time to failure of ReFlex Dynamic and Reciproc reciprocating movement (p < 0.001) and between ReFlex Smart and Reciproc reciprocating movement (p < 0.001) were compared in pairs. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between time to failure and number of cycles of in-and-out movement of ReFlex Dynamic and ReFlex Smart reciprocating movement (p = 0.253). Conclusions The ReFlex Smart reciprocating movement increased the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic reciprocating files compared with traditional reciprocating movement. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T22:29:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-61f5cd6d003f447ab00c899f29b2c20a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1472-6831 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T22:29:23Z |
publishDate | 2021-04-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Oral Health |
spelling | doaj.art-61f5cd6d003f447ab00c899f29b2c20a2022-12-21T22:45:17ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312021-04-0121111010.1186/s12903-021-01538-8Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic modelÁlvaro Zubizarreta-Macho0Alberto Albaladejo Martínez1Carlos Falcão Costa2Norberto Quispe-López3Ruben Agustín-Panadero4Jesús Mena-Álvarez5Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X el Sabio UniversityDepartment of Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of SalamancaFaculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa UniversityDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X el Sabio UniversityDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of ValenciaDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X el Sabio UniversityAbstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the influence of two novel reciprocating movements on the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic reciprocating files. Methods 30 Procodile® (Komet Medical, Lemgo, Germany) files were selected in this study and distributed according to the following study groups depending on the movements to be performed: ReFlex Dynamic (n = 10), ReFlex Smart (n = 10) and Reciproc (n = 10) reciprocating movement. These files were fixed to a specific dynamic cyclic fatigue device designed and manufactured by 3D impression to simulate the pecking motion performed by the operator. The time to failure and the number of cycles of in-and-out of the endodontic files was registered. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and Weibull statistics. Results Statistically significant differences were found when the number of cycles of in-and-out movement and the time to failure of ReFlex Dynamic and Reciproc reciprocating movement (p < 0.001) and between ReFlex Smart and Reciproc reciprocating movement (p < 0.001) were compared in pairs. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between time to failure and number of cycles of in-and-out movement of ReFlex Dynamic and ReFlex Smart reciprocating movement (p = 0.253). Conclusions The ReFlex Smart reciprocating movement increased the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic reciprocating files compared with traditional reciprocating movement.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01538-8EndodonticsCyclic fatigueNitinolReciprocating movement |
spellingShingle | Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho Alberto Albaladejo Martínez Carlos Falcão Costa Norberto Quispe-López Ruben Agustín-Panadero Jesús Mena-Álvarez Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model BMC Oral Health Endodontics Cyclic fatigue Nitinol Reciprocating movement |
title | Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model |
title_full | Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model |
title_fullStr | Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model |
title_short | Influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model |
title_sort | influence of the type of reciprocating motion on the cyclic fatigue resistance of reciprocating files in a dynamic model |
topic | Endodontics Cyclic fatigue Nitinol Reciprocating movement |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01538-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvarozubizarretamacho influenceofthetypeofreciprocatingmotiononthecyclicfatigueresistanceofreciprocatingfilesinadynamicmodel AT albertoalbaladejomartinez influenceofthetypeofreciprocatingmotiononthecyclicfatigueresistanceofreciprocatingfilesinadynamicmodel AT carlosfalcaocosta influenceofthetypeofreciprocatingmotiononthecyclicfatigueresistanceofreciprocatingfilesinadynamicmodel AT norbertoquispelopez influenceofthetypeofreciprocatingmotiononthecyclicfatigueresistanceofreciprocatingfilesinadynamicmodel AT rubenagustinpanadero influenceofthetypeofreciprocatingmotiononthecyclicfatigueresistanceofreciprocatingfilesinadynamicmodel AT jesusmenaalvarez influenceofthetypeofreciprocatingmotiononthecyclicfatigueresistanceofreciprocatingfilesinadynamicmodel |