Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study

Abstract Gallbladder (GB) disease is a common pathology that needs correct and early diagnosis for the optimum medical treatment. Early diagnosis is crucial as any delay or misdiagnosis can worsen the patient situation. Incorrect diagnosis could also lead to an escalation in patient symptoms and poo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Mahdi Obaid, Amina Turki, Hatem Bellaaj, Mohamed Ksantini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-03-01
Series:International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00431-w
_version_ 1797259009349124096
author Ahmed Mahdi Obaid
Amina Turki
Hatem Bellaaj
Mohamed Ksantini
author_facet Ahmed Mahdi Obaid
Amina Turki
Hatem Bellaaj
Mohamed Ksantini
author_sort Ahmed Mahdi Obaid
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Gallbladder (GB) disease is a common pathology that needs correct and early diagnosis for the optimum medical treatment. Early diagnosis is crucial as any delay or misdiagnosis can worsen the patient situation. Incorrect diagnosis could also lead to an escalation in patient symptoms and poorer clinical outcomes. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, ranging from Machine Learning (ML) to Deep Learning (DL) to predict disease progression, identify abnormalities, and estimate mortality rates associated with GB disorders has increased over the past decade. To this end, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of the AI approaches used in the diagnosis of GB illnesses. This review compiles and compares relevant papers from the last decade to show how AI might enhance diagnostic precision, speed, and efficiency. Therefore, this survey gives researchers the opportunity to find out both the diagnosis of GB diseases and AI techniques in one place. The maximum accuracy rate by ML was when using SVM with 96.67%, whilst the maximum accuracy rate by DL was by utilising a unique structure of VGG, GoogleNet, ResNet, AlexNet and Inception with 98.77%. This could provide a clear path for further investigations and algorithm’s development to boost diagnostic results to improve the patient’s condition and choose the appropriate treatment.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T23:02:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6204beed77044aadb906d2bce9e19bac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1875-6883
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:02:37Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
spelling doaj.art-6204beed77044aadb906d2bce9e19bac2024-03-17T12:37:48ZengSpringerInternational Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems1875-68832024-03-0117111910.1007/s44196-024-00431-wDiagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative StudyAhmed Mahdi Obaid0Amina Turki1Hatem Bellaaj2Mohamed Ksantini3National School of Electronic and Telecommunications, University of SfaxControl and Energies Management Laboratory (CEM-Lab), National Engineering School of Sfax, University of SfaxReDCAD, National Engineering School of Sfax, University of SfaxControl and Energies Management Laboratory (CEM-Lab), National Engineering School of Sfax, University of SfaxAbstract Gallbladder (GB) disease is a common pathology that needs correct and early diagnosis for the optimum medical treatment. Early diagnosis is crucial as any delay or misdiagnosis can worsen the patient situation. Incorrect diagnosis could also lead to an escalation in patient symptoms and poorer clinical outcomes. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, ranging from Machine Learning (ML) to Deep Learning (DL) to predict disease progression, identify abnormalities, and estimate mortality rates associated with GB disorders has increased over the past decade. To this end, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of the AI approaches used in the diagnosis of GB illnesses. This review compiles and compares relevant papers from the last decade to show how AI might enhance diagnostic precision, speed, and efficiency. Therefore, this survey gives researchers the opportunity to find out both the diagnosis of GB diseases and AI techniques in one place. The maximum accuracy rate by ML was when using SVM with 96.67%, whilst the maximum accuracy rate by DL was by utilising a unique structure of VGG, GoogleNet, ResNet, AlexNet and Inception with 98.77%. This could provide a clear path for further investigations and algorithm’s development to boost diagnostic results to improve the patient’s condition and choose the appropriate treatment.https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00431-wGallbladderDiagnosisArtificial intelligenceMachine learningDeep learning
spellingShingle Ahmed Mahdi Obaid
Amina Turki
Hatem Bellaaj
Mohamed Ksantini
Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
Gallbladder
Diagnosis
Artificial intelligence
Machine learning
Deep learning
title Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study
title_full Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study
title_short Diagnosis of Gallbladder Disease Using Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study
title_sort diagnosis of gallbladder disease using artificial intelligence a comparative study
topic Gallbladder
Diagnosis
Artificial intelligence
Machine learning
Deep learning
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-024-00431-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmahdiobaid diagnosisofgallbladderdiseaseusingartificialintelligenceacomparativestudy
AT aminaturki diagnosisofgallbladderdiseaseusingartificialintelligenceacomparativestudy
AT hatembellaaj diagnosisofgallbladderdiseaseusingartificialintelligenceacomparativestudy
AT mohamedksantini diagnosisofgallbladderdiseaseusingartificialintelligenceacomparativestudy